Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(276 days)
The Pro-X1™ Trochanteric Nailing System is intended for use in fracture fixation in the femur in adults with osteopenia or osteoporosis. The Pro-X1™ Trochanteric Nailing System is indicated for use in:
- · Intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures
- · Segmental fractures
- Comminuted fractures
- Pathological fractures
- · Fractures with bone loss
- · Pseudoarthrosis, non-union, mal-union, and delayed union
- · Surgically created defects such as osteotomies
The Pro-X1" Trochanteric Nailing System is a single use device intended for long-term implantation into the femur. The Pro-X1™ Trochanteric Nailing System consists of the following components:
- . Pro-X1™ Expanding Bolt: is a metal expanding hip bolt available in various lengths.
- Pro-X1"" Trochanteric Nail: is a metal intramedullary (IM) nail which is designed ● to be used in conjunction with the Pro-X1"" Expanding Bolt to provide fixation of fractures of the femur. It is available in various lengths, in right and left configurations.
- Set-Screw: The set-screw prevents the Pro-X1™ Expanding Bolt from rotating, while ● still allowing for dynamic movement.
- Interlocking Screws: The interlocking screws are used in conjunction with the Pro-● X1" Trochanteric Nail to achieve distal fixation of the nail. The interlocking screws are available in various lengths.
This document describes the Pro-X1™ Trochanteric Nailing System, a device for fracture fixation in the femur. However, the provided text does not contain the kind of information that would be used to assess the performance of an AI/ML medical device, such as acceptance criteria, sample sizes for test/training sets, expert qualifications, or details about standalone or MRMC studies.
The document is a 510(k) summary for a physical medical device (an intramedullary rod system), not an AI/ML-driven diagnostic or prognostic tool. The performance data presented refers to non-clinical bench testing for mechanical properties, not clinical accuracy or utility in an AI context.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information in the format of AI/ML device performance.
The "acceptance criteria" discussed in the document are about the mechanical performance of the physical device (e.g., fatigue, bending, torque, pull-out strength) and its substantial equivalence to a predicate device based on these mechanical characteristics.
Here’s a summary of what is available in the document, which pertains to a traditional medical device:
Device: Pro-X1™ Trochanteric Nailing System
Intended Use: Fracture fixation in the femur in adults with osteopenia or osteoporosis.
Predicate Device: X-BOLT IM Hip Nail System (K181640)
Reference Device (for comparison, but not direct predicate): Howmedica Osteonics Corp.'s Gamma 3 Nail System (K034002)
Non-Clinical Performance Data (Bench Testing):
Test | Standard/Basis | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|---|
Gliding hip nail fatigue test | EPI-19 based on ISO 7206-4 | Met pre-determined acceptance criteria |
Static four-point bending test | ASTM F1264 | Met pre-determined acceptance criteria |
Dynamic four-point bending test | ASTM F1264 | Met pre-determined acceptance criteria |
Torsional yield testing of the bone screw | ASTM F543 | Met pre-determined acceptance criteria |
Insertion torque testing of the bone screw | ASTM F543 | Met pre-determined acceptance criteria |
Pull-out testing of the bone screw | ASTM F543 | Met pre-determined acceptance criteria |
Torque testing to expand X-Bolt | Not specified | Met pre-determined acceptance criteria |
Fatigue bending strength testing of X-Bolt | Not specified | Met pre-determined acceptance criteria |
Characterization of coating adhesion | Not specified | Met pre-determined acceptance criteria |
Substantial Equivalence Conclusion: The Pro-X1™ Trochanteric Nailing System is substantially equivalent to the X-BOLT IM Hip Nail System (K181640) based on:
- Same intended use
- Same fundamental scientific technology
- Similar functional and technological characteristics via similar operational principles
- Evaluation of risk and performance data demonstrating it is as safe and effective for its intended use.
Missing Information (as pertains to AI/ML device assessment):
- A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance (in an AI/ML context)
- Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance
- Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications
- Adjudication method for the test set
- If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, and the effect size of human readers improving with AI vs without AI assistance
- If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
- The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
- The sample size for the training set
- How the ground truth for the training set was established
This document describes a traditional medical device and its mechanical testing, not an AI/ML product.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1