Search Results
Found 3 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(211 days)
OZI
The Double Internal Joint Stabilizer - Elbow is intended to provide temporary stabilization of the elbow joint after trauma or chronic elbow dislocation.
The Predicate Internal Joint Stabilizer - Elbow (IJS-E) System consists of a titanium base plate, with the following components: A Distal Connecting Rod and Proximal Connecting Rod, held together by adjustable locking joints and locking screws which allow for multiple degrees of freedom. The Proximal Connecting Rod is secured to the distal humerus at the axis of rotation using a cobalt chrome axis pin provided in multiple lengths from 30mm to 70mm in 5mm increments.
The subject Double Internal Joint Stabilizer - Elbow (IJS-E) System is modifying the predicate IJS-E Base Plate to add an additional set of components to the other side of the IJS-E Base plate. The Proximal Connecting Rods from each side of the Double IJS-E base plate are secured to the distal humerus at the axis of rotation using the predicate male axis pin from one side and the new female axis pin from the other side. The male axis pin telescopes within the female axis pin within the distal humerus.
The subject Double Internal Joint Stabilizer - Elbow Base Plate is attached to the Ulna by the same 3.5mm compression screws as the predicate IJS-E system (K153208). The modified system provides internal stabilization to the elbow joint in the same manner, function, and technology as the Company's cleared Internal Joint Stabilizer - Elbow. The system includes specialized instrumentation.
The system is provided non-sterile and is sterilized in the user facility.
The provided text does not contain information about an AI/ML medical device, its acceptance criteria, or a study that proves the device meets those criteria. The document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a non-AI medical device, the "Double Internal Joint Stabilizer- Elbow."
Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request to describe the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them, as the provided text lacks the necessary information.
Ask a specific question about this device
(194 days)
OZI
The Internal Joint Stabilizer- Elbow is intended to provide temporary stabilization of the elbow joint after trauma or chronic elbow dislocation.
The Skeletal Dynamic's Internal Joint Stabilizer Elbow System (K153208) consists of a titanium base plate, with a Distal Connecting Rod and Proximal Connecting Rod, held together by adjustable locking joints and locking screws which allow for multiple degrees of freedom. The system is being modified to include an Internal Joint Stabilizer - Elbow titanium base plate applied to the Company's cleared Proximal Ulna Plates of the Distal Elbow Plating System (K171590), instead of directly to the ulna as does the base plate of the cleared Internal Joint Stabilizer Elbow System.
The subject Internal Joint Stabilizer- Elbow is attached to the cleared Proximal Ulna Plates by means of two #4-40 cobalt chrome screws of 5.5mm in length and the Proximal Connecting Rod is secured to the distal humerus at the axis of rotation using the cleared cobalt chrome axis pin provided in multiple lengths from 30mm to 70mm in 5mm increments. The modified system provides internal stabilization to the elbow joint in the same manner, function, and technology as the Company's cleared Internal Joint Stabilizer Elbow. The system includes specialized instrumentation.
When attached to the cleared Skeletal Dynamics proximal ulna plate, the Internal Joint Stabilizer Elbow sits on the same anatomical location over the ulna and under the musculature and soft tissue, as does the cleared Internal Joint Stabilizer - Elbow.
The system is provided non-sterile and is sterilized in the user facility.
The provided document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification from the FDA for a medical device called the "Internal Joint Stabilizer - Elbow." It describes the device, its intended use, and the basis for its substantial equivalence to a predicate device.
However, this document does not contain information on acceptance criteria for a study demonstrating device performance of a new or modified device against specific performance metrics for clinical or AI-based devices. Instead, it focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence through mechanical testing and engineering analysis compared to a predicate device.
Therefore, I cannot provide a table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance related to clinical outcomes, nor can I describe study details like sample size for test sets, data provenance, number of experts for ground truth, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, or training set details. This type of information is typically associated with studies demonstrating clinical efficacy or the performance of AI/ML-based diagnostic devices, which is not the subject of this 510(k) notification.
The document states:
- Performance Testing: "Engineering analysis and mechanical testing demonstrated that the Skeletal Dynamic's Internal Joint Stabilizer Elbow is equivalent to its predicate device currently marketed. Mechanical testing which established equivalency included static and fatigue testing of the construct applied to Skeletal Dynamic's cleared Proximal Ulna Plate."
- Conclusions: "The Skeletal Dynamic's Internal Joint Stabilizer - Elbow is substantially equivalent to the Internal Joint Stabilizer Elbow predicate device identified in this premarket notification."
The "study" in this context refers to the mechanical and engineering tests to show the modified device performs similarly to the predicate device in terms of structural integrity and function, not clinical or diagnostic accuracy. There is no mention of an algorithm or AI component in this device.
