Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(30 days)
The device is intended for delivery of laser light to soft tissue in the contact and non contact mode during surgical procedures including via endoscopes. The 150W Ceralas D980 is generally indicated for use in incision, excision, vaporization, ablation, hemostasis or coagulation of soft tissue in ear, nose and throat and oral surgery (otolaryngology), arthroscopy, gastroenterology, general surgery, dermatology, plastic surgery, podiatry, urology, gynecology, neurosurgery (peripheral nervous system), pulmonary surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, dental applications, and endovenous occlusion of the greater saphenous vein.
The device is specifically indicated for use as follows:
Ear, Nose and Throat and Oral Surgery (Otolaryngology)
Hemostasis, incision, excision, ablation, coagulation, and vaporization of tissue from the ear, nose, throat and adjacent areas including soft tissue in the oral cavity. Examples include:
- Removal of benign lesions from the ear, nose and throat
- Excision and vaporization of vocal cord nodules and polyps
- Incision and excision of carcinoma in situ
- Ablation and vaporization of hyperkeratosis
- Excision of carcinoma of the larynx
- Laryngeal papillomectomy
- Excision and vaporization of herpes simplex I and II
- Neck dissection
Arthroscopy
Hemostasis, incision, excision, coagulation, vaporization and ablation of joint tissues during arthroscopic surgery. Examples include:
- Menisectomy
- Synovectomy
- Chondromalacia
Gastroenterology
Hemostasis, incision, excision, ablation, coagulation and vaporization of tissue in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tracts and also with endoscopic procedures. Examples include:
- Hemostasis of upper and lower GI bleeding
- Excision and vaporization of colorectal carcinoma
- Excision of polyps
General Surgery, Dermatology, Plastic Surgery and Podiatry
Excision, ablation, vaporization and photocoagulation of skin lesions, hemostasis, incision, excision, vaporization, ablation and debulking of soft tissue, abdominal, rectal, skin, fat or muscle tissue and dermabrasion. Examples include:
- Matrixectomy
- Excision of neuromas
- Excision of periungual and subungual warts
- Excision of plantar warts
- Excision of keloids
- Liver resection
- Excision of cutaneous lesions
- Hemorrhoidectomy
- Appendectomy
- Debridement of decubitus ulcers
- Hepatobiliary tumors
- Mastectomy
- Dermabrasion
- Vaporization and hemostasis of capillary hemangioma
- Excision, vaporization and hemostasis of abdominal tumors
- Excision, vaporization and hemostasis of rectal pathology
- Pilonidal cystectomy
- Herniorapphy
- Adhesiolysis
- Parathyroidectomy
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- Thyroidectomy
- Resection of organs
- Debridement of wounds
- Photocoagulation of teleangectasia of the legs and face
- Photocoagulation of vascular lesions of the face and extremities
- Endovascular coagulation of the greater saphenous vein of the thigh in patients with superficial vein reflux.
- Treatment of reticular veins and branch varicosities
Urology
Excision, vaporization, incision, coagulation, ablation and hemostasis of urological tissues. Examples include:
- Vaporization of urethral tumors
- Release of urethral stricture
- Removal of bladder neck obstruction
- Excision and vaporization of condyloma
- Lesions of external genitalia
- Vaporization of the prostate to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
Gynecology
Ablation, excision, incision, coagulation, hemostasis and vaporization of gynecological tissue. Examples include:
- Endometrial ablation
- Excision or vaporization of condylomata acuminata
- Vaporization of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
- Cervical conization
- Menorrhagia
Neurosurgery
Vaporization, coagulation, excision, incision, ablation and hemostasis of soft tissue. Examples include: hemostasis in conjunction with menigiomas
Cardiac Surgery
Hemostasis and coagulation of soft tissue, including cardiac tissue.
Pulmonary Surgery
Hemostasis, vaporization, coagulation, incision, excision and ablation of soft tissue in the pulmonary system. Examples include:
- Tracheobronchial malignancy or stricture
- Benign and malignant pulmonary obstruction
- Endoscopic pulmonary applications
Dental Applications
Indicated for the following applications on intraoral and extraoral soft tissue (including marginal and interdental gingival and epithelial lining of free gingival): frenectomy, frenotomy, biopsy, operculectomy, implant recovery, gingivectomy, gingivoplasty, gingival troughing, crown lengthening, hemostasis of donor site, removal of granulation tissue, laser assisted flap surgery, debridement of diseased epithelial lining, incisions and draining of abscesses, tissue retraction for impressions, papillectomy, vestibuloplasy, excision of lesions, exposure of unerupted/partially erupted teeth, leukoplakia, removal of hyperplastic tissues, treatment of aphthous ulcers and sulcular debridement (removal of diseased or inflamed soft tissue in the periodontal pocket), pulpotomy, pulpotomy as an adjunct to root canal therapy and light activation of bleaching materials for teeth whitening.
Endovenous Occlusion of the Greater Saphenous Vein in Patients with Superficial Vein Reflux
Indicated for use with the ELVes Procedure Kit in the endovascular coagulation of the Greater Saphenous Vein (GSV) of the thigh in patients with Superficial Vein Reflux.
The 150W Ceralas D980 has the same technological characteristics as the cleared 100W Ceralas D980 and substantially similar technological characteristics as compared to the INTERmedic Diode Laser and the Xintec Vectra Diode Laser.
The provided text is a 510(k) summary for a medical device (Biolitec Inc.'s 150W Ceralas Diode 980nm Laser System). It discusses the device's intended use, indications for use, technological characteristics, and substantial equivalence to predicate devices. However, it does not contain information about acceptance criteria or specific studies proving the device meets acceptance criteria.
The document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to already cleared devices, which is the regulatory pathway used for this laser system. This typically involves showing that the new device has the same intended use, similar technological characteristics, and raises no new safety or effectiveness concerns compared to predicate devices. It does not typically involve reporting on a study with specific acceptance criteria in the way you've outlined for performance analysis.
Therefore, I cannot populate the requested table or answer most of your questions as the information is not present in the provided text.
Here's what I can extract based on your questions, acknowledging the significant gaps due to the nature of the provided document:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|
Not specified in document | Not specified in document |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
Not specified in the document. The document states "Performance data demonstrate that the Ceralas D150 is as safe and effective as the predicate devices," but no details on specific studies, sample sizes, or data provenance are provided.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
Not applicable/specified. This type of information is typically found in studies evaluating diagnostic or AI-driven devices, which is not the case here. This document pertains to a surgical laser system.
4. Adjudication method for the test set
Not applicable/specified.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This document describes a surgical laser system, not an AI-driven or diagnostic imaging device that would typically involve a multi-reader multi-case study.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This is a surgical laser system, so the concept of an "algorithm only" performance study is not relevant.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
Not applicable/specified. The document does not describe studies that would rely on "ground truth" as typically defined for diagnostic or AI algorithm evaluation. The "performance data" mentioned generally refers to demonstrating the device's physical operational parameters and
(presumably) safety profile in comparison to existing devices.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable/specified. There is no mention of a "training set" as this is not an AI/machine learning device.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable/specified. There is no mention of a "training set" or "ground truth" in this context.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1