Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(112 days)
The Catalyst system is intended for use in radiation therapy clinics to accurately set-up and position patients in a reproducible way prior to treatment, and to monitor the patient continuously during treatment. The system provides, information about a patient's position and the adjustments required in order to position the patient as close as possible to a reference setup. During monitoring, the system reports deviations in the patient's position during treatment and disables the treatment beam in case of large detected movements. The system can also track the patient's respiratory motion for supporting synchronized image acquisition or treatment delivery.
The Catalyst system is a further development of the Sentinel system and is using the same software platform but contains a new hardware device which enables overall higher performance and the possibility to run multiple applications in parallel.
Catalyst is an advanced system based on optical surface tracking for patient monitoring during the radiotherapy treatment process. The Catalyst platform is based on advanced structured light measurements with multipurpose software modules covering different tasks in the treatment procedure. The c4D multi-application software supports all modes of operation in one integrated package. The software is user friendly and requires a minimum of user interaction in the daily clinical workflow, while providing the advanced user with sophisticated data management, analysis and reporting functionalities. The software is designed to integrate with existing systems at the clinic, such as CT, linacs and R&V systems, and with motorized couch tops.
Catalyst includes three application modules, cPosition for fast and accuracy patient positioning, cMotion for motion detection during the treatment delivery procedure, and cRespiration for detecting respiratory motion and generating a gating signal for synchronized imaging or gated treatment delivery.
The Catalyst hardware consists of a single scanner unit containing the projector and camera, mounted in the celling in front of the gantry. The scanner is connected to the PC running the c4D software.
During patient surface acquisition, a sequence of structured light patterns is illuminating the patient while the camera records a number of images. From the data acquired, a complete 3D surface of the patient can be reconstructed using the principles of optical triangulation. Information from the system is shown on a PC monitor in the treatment room as well as the control area. The system can also project a high resolution multi-color light field onto the patient surface, thus avoiding the need for the personnel to look at the PC monitor when setting up the patient. The system optionally records data which can be used for further analysis of actual patient motion during each treatment session.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study information for the C-RAD Catalyst device, based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|
Measurement accuracy | Better than 1 mm |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The document does not explicitly state the numerical sample size used for the test set. It mentions "The validation performed at Varian Medical Systems, UAS and Malmö shows that the Catalyst application for patient positioning, monitoring and respiratory gating is functioning according to its intended use." This suggests prospective in-clinic testing at multiple sites (Varian Medical Systems, UAS, Malmö), implying that the data provenance is from clinical environments in those locations. The document does not specify the country beyond naming these sites.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications
The document does not specify the number of experts used or their qualifications for establishing ground truth for the test set. It states the system "shall only be used by hospital personnel, qualified to work in radiation therapy or diagnostic imaging departments," which implies that the validation would involve such qualified personnel, but doesn't detail their role in ground truth establishment.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
The document does not describe the specific adjudication method used for the test set.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
No multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study is mentioned that assesses human readers' improvement with or without AI assistance. The device is a positioning and monitoring system, not and AI-assisted diagnostic tool for human readers.
6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance Study
Yes, a standalone performance study was conducted. The "Performance data" section explicitly states, "The measurement accuracy is better than 1 mm for Catalyst and its predicates. The performance test results are presented in the application." This refers to the algorithm's direct measurement capability independently of human interpretation.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
The type of ground truth used is implied to be a combination of:
- Physical measurement/reference: For "measurement accuracy better than 1 mm," the ground truth would likely be established through highly accurate physical measurement systems or phantoms.
- Clinical observation/intended function: For "functioning according to its intended use" for patient positioning, monitoring, and respiratory gating, the ground truth would be based on the established clinical procedures and expected behavior in a real-world scenario.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
The document does not provide information about a specific "training set" or its size. As a surface tracking and positioning system, it might rely on pre-programmed algorithms and physical principles rather than a large, labeled training dataset in the way a modern AI image classification model would. If machine learning was used, the training data details are not disclosed.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Since no specific training set is mentioned (see point 8), the method for establishing its ground truth is not described.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1