Ask a specific question about this device
(56 days)
OZI
The Internal Joint Stabilizer – Elbow is intended to provide temporary stabilization of the elbow joint after trauma or chronic elbow dislocation.
The Skeletal Dynamics Internal Joint Stabilizer – Elbow is an internal elbow fixator, with three principal components:
- A Base Plate assembly consisting of a low profile Base Plate, contoured to fit within . the flat surface of ulna at the olecranon process; a Connecting Rod, a Boom and two Locking Joints designed to bridge over the anconeous muscle. The Connecting Rod and Boom are adjustable by means of the Locking Joints to accommodate different patient anatomies. The Base Plate assembly is made of titanium alloy and cobalt chrome.
- A cobalt chrome Axis Pin threads through the Boom of the Base Plate assembly and ● is inserted in the axis of rotation of the humerus, and
- . Titanium compression screws to attach the Base Plate Assembly to the ulna.
Specialized instrumentation includes Axis Trajectory Guides (available in 3 sizes), K- Wire Guide, K-Wires, Depth Gauges, Drills, a Counter-torque tool, and a T-10 driver and quick connect handle.
The Internal Joint Stabilizer - Elbow is intended to be removed once the elbow ligaments have healed, usually within 6 - 8 weeks after implantation.
The system is provided non-sterile and is sterilized in the user facility.
The provided document describes the FDA 510(k) premarket notification for the "Internal Joint Stabilizer - Elbow" device. The acceptance criteria and the study proving the device meets them are detailed under "Performance Data" and "Clinical Study" sections.
Here’s a breakdown of the requested information based on the provided text:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
| Acceptance Criteria (from "Primary Efficacy Objective") | Reported Device Performance (from "Clinical Study") |
|---|---|
| Primary Efficacy Objective: | |
| Confirmation that the IJS-E provides temporary stabilization of the elbow joint and allows functional recovery after trauma or chronic dislocation as effectively as hinged external fixation, defined as: | Out of 24 subjects who completed the study: |
| a. Broberg Morrey Functional Rating was fair or better at six months post explant. | 23 out of 24 (95.83%) had a Broberg Morrey Functional Rating of Fair or better (95% Cl: 78.87%, 99.89%). |
| b. No recurrent dislocation occurred during use of the Internal Joint Stabilizer – Elbow or after its removal. | 23 out of 24 subjects (95.83%) did not have recurrent dislocations (95% Cl: 78.87%, 99.89%). |
| Primary Safety Objective: | |
| Confirmation that the IJS-E does not contribute to a greater number of device related adverse events than hinged external fixation. | The Internal Joint Stabilizer – Elbow did not contribute to a greater number of device related adverse events than the hinged external fixator studied in the retrospective data review. Only one device-related AE (Axis Pin back out) and one study-related AE (malreduction) were reported. |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
- Test Set (Clinical Study):
- Sample Size: 26 subjects enrolled (26 consented and screened). 24 subjects completed the study.
- Data Provenance: Prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, cohort study conducted at 6 sites in the US.
- Comparator Data (for outcomes comparison):
- Sample Size: Not explicitly stated for the retrospective cohort, but referred to as "a retrospective cohort of subjects who underwent external hinged fixation."
- Data Provenance: Retrospective data from a major metropolitan hospital in the US.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
The document does not explicitly mention "experts" establishing ground truth in the context of radiologists or specific medical professionals rating images. Instead, the "ground truth" for the clinical study's efficacy was based on:
- Broberg Morrey Functional Rating: This is a standardized outcome measure for elbow function, typically assessed by clinicians as part of patient follow-up.
- Recurrent Dislocation: An objective clinical event, which would be determined by treating physicians.
- Device-related Adverse Events: Reported by treating physicians and/or study investigators.
The qualifications of the individuals who assessed these outcomes (e.g., the clinicians using the Broberg Morrey score or reporting adverse events) are not specified beyond their role in conducting a clinical study at "6 sites in the US."
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
The document does not describe any specific adjudication method (like 2+1 or 3+1 consensus) for the clinical outcomes or adverse events in the clinical study.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study involving "human readers" and "AI assistance" was not conducted. This study is for an internal joint stabilizer device, not an AI-powered diagnostic tool. The comparison was between the device's clinical outcomes and those of a predicate external hinged fixator.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This is a medical device, an internal joint stabilizer, not a software algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
The ground truth for the clinical study was based on clinical outcomes data (Broberg Morrey Functional Rating, incidence of recurrent dislocation) and safety data (device-related adverse events).
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. This is a medical device, not a machine learning algorithm that requires a "training set." The study evaluated the device performance in human subjects, which serves as the "test set" for its clinical effectiveness and safety.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable, as there is no "training set" in the context of an AI/algorithm.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1