Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K060046
    Device Name
    DERMASTREAM
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2006-02-27

    (52 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4020
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K020781, K973036, K901845, K021501

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The DermaStream™ is an occlusive wound dressing which permits the introduction of topical wound treatments such as irrigating solutions, antimicrobial and enzymatic debriding solutions, suspensions, and other solutions. It is intended to provide a moist healing environment and allow debridement to facilitate the normal wound healing process.

    Device Description

    The DermaStream™ is an occlusive wound dressing which permits the introduction of topical wound treatments. It is provided as a sterile, single-use, disposable device.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes a 510(k) summary for a medical device (DermaStream™ occlusive wound dressing) but does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving device performance against such criteria.

    The document focuses on:

    • Device Identification: Name, classification, manufacturer, contact.
    • Predicate Devices: Identifying similar legally marketed devices (KCI Wound Cell Transparent Wound Dressing, 3M Tegaderm Transparent Dressing, KCI V.A.C. Instillamat).
    • Device Description: An occlusive wound dressing permitting topical wound treatment introduction, sterile, single-use, disposable.
    • Intended Use: To provide a moist healing environment and allow debridement to facilitate normal wound healing.
    • Technological Characteristics Comparison: Stating it is substantially equivalent to predicate devices, being a combination of their features, with the primary difference being solution/drainage provision via gravity vs. vacuum.
    • FDA Correspondence: Confirming the substantial equivalence determination.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested table or elaborations on the study details because the necessary information is not present in the provided text. The document is essentially a regulatory submission summary, not a performance study report.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1