Search Filters

Search Results

Found 2 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K100586
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2010-11-29

    (272 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4400
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K083461, K051214, K031671

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Venus Freeze is a non-invasive device intended for use in Dermatologic and general surgical procedures for the non-invasive treatment of mild to moderate facial wrinkles and rhytides.

    Device Description

    The Venus Freeze is a noninvasive, non-ablative device consisting of:

    • Main Unit (console)
    • Touch Screen user interface
    • RF Power module
    • Controller unit
    • Two treatment applicators:
      (1) Octipolar M applicator - for large treatment areas, composed of 8 RF electrodes
      (2) Diamondpolar™ applicator - for small treatment areas, composed of 4 RF electrodes.
      The Touch Screen user interface allows the selection of treatment parameters (time and power) by pressing on the treatment buttons and displays the current treatments settings.
      The Controller Unit provides the operational and safety function of the system.
      Treatment applicators transmit Bi-Polar RF energy in a method that creates an organized Bi-Polar RF energy matrix which produces homogeneous heating in the entire treatment area for maximum safety and efficacy, eliminating the need for pre/post cooling mechanisms.
      The RF power module provides RF energy to the selected applicator, producing a 1MHz signal.
    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text states that for the Venus Freeze device, "Venus-Concept believes that animal and clinical studies are not required to determine the safety and efficacy of the device" due to previously published scientific research and clinical studies on similar radiofrequency devices. Therefore, a specific study proving the device meets acceptance criteria as typically outlined in an FDA submission with performance data, sample sizes, and ground truth establishment was not conducted for this 510(k) submission.

    Instead, the acceptance criteria are implicitly met by demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices and adherence to relevant performance standards for safety.

    Here's a breakdown of the requested information based on the provided text, highlighting what is available and what is explicitly stated as not required or not applicable:


    Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance

    Acceptance Criteria (Implied)Reported Device Performance
    Adherence to recognized safety standards for medical electrical equipment (e.g., ANSI AAMI 60601-2-2 for safety of high-frequency surgical equipment, EN 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2).The Venus Freeze complies with ANSI AAMI 60601-2-2, EN 60601-1, and IEC 60601-1-2.
    Substantial equivalence to predicate devices for the non-invasive treatment of mild to moderate facial wrinkles and rhytides.The Venus Freeze is found substantially equivalent to the EndyMed Imagine TC Skin Treatment System (K083461), Lumenis Aluma (K051214), and Syneron Polaris (K031671) based on its intended use, power, and frequency being within previously cleared values.
    Safety and efficacy of radiofrequency devices emitting energy with a frequency of 1000 KHz and power of 37 to 150 W (as established in scientific research and clinical studies on similar systems).The device operates within these parameters (1MHz signal, power not explicitly stated but implied to be within the 37-150W range of established devices). The submitter states that safety and efficacy are "well established in scientific research and clinical studies" for devices with these characteristics. The submitter cites "comprehensive animal and clinical study performed in scientific research and published in the literature" for similar devices.

    Study Details (As per the provided document, studies were not conducted for this specific device's 510(k) submission to establish safety and efficacy directly.)

    1. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective):

      • Not applicable. No new test set data from a clinical or animal study was generated for this 510(k) submission. The safety and efficacy relied on existing literature for similar devices.
    2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience):

      • Not applicable. No new ground truth was established for a test set specific to the Venus Freeze device in this submission.
    3. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:

      • Not applicable. No new test set requiring adjudication was used.
    4. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

      • Not applicable. This device is a non-AI electrosurgical device for dermatologic procedures; therefore, an MRMC study related to readers and AI assistance is not relevant.
    5. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

      • Not applicable. This is a hardware device, not an AI algorithm. Its performance is inherent in its operation and not separate from human-in-the-loop (operator) performance.
    6. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc):

      • For the purpose of this 510(k) submission, the "ground truth" for safety and efficacy for the device type (radiofrequency devices for wrinkle treatment) was established through "comprehensive animal and clinical study performed in scientific research and published in the literature" of similar devices, rather than new evidence for the Venus Freeze itself.
    7. The sample size for the training set:

      • Not applicable. No training set for an algorithm was used or mentioned. The device's design implicitly relies on established engineering principles and prior research of similar devices.
    8. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

      • Not applicable. No training set was used.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K060448
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2006-07-06

