Search Results

The Mederi Therapeutics RF Generator is intended for general use in the electrosurgical coagulation of tissue, specifically:

• The Mederi RF Generator when used with the Secca Disposable Handpiece is intended for the treatment of bowel incontinence in patients with incontinence to solid or liquid stool at least once per week and who have failed more conservative therapy.
• The Mederi RF Generator when used with the Stretta Disposable Catheter is intended for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

The Mederi Therapeutics RF Generator Control Module is a Radio Frequency Generator which is used with the Stretta and Secca disposable hand pieces and accessories including irrigation tubing and foot pedal. The Mederi Therapeutics RF Generator Control Module is part of a therapeutic platform for treatment of various medical conditions with radiofrequency (RF) energy. Specifically. for the treatment of two conditions:

• Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Mederi's devices used for treatment of this condition include the Mederi RF generator and the "Stretta" disposable kit.
• Fecal Incontinence (FI). Mederi's devices used for treatment of this condition include the Mederi generator and the "Secca" disposable kit.
  The Mederi RF Generator Control Module is a multi-channel electrosurgical generator that produces low power, radiofrequency (RF) energy using a sinusoidal waveform of 460 kHz. Needle tip and surface tissue temperatures are measured through disposable hand pieces during treatment by thermocouples located at the tip and base of the needle, respectively. The electrode tip temperature measurement regulates the output power in a closed-loop fashion to maintain the target temperature, while monitoring of the surface tissue temperature prevents overheating.

The provided text does not contain detailed acceptance criteria or a specific study proving the device meets those criteria with statistical data, sample sizes, or expert qualifications. The document is a 510(k) summary, which focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices rather than providing a detailed performance study report.

However, based on the information available, here's what can be extracted and inferred:

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance

The acceptance criteria are not explicitly quantified in the provided text. Instead, the document generally states that "Verification testing of the Mederi Therapeutics RF Generator Control Module demonstrated that the device met the acceptance criteria." The performance testing focused on ensuring the modified RF Generator Control Module performed as intended and was substantially equivalent to predicate devices.

Here's a table summarizing the types of performance aspects tested, which would imply associated acceptance criteria, although the specific numerical targets are not given.

Detailed Response to Specific Questions:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:

   • See the table above. It lists the categories of testing and the general statement of "Met acceptance criteria" or "Demonstrated substantial equivalence" as the reported performance, as specific quantitative criteria and results are not provided.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

   • The document does not specify sample sizes for any of the performance tests.
   • The data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective) is also not mentioned. The testing appears to be internal verification and validation against specified design requirements rather than a clinical study with patient data.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

   • This information is not provided. The performance testing described (e.g., software review, electrical safety) suggests engineering and regulatory compliance testing rather than clinical evaluation requiring expert ground truth establishment in a diagnostic context.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:

   • An adjudication method is not mentioned. This type of method is typically used in clinical trials or studies where there are subjective assessments by multiple reviewers. The tests described are primarily objective engineering and performance verification.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

   • No MRMC study was conducted or mentioned. This device is an electrosurgical generator, not an AI-assisted diagnostic or imaging system, so such a study would not be relevant.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

   • The device itself is a "Control Module" for an RF generator, implying it always operates in conjunction with human operation (human-in-the-loop) for therapeutic procedures. The "Software Code Review and performance testing on the Software Control Module (CM)" could be considered a form of standalone evaluation of the algorithm/software component. However, the overall device performance tests, especially those involving "Stretta Module" and "Secca Module," imply the software's functionality within the complete system, which is human-controlled.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):

   • For the engineering and performance tests (e.g., energy output, impedance, pump function, electrical safety), the "ground truth" would be established by engineering specifications, regulatory standards (e.g., IEC standards for electrical safety), and design requirements. There's no indication of ground truth based on expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data, as this is not a diagnostic device.

8. The sample size for the training set:

   • There is no mention of a training set. This device is a hardware and software system for electrosurgical coagulation, not a machine learning or AI algorithm that requires a training set in the conventional sense. The "Software Control Module" was developed and verified, but not "trained" on data.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

   • Not applicable, as there is no training set mentioned or implied for this device.

Ask a specific question about this device