Search Filters

Search Results

Found 3 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K033864
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2004-04-02

    (112 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    866.2660
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Product Code :

    JWZ

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The OSOM® Trichomonas Rapid Test is intended for the qualitative detection of Trichomonas vaginalis ("Trichomonas") antigens from vaginal swabs and from the saline solution prepared when making wet mounts from vaginal swabs. This test is intended for use in patients with symptoms of vaginosis/vaginitis or suspected exposure to the Trichomonas pathogen. This device is intended for use in physicians' offices as well as clinical laboratories.

    Device Description

    The OSOM Trichomonas Rapid Test uses color immunochromatographic, capillary flow, "dipstick" technology with antibodies coated on a nitrocellulose membrane. The test procedure requires the solubilization of Trichomonas proteins from a vaginal swab by placing it in a Sample Buffer. The OSOM Trichomonas Rapid Test is then placed in the Sample Buffer, and the mixture migrates along the membrane surface. If Trichomonas is present in the sample, it will form a complex with the primary anti-Trichomonas antibody conjugated to colored particles (blue). The complex will then be bound by the second anti-Trichomonas capture antibody. The appearance of a visible blue test line together with the red control line indicates a positive result.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's an analysis of the provided text to extract the acceptance criteria and study details for the OSOM® Trichomonas Rapid Test:

    Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance for OSOM® Trichomonas Rapid Test

    The provided document describes the performance of the OSOM® Trichomonas Rapid Test against a composite reference standard (CRS) that includes wet mount microscopy and culture. The acceptance criteria themselves are not explicitly stated as distinct numerical targets required for approval, but rather the observed performance metrics are presented. For the purpose of this response, I will interpret the reported agreement, sensitivity, and specificity as the metrics against which the device's performance was judged.

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    MetricAcceptance Criteria (Implied)Reported Device Performance
    SensitivitySufficiently high for diagnosis83% (85/102)
    SpecificitySufficiently high for diagnosis99% (331/335)
    AgreementSufficiently high for diagnosis95% (416/437)

    Note: The document does not specify explicit numerical "acceptance criteria" that were pre-defined. The "acceptance criteria (implied)" column reflects the general expectation for diagnostic assays to demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity for their intended use.

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    • Sample Size (Test Set): 437 samples (102 positive, 335 negative based on composite reference standard).
    • Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated. The document does not mention the country of origin of the data or whether it was retrospective or prospective.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications

    • Number of Experts: Not specified. The ground truth was established using an objective composite reference standard (wet mount microscopy and culture), not solely based on expert interpretation. While these diagnostic methods are performed by trained personnel, the document doesn't detail the number of individuals involved or their specific qualifications for this study.
    • Qualifications of Experts: Not specified.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    • Adjudication Method: A composite reference standard (CRS) was used. This means that a sample was classified as positive if it tested positive by either wet mount microscopy or culture. Conversely, a sample was classified as negative only if it tested negative by both wet mount microscopy and culture. This method effectively adjudicates discrepancies by prioritizing positive findings from either established method as indicative of true positivity.

    5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

    • MRMC Study Done: No. The study described is a standalone performance evaluation of the OSOM® Trichomonas Rapid Test against a reference standard. There is no mention of human readers or comparing their performance with and without AI assistance.

    6. Standalone Performance Study

    • Standalone Performance Study Done: Yes. The reported performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, and agreement) are for the OSOM® Trichomonas Rapid Test itself, without human-in-the-loop interaction for interpretation beyond the initial sample preparation and visual reading of the test line.

    7. Type of Ground Truth Used

    • Type of Ground Truth: Composite Reference Standard (CRS). This standard combined the results of:
      • Wet mount microscopy
      • InPouch TV™ culture (BioMed Diagnostics Inc.)
        A sample was considered positive if either wet mount or culture was positive, and negative if both were negative.

    8. Sample Size for the Training Set

    • Sample Size (Training Set): Not applicable. This device is a rapid immunochromatographic test, not an AI/machine learning algorithm requiring a separate training set. Its performance is based on its inherent biochemical and immunological properties.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    • How Ground Truth for Training Set Was Established: Not applicable, as there is no training set for this type of device.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K020595
    Date Cleared
    2003-02-20

    (363 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    866.2660
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Product Code :

    JWZ

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Xenotope Diagnostics' Inc. XenoStrip™-Tv Trichomonas Cassette Test is intended for the qualitative detection of Trichomonas vaginalis ("Trichomonas") antigens from vaginal swabs. This test is intended for use in patients with symptoms of vaginosis/vaginitis or suspected exposure to the Trichomonas pathogen.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a device called "XenoStrip-TVTM Trichomonas Cassette Test". It does not contain information about acceptance criteria, study details, or performance data for the device. The letter primarily states that the device has been found substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices and can therefore be marketed.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information from this document.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K020226
    Date Cleared
    2002-08-22

    (212 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    866.2660
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Product Code :

    JWZ

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Xenotope Diagnostics Inc. XenoStrip™-Tv Trichomonas Test is Intended for the qualitative detection of Trichomonas vaginalis ("Trichomonas") antigens from vaginal swabs. Early detection and treatment of trichomonas-related diseases (vaginitis, trichomoniasis) is useful in the prevention and reduction of disease and disease symptomology.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    This is a letter issued by the FDA regarding the 510(k) premarket notification for the "Xenotope Diagnostics Inc. XenoStrip™-Tv Trichomonas Test."

    Based on the provided document, the device described is a rapid, qualitative immunoassay for the detection of Trichomonas vaginalis antigens from vaginal swabs. The FDA letter confirms that the device is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices.

    However, the provided document does not contain any information regarding acceptance criteria, study details, sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, or ground truth establishment. This letter is a regulatory approval, not a scientific study report.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for a table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance or other study-related details based on the provided text. To answer your questions, I would need a different type of document, such as a summary of safety and effectiveness, a clinical study report, or the relevant sections from the 510(k) submission itself which would detail the performance studies.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1