    (135 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4810
    Why did this record match?
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Lumenis One Family of Systems (and the delivery accessories that are used with them to deliver light and/or laser and/or RF energy) is indicated for use in surgical, aesthetic and cosmetic applications in the medical specialties of general and plastic surgery, and dermatology as follows:

    Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) Wavelengths (515 - 1200 nm):
    The 515-1200 nm intense pulsed light wavelengths are indicated for:

    • The treatment of benign pigmented epidermal lesions, including dyschromia, hyperpigmentation, melasma, ephelides (freckles);
    • The treatment of tattoos;
    • The treatment of cutaneous lesions, including warts, scars and striae;
    • The treatment of benign cutaneous vascular lesions, including port wine stains, hemangiomas, facial, truncal and leg telangiectasias, rosacea, erythema of rosacea, angiomas and spider angiomas, poikiloderma of Civatte, leg veins and venous malformations;
    • The removal of unwanted hair from all skin types, and to effect stable long-term, or permanent, hair reduction in skin types I-V through selective targeting of melanin in hair follicles.

    Nd:YAG Laser Wavelength (1064 nm):
    The 1064 nm wavelength produced by the Nd: YAG laser is indicated for:

    • The coagulation and hemostasis of vascular lesions and soft tissue, including:
    • Treatment and clearance of superficial and deep telangiectasias (venulectasias) and reticular veins (0.1 - 4.0 mm diameter) of the leg:
    • The removal of unwanted hair from all skin types, and to effect stable long-term, or permanent, hair reduction in skin types I-V through selective targeting of melanin in hair follicies;
    • The non-ablative treatment of facial wrinkles.

    LightSheer Diode Laser Wavelength (800 mm):
    The 800 nm wavelength produced by the LightSheer diode laser is indicated for:

    • The removal of unwanted hair, and to effect stable long-term, or permanent', hair reduction through selective targeting of melani, in hair follicles;
    • The treatment of vascular lesions, including angiomas, hemangiomas telangiectasia and other benign vascular lesions;
    • The treatment of leg veins;
    • The treatment of benign pigmented lesion;
    • The treatment of pseudofolliculitis barbae;

    The LightSheer diode laser is intended for use on all skin types (Fitzpatrick skin types 1 - VI), including tanned skin.

    Aluma RF Energy (468 kHz):
    The Aluma 468 kHz energy is indicated for:

    • The Aluma Skin Renewal System is intended for use in Dermatologic and General Surgical procedures for the non-invasive treatment of wrinkles and thytids.
    Device Description

    Lumenis One systems are comprised of the following main components:

    • System console;
    • Control and Display;
    • One or more delivery handpieces, the Treatment Heads (up to three attached out of four handpieces available for each system);
    • Skin cooling technology integrated into the handpiece (as applicable);
    • Trigger button integrated into the handpiece; an additional safety button integrated into the laser handpieces;
    • Remote interlock connector (disables pulse emission when treatment room door is opened).
    AI/ML Overview

    This 510(k) summary explicitly states that no clinical data was provided for the Lumenis One Family of Systems. The device's substantial equivalence to predicate devices was based on shared indications for use and similar or identical technical specifications, not on new performance studies.

    Therefore, the following information cannot be found or accurately described from the provided text:

    • A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance
    • Sample sizes used for test sets
    • Data provenance for test sets
    • Number of experts used to establish ground truth
    • Qualifications of experts
    • Adjudication methods
    • MRMC comparative effectiveness study results
    • Standalone performance results
    • Type of ground truth used
    • Sample size for the training set
    • How ground truth for the training set was established

    The document makes a direct statement that is crucial for understanding why these details are absent:

    "Clinical data therefore was not provided." (Section VII, page 2)

    The rationale for not providing clinical data is that:
    "The Lumenis One Family of Systems share the same indications for use and the same or similar technical specifications as the currently marketed predicate Lumenis Family of Intense Pulsed-Light (IPL) and IPL Nd: Y AG Laser Systems (K020839, K024093, K030342, K030527), the LightSheer Pulsed Diode Array Laser System (K973324, K974346, K982940, K001746, K003614), and the Aluma Skin Renewal System (K051214). The small differences that exist in certain technical specifications are not significant and they do not alter the safety or effectiveness of the Lumenis One Family of Systems." (Section VII, page 2)

    In summary, the device's acceptance criteria were implicitly met by demonstrating substantial equivalence to already cleared predicate devices, without the need for new clinical performance studies or establishing new acceptance criteria and demonstrating compliance.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1