Search Results

The Mobile Millennium MG Imaging System is intended for use as a diagnostic imaging system which, when used with appropriate radiopharmaceuticals, produces images representative of the internal distribution of radioactivity in the head or body. It is designed to acquire, display, process, archive, and communicate data for whole body, planar, tomographic (SPECT), multislice, and attenuation corrected images. The system allows for the acquisition of data for high resolution three dimensional, static, gated, or dynamic images of biochemical and metabolic processes. It can be operated in a mobile as well as a fixed site environment.

The GE Millennium Mobile MG System is composed of a gantry, patient table, image acquisition hardware and software, an operator console, a processing and review workstation, and associated accessories. Materials and construction are equivalent to the Millennium MG System and eNTEGRA Workstation and are compliant with CISPR 11, IEC 801, UL2601-1, IEC 60601-1 and associated collateral standards, and applicable sections of 21 CFR Subchapter J.

The provided text does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving that the device meets specific performance criteria. The document is a 510(k) summary for a medical device (Millennium Mobile MG Imaging System and eNTEGRA Workstation) and primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device.

The "Summary of Studies" section states: "The device has been evaluated for electrical, mechanical, and radiation safety, and conforms to applicable medical device safety and performance standards." However, it does not provide:

• A table of specific acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
• Details about sample sizes, data provenance, ground truth establishment, expert qualifications, or adjudication methods for any performance studies.
• Information on MRMC comparative effectiveness studies or standalone algorithm performance.

Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for the detailed information regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets them based on the provided text.

Ask a specific question about this device

eNTEGRA PE is designed to display, process, archive, and communicate data required and stored by Emission Tomography cameras and Nuclear Medicine/PET workstations. It is intended that use of the device be limited to review of studies, tagging images for detailed reading, determining whether the correct images were captured, and similar uses. The limited image size availble on eNTEGRA PE has not been fully demonstrated to be suitable for diagnostic use, and it is not intended to be used for direct diagnosis.

The eNTEGRA PE Diagnostic Imaging Personal Digital Assistant is a device intended to provide the same functionality as the eNTEGRA Workstation (cleared in 510(k) number K000395 as the "Einstein Processing And Review Workstation"). The eNTEGRA PE is different in that this functionality is implemented on a handheld personal computer or personal digital assistant (PDA). The eNTEGRA PE will extend the eNTEGRA P&R services to be utilized by the clinician while away from her office/desk.

This 510(k) submission describes the eNTEGRA PE, a personal digital assistant (PDA) intended to provide similar functionality to the existing eNTEGRA Workstation (K000395) for displaying, processing, archiving, and communicating data from Emission Tomography cameras and Nuclear Medicine/PET workstations.

The submission does not contain specific acceptance criteria with quantifiable metrics, nor does it present a detailed study with performance outcomes against such criteria for the eNTEGRA PE beyond a general statement. The submission is focused on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device.

Here's the information extracted and organized based on your request, with explicit notes about what is not present in the provided document:

1. Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

2. Sample Size and Data Provenance for Test Set

• Sample Size (Test Set): "representative sample images" are mentioned for bench testing, but the specific number or characteristics of these images are not provided.
• Data Provenance: Not specified in the document (e.g., country of origin, retrospective or prospective).

3. Number and Qualifications of Experts for Ground Truth (Test Set)

• Not applicable. The document describes bench testing for functionality rather than a clinical study requiring expert-established ground truth for diagnostic accuracy.

4. Adjudication Method for Test Set

• Not applicable. The document does not describe a process involving adjudication of results from a test set by multiple experts.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

• No. A MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not performed as described in this document. The submission focuses on functional equivalence through bench testing.

6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance Study

• Yes, implicitly. The "Bench testing with representative sample images" constitutes a standalone evaluation of the device's functionality. However, it's not a performance study in the sense of a diagnostic accuracy trial.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used (Test Set)

• The "ground truth" for the bench testing appears to be the expected/designed functionality of the eNTEGRA PE system. There is no mention of clinical ground truth (e.g., pathology, outcomes data, or expert consensus on patient diagnoses) for the test set.

8. Sample Size for Training Set

• Not applicable/not specified. This document describes a new device built upon existing technology and demonstrated through bench testing for functional equivalence. It does not mention machine learning or AI models requiring a training set in the contemporary sense.

9. How Ground Truth for Training Set Was Established

• Not applicable. As above, no training set for a machine learning model is mentioned.

Ask a specific question about this device