Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K210097
    Device Name
    Estar-Z
    Date Cleared
    2021-07-02

    (169 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.6660
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Estar-Z is a ceramic intended to manufacture dental restorations, including inlays, artificial teeth, crowns and bridges.

    Device Description

    Estar-Z is a ceramic intended to manufacture dental restorations, including inlays, artificial teeth, crowns and bridges.

    Estar-Z is prefabricated ceramic block (pre-sintered yttrium-stabilized zirconium oxide) which is to be milled and sintered in the furnace to produce the final dental restorations. After sintering, it forms polycrytstalline oxide ceramic consisted of Tetragonal Zirconium Oxide Polycrystal (TZP).

    Estar-Z is provided in three types as Estar-Z T, Estar-Z HT, and Estar-Z ST. In accordance with ISO 6872:2015, Estar-Z T and Estar-Z HT are classified as Type II Class 5 zirconia and Estar-Z ST is classified as Type II Class 4b zirconia.

    Estar-Z is provided in non-sterile and available in various shades and thickness of disk shape (Ø98mm).

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) Summary for the dental ceramic device Estar-Z. It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices based on non-clinical testing. As such, it does not contain information about a study proving the device meets specific acceptance criteria using a human-in-the-loop or standalone AI performance evaluation. This document details the physical properties and biocompatibility of the ceramic material itself.

    Therefore, many of the requested elements for an AI device study (e.g., sample sizes of test sets, number of experts, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, training set details) are not applicable to the information provided in this document.

    However, I can extract the acceptance criteria and reported device performance for the physical properties of the ceramic material, as this is the focus of the substantial equivalence claim.

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The acceptance criteria are established by the ISO 6872:2015 standard for dentistry ceramic materials. The reported device performance is compared against these standards and the predicate devices.

    PropertyStandard/Acceptance Criteria (ISO 6872:2015)Estar-Z T & HT (reported)Estar-Z ST (reported)Predicate Device LUXEN Zr (K171585 - reported)Predicate Device LUXEN Smile (K171585 - reported)
    ClassificationType II Class 5 (for Estar-Z T & HT)MetN/AType II Class 5N/A
    Flexural Strength>800 MPa (for Type II Class 5)>800 MPaN/A1038 ± 135 MPa (for Type II Class 5)N/A
    ClassificationType II Class 4b (for Estar-Z ST)N/AMetN/AType II Class 4b
    Flexural Strength>500 MPa (for Type II Class 4b)N/A>500 MPaN/A770 ± 66 MPa (for Type II Class 4b)

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
    This information is not provided in the document. The document refers to non-clinical testing with "evaluation criteria" from ISO standards but does not specify sample sizes for these tests. Data provenance (country of origin, retrospective/prospective) is not applicable to material properties testing described.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
    Not applicable. Ground truth in this context refers to physical material properties measured according to established ISO standards, not expert interpretations of medical images or clinical data.

    4. Adjudication method for the test set
    Not applicable.

    5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
    Not applicable, as this is not an AI device.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
    Not applicable, as