Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(153 days)
The LuxIR is intended for photocoagulation of soft tissue in dermatologic applications. It also provides topical heating for the purpose of elevating tissue temperature for the temporary relief of minor muscle and joint pain and stiffness, the temporary relief of minor joint pain associated with arthritis, the temporary increase in local circulation where applied, and the relaxation of muscles. In addition, it may also help muscle spasms, minor sprains and strains, and minor muscular back pain.
The LuxIR Handpiece is an accessory to the StarLux™ Pulsed Laser and Light System. The complete StarLux Pulsed Light System consists of a cart, system console, chiller, a footswitch, and a handpiece. The Palomar LuxIR Handpiece emits energy in the infrared wavelength.
The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the Palomar LuxIR Handpiece. It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than providing a detailed study report with specific acceptance criteria and performance metrics for a novel device.
Therefore, the requested information, particularly regarding specific acceptance criteria, a detailed study proving device performance, sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, and ground truth establishment for a training set, is not present in the provided document.
The document states:
- "The review of the performance data provided in this notification demonstrates that the modified LuxIR Handpiece is substantially equivalent to its predicate device." This indicates that the performance review likely focused on comparing the new device's characteristics to the predicate, not on setting new performance criteria and testing against them from scratch.
- "The modified LuxIR Handpiece was found to be substantially equivalent to its predicate device because it shares identical indications for use, substantially similar technical characteristics, and operation." This further emphasizes the comparative nature of the assessment.
Without a detailed clinical study report or a different type of performance evaluation document, it's impossible to fill out the table and answer the specific questions you've posed. The 510(k) summary aims to argue for equivalence, not to present a de novo performance study with specific metrics and acceptance criteria for a new device type.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1