Search Filters

Search Results

Found 2 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K062250, K071379, K021478, K071948

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Aequalis Shoulder Range (except Aequalis for Fracture):
    Prosthetic replacement with this device may be indicated to relieve severe pain or significant disability caused by:

    • Degenerative pathologies: arthrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, post-traumatic arthrosis. . Primary and secondary necrosis of the humeral head
    • Displaced 4-part upper humeral fracture i
    • Humeral head fracture
    • Humeral head fracture
      Other pathologies where arthrodesis or resectional arthroplasty of the humeral head are i not acceptable ·
    • Revision surgery when other treatments or devices have failed. i

    Aequalis monobloc stem is for use with cemented applications and is labeled as such. Aequalis Inditionio stem is for uncemented applications and is labeled as such.
    Aequalis Press-Fit stem is for uncemented applications and is labels as such. Aequalis Fress-Fit sich is for uncemented applications ad is labeled as such.

    Aequalis for Fracture:
    Traumatic or pathologic conditions of the shoulder resulting in fracture of the glenohumeral frequres Traumatic or pathologic concilibilis of the since as and displaced 3-or 4-part proximal humeral fractures.
    joint, including humeral head fracture and displaced 3-or 4-part pr Revision surgery when other treatments or devices have failed.

    Aequalis fracture stem is for cemented use.

    Aequalis Reversed Shoulder Prosthesis:
    Acqualis Reversed Shoulder Prosthesis is indicated for patients with a functional deltoid The Aequalis Reversed Shoulder Frosthesis is the relief of panin and significant disability
    muscle as a total shoulder replacement for the relief off paint and significant Th following arthropathy associated to massive and non repairshe rotator cuff-tear. This device is also indicated for the prosthetic revisions with massive and non repairable rolator colfis also indicated for the prosilent revisions whiles. The glenoid implant is anchored to the bone with 4 screws and is for non-cemented fixation.

    the bone with 4 screws and is for non-cention interest to be insufficient to bear When during the primary surgery the gions one accure occurs during the surgical procedures, the hemi-prosthesis adaptor and the union screw be adapted to the humeral
    procedures, the hemi-prosthesis adaptor and the union screw cases in the humeral procedures, the nemi-prosthesis adaptor and the amon before and on reversed hemi-prosthesis.

    hemi-prosthesis.
    When, in case of revision of a Aequalis Reversed prosthesis, the glenoid bone stock appears When, in case of revision of a Aequalis Reverse of Aequalis Reversed range again, the to be insufficient to implant a baseptate and the union screw allows for the transformation of the use of the hemi-prosthesis adaptor and the amon serow and is to the morder to avoid the revision of the humeral components.

    Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis:
    The Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis is indicated for patients with a functional deltoid muscle as a total shoulder replacement for the relief of pain or significant disability following arthropathy associated to a grossly deficient rotator cuff joint:

    • in case of traumatic or pathologic conditions of the shoulder resulting in fracture of the ، glenohumeral joint, including humeral head fracture and displaced 3-or 4-part proximal humeral fractures, or
    • in case of bone defect in proximal humerus. ।

    The Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis is also indicated for prosthetic revisions with a grossly deficient rotator cuff joint when other treatments or devices have failed.

    When during the primary surgery the glenoid bone stock appears to be insufficient to bear the reversed glenoid components or when glenoid bone fracture occurs during the surgical procedures, the hemiprosthesis adaptor and the union screw can be adapted to the humeral components in order to transform the Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis into a non reversed hemi-prosthesis.

    When, in case of revision of a Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis, the glenoid bone stock appears to be insufficient to implant a base plate and a sphere of Aequalis Reversed range again, the use of the hemi-prosthesis adaptor and the union screw allows for the transformation of the Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis into a non reversed hemi-prosthesis in order to avoid the revision of the humeral components.

    The Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder humeral stem is used in association with the glenoid components of the Aequalis Reversed Shoulder Prosthesis.

    The Aegualis Reversed Fracture Shoulder humeral stem is for cemented use only.

