Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K232353
    Date Cleared
    2023-08-31

    (24 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.6250
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The glove is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.

    Device Description

    The subject device is a patient examination glove made from nitrile latex compound, powder free and non-sterile (Per 21 CFR 880.6250, class I). They are ambidextrous and come in different sizes - Extra Small, Small, Medium, Large, Extra Large and XXL. The device meets all the specifications in ASTM D6319-19, Standard specification for Nitrile Examination Gloves.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) Summary for a medical device: "Powder Free Nitrile Examination Gloves (Black)". This document doesn't describe the kind of acceptance criteria or study that would have the information requested in your prompt (e.g., sample size for training sets, expert qualifications, MRMC studies, effect sizes). The submission is for a Class I general hospital and personal use device, which typically requires a demonstration of substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than extensive clinical efficacy studies.

    Instead, the document focuses on showing that the new device meets established ASTM and ISO standards for examination gloves and is substantially equivalent to another legally marketed glove.

    Here's the information that can be extracted relevant to acceptance criteria and performance, as much as possible:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    MethodologyTest PerformedAcceptance CriteriaResults
    ASTM D6319-19Physical Dimensions (Length)Minimum 230mm for all sizesPass
    ASTM D6319-19Physical Dimensions (Palm Width)XS: 70±10mm, S: 80±10mm, M: 95±10mm, L:110±10mm, XL: 120±10mm, XXL: 130±10mmPass
    ASTM D6319-19Physical Dimensions (Thickness)Finger: 0.05mm (min), Palm: 0.05mm (min)Pass
    ASTM D6319-19, ASTM D412-16(2021)Physical Properties (Tensile Strength)Min 14 MPaPass
    ASTM D6319-19, ASTM D412-16(2021)Physical Properties (Elongation before aging)Min 500%Pass
    ASTM D6319-19, ASTM D412-16(2021)Physical Properties (Elongation after aging)Min 400%Pass
    ASTM D6319-19, ASTM D5151-19Water leak testAQL 2.5 (ISO 2859-1)Pass
    ASTM D6319-19, ASTM D6124-06 (2017)Powder ResidueMax 2mg/glovePass
    ISO 10993-10 & 23:2021Irritation and Skin SensitizationNon-sensitization and Non-irritationIs non-sensitization and Non-irritation
    ISO 10993-5:2009CytotoxicityCytotoxicity reactivityshowed potential toxicity to L929 cells.
    ISO 10993-11:2017Acute systemic toxicity studyNo adverse biological reactionno evidence of systemic toxicity.

    Missing Information (Not applicable or not provided in the document for this type of device and submission):

    1. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not explicitly stated for each test. The tests refer to established standards (e.g., ASTM, ISO), which would define sample sizes within their methodologies. Data provenance is not mentioned.
    2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. The "ground truth" here is defined by compliance with established physical and biocompatibility standards, not expert consensus on diagnostic imaging.
    3. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable. This is not a study requiring human adjudication of results.
    4. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This is not an AI/imaging device.
    5. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done: Not applicable. This is not an AI/imaging device.
    6. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc): The ground truth is established by existing, widely recognized industry standards and test methods (ASTM and ISO standards) for physical properties and biocompatibility of examination gloves.
    7. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. This is not an AI/machine learning device.
    8. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable. This is not an AI/machine learning device.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1