Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K083499
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2009-05-08

    (164 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    884.5980
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K053414, K071512

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Coloplast Exair Anterior and Posterior prolapse repair systems are indicated for tissue reinforcement and long-lasting stabilization of fascial structures of the pelvic floor in vaginal wall prolapse where surgical treatment is intended, either as mechanical support or bridging material for the fascial defect.

    Device Description

    The Exair Anterior Prolapse Repair System is made of NovaSilk mesh precut into a shape with an enlarged body and four appendages extending out from the main body. The Exair Posterior Prolapse Repair System is made of NovaSilk mesh precut into a shape with an elongated body and two appendages extending out from the main body. The mesh arms for both Exair Anterior and Exair Posterior Prolapse Repair Systems are sleeved in 2-mil thick polyethylene to facilitate device arm implantation and positioning; sleeves are removed after proper placement of implant is achieved. The System instrumentation includes a hollow introducer used to create a passage through the tissues and facilitate placement of the mesh arms, and four (4) anterior or two (2) posterior retrievers used to guide the mesh arms into place through the (1) and for positioning and fixating the mesh body. The System is provided sterile and for single use only.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is for a 510(k) summary for a medical device called Exair Anterior and Posterior Prolapse Repair Systems. This type of submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than proving that the device meets specific acceptance criteria through a clinical study.

    Therefore, the document does not contain the information requested in the prompt regarding acceptance criteria, a study proving device meets acceptance criteria, sample sizes, expert involvement, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, or ground truth details.

    The summary states that "Substantial equivalence is supported by bench testing comparing Exair to the predicate devices and biocompatibility testing performed on the Exair device and instrumentation." This indicates non-clinical testing was performed, but no details about specific performance metrics or acceptance criteria for that testing are provided in this document.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1