    Device Description

    For the Aequalis Fracture Shoulder System:
    The usual goal of total shoulder replacement and hemi-arthroplasty of the shoulder is to restore the shoulder joint to its best working condition and to reduce or eliminate pain. The Aequalis Shoulder Fracture System is intended to accomplish these goals. With the Aequalis Shoulder Fracture System, the natural glenoid elements of the shoulder may be conserved or replaced as warranted by the state of disease or injury. Thus the Aequalis Shoulder Fracture System is intended for use as a total shoulder replacement system, or as a hemi-shoulder. The modular nature of the system allows for the later conversion of a primary hemi-arthroplasty to a total shoulder replacement.

    For the Aequalis Reversed Shoulder Prosthesis:
    The Aequalis Reversed Shoulder Prosthesis is intended to relieve pain and significant disability following massive and non repairable cuff-tear associated to arthropathy and following massive cuff-tear arthropathy. In this case, the rotator muscles of the shoulder (supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor and long head of the biceps) are no more useful for mobility, and only the deltoid (for abduction and external rotation) and the subscapularis (for internal rotation) are functional.

    Therefore, the usual goal of such surgery is to restore the shoulder joint to facilitate its working condition and to reduce or eliminate pain. The Aequalis Reversed Shoulder Prosthesis is intended to accomplish these goals. Its reversed design allows to medialize the center of the shoulder, lengthening the deltoid muscle lever arm.

    The Aequalis Reversed Shoulder Prosthesis is a semi-constrained system composed of a humeral and a glenoid parts.

    For the Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis:
    The Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis is intended to relieve pain or significant disability following massive cuff-tear associated to arthropathy and following massive cuff-tear arthropathy. In this case, the rotator muscles of the shoulder (supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor and long head of the biceps) are no more useful for mobility, and only the deltoid (for abduction and external rotation) and the subscapularis (for internal rotation) are functional.

    Therefore, the usual goal of surgery is to restore the shoulder joint to facilitate its working condition and to reduce or eliminate pain. The Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis is intended to accomplish these goals. Its reversed design allows to medialize the center of rotation of the shoulder, lengthening the deltoid muscle lever arm and its Aequalis Fracture Shoulder humeral stem-like design allows to facilitate the bone reconstruction and improve the tuberosity healing and fixation.

    The Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis is a semi-constrained system composed of a humeral and a glenoid parts.

    The present submission corresponds to the following modification:

    • Addition of a new coating subcontractor (hydroxyapatite coating): APS Materials, Inc. on . titanium components (stem and baseplate).
      All the prostheses of this file are strictly identical to the previously cleared devices except for the coating supplier. The indications for use of each device are not modified.
    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but the provided text from the FDA 510(k) Premarket Notification for the Aequalis Shoulder Fracture System and related prostheses does not include information about acceptance criteria or a study proving that an AI/Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) meets such criteria.

    The document is a clearance letter and a summary of safety and effectiveness for a physical medical device (shoulder prostheses). It discusses:

    • Device Names: Aequalis Shoulder Fracture System, Aequalis Reversed Shoulder Prosthesis, Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis.
    • Regulatory Information: Regulation number, regulation name, product codes, regulatory class (Class II).
    • Indications for Use: Detailed descriptions of the medical conditions for which each type of shoulder prosthesis is intended.
    • Device Description: Information on the components, their function, and the surgical goals.
    • Materials: Specifically mentions titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) and hydroxyapatite coating, and a new coating subcontractor (APS Materials, Inc.).
    • Predicate Devices: Lists previously cleared devices to which the current devices are compared for substantial equivalence.

    There is no mention of:

    • AI/Machine Learning: No algorithm, software, or AI component is described.
    • Acceptance Criteria for AI Performance: No metrics like sensitivity, specificity, AUC, or other performance thresholds are stipulated.
    • Clinical Study for AI Validation: No details of a study with a test set, ground truth establishment, expert adjudication, or MRMC studies are present.
    • Training Data: No information on training sets for an AI model.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request to describe the acceptance criteria and the study that proves an AI/SaMD device meets them based on the provided text. The document pertains to the clearance of traditional orthopedic implants.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K082120
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2008-10-24

    (88 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3660
    Why did this record match?
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis is indicated for patients with a functional deltoid muscle as a total shoulder replacement for the relief of pain or significant disability following arthropathy associated to a grossly deficient rotator cuff joint :

    • in case of traumatic or pathologic conditions of the shoulder resulting in fracture of the glenohumeral joint, including humeral head fracture and displaced 3-or 4-part proximal humeral fractures, or
    • in case of bone defect in proximal humerus. .

    The Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis is also indicated for prosthetic revisions with a grossly deficient rotator cuff joint when other treatments or devices have failed.

    When during the primary surgery the glenoid bone stock appears to be insufficient to bear the reversed glenoid components or when glenoid bone fracture occurs during the surgical procedures, the hemiprosthesis adaptor and the union screw can be adapted to the humeral components in order to transform the Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis into a non reversed hemi-prosthesis.

    When, in case of revision of a Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder humeral stem, the glenoid bone stock appears to be insufficient to implant a base plate and a sphere of Aequalis Reversed range again, the use of the hemi-prosthesis adaptor and the union screw allows for the transformation of the Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis into a non reversed hemi-prosthesis in order to avoid the revision of the humeral components.

    The Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder humeral stem is used in association with the glenoid components of the Aequalis Reversed Shoulder Prosthesis.

    The Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder humeral stem is for cemented use only.

    Device Description

    The Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis is intended to relieve pain or significant disability following massive cuff-tear associated to arthropathy and following massive cuff-tear arthropathy. In this case, the rotator muscles of the shoulder (supraspinatus, teres minor and long head of the biceps) are no more useful for mobility, and only the deltoid (for abduction and external rotation) and the subscapularis (for internal rotation) are functional.

    Therefore, the usual goal of surgery is to restore the shoulder joint to facilitate its working condition and to reduce or eliminate pain. The Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis is intended to accomplish these goals. Its reversed design allows to medialize the center of rotation of the shoulder, lengthening the deltoid muscle lever arm and its Aequalis Fracture Shoulder humeral stem-like design allows to facilitate the bone reconstruction and improve the tuberosity healing and fixation.

    The Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis is a semi-constrained system composed of a humeral and a glenoid parts.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) premarket notification for the "Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis." It outlines the device's indications for use, materials, and provides a comparative analysis to predicate devices to establish substantial equivalence.

    Based on the provided text, here's a breakdown of the requested information:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    This document describes a medical device (Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis) and its substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than an AI/software device. Therefore, the concept of "acceptance criteria" as typically applied to performance metrics like sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy for an AI system is not directly applicable here.

    Instead, the "acceptance criteria" implicitly referred to are the regulatory requirements for showing substantial equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices, as defined by the FDA's 510(k) process. This involves demonstrating that the new device is as safe and effective as the predicate device(s). The document indicates that the device meets these criteria as the FDA issued a "substantially equivalent letter."

    The "reported device performance" is not quantified in terms of clinical outcomes or performance metrics in this document, but rather in terms of its design, materials, and intended use being comparable to existing devices already deemed safe and effective.

    Acceptance Criteria (Implied for 510(k) Clearance)Reported Device Performance (as per document)
    Substantial Equivalence to Legally Marketed Predicate DevicesThe FDA has determined the device is substantially equivalent for the stated indications for use to legally marketed predicate devices. This implies that the Tornier Aequalis Reversed Fracture Shoulder Prosthesis is considered as safe and effective as the predicate devices. This assessment is based on comparisons in design, materials, and intended use.

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

    This document is a regulatory submission for a medical implant (a shoulder prosthesis), not a study evaluating an AI device's performance. Therefore, there is no test set, sample size, or data provenance information related to an AI algorithm's evaluation. The evaluation is based on a comparison to predicate devices, materials testing, and design specifications.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

    Not applicable, as this is a medical device submission, not an AI study requiring expert ground truth for a test set.

    4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

    Not applicable, as this is a medical device submission.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    Not applicable, as this is a medical device submission, not an AI or software device that would involve human readers or AI assistance.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    Not applicable, as this is a medical device submission, not an AI or software device.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

    For this medical device, the "ground truth" for regulatory clearance is the established safety and effectiveness of the legally marketed predicate devices. The new device demonstrates substantial equivalence by showing similar technological characteristics, materials, and intended use, supported by engineering testing and clinical experience with similar devices, rather than a specific "ground truth" derived from patient data in the context of an AI algorithm validation.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    Not applicable, as this is a physical medical device submission, not an AI/machine learning model that requires a training set.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    Not applicable, as this is a physical medical device submission.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1