Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K052403
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2005-09-15

    (14 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    892.2050
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K023322, K033004

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Coronis 2MP-21" is intended to be used in displaying and viewing digital images for review by trained medical practitioners. These devices must not be used in primary image diagnosis in mammography.

    The MFGD 2621 is intended to be used in displaying and viewing digital images for review by trained medical practitioners. These devices must not be used in primary image diagnosis in mammography.

    Device Description

    Coronis 2MP-21" is a display system for medical viewing. It consists of 3 components: MFGD 2621 is a 21.3" grayscale LCD display. BarcoMed Coronis is a fast high-resolution display controller board that plugs into a PACS workstation computer. MediCal Pro is user-friendly softcopy OA software. The display system can be a single-head system or multi-head system. In the last case it ontains multiple displays and display controller boards.

    MFGD 2621 is a 21.3" grayscale LCD display for medical viewing. It is combined with MediCal Pro, a user-friendly softcopy QA software.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes two devices, Coronis 2MP-21" and MFGD 2621, both intended for displaying medical images. However, the document does not detail any specific acceptance criteria or study results that prove the devices meet such criteria.

    The 510(k) summaries primarily focus on establishing substantial equivalence to predicate devices (Coronis 2MP and MFGD 2320, respectively) based on technological characteristics, general function, application, and intended use. The conclusion for both devices explicitly states: "Any difference between both devices does not affect safety or efficacy." This implies that the devices are considered safe and effective because they are similar enough to already-approved devices, rather than through independent studies against predefined performance metrics.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information regarding acceptance criteria, reported device performance, sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, or ground truth details for either a test set or training set. These elements are not present in the provided document.

    The document is a 510(k) premarket notification for substantial equivalence, which often relies on a comparison to a predicate device rather than presenting new study data with acceptance criteria and performance metrics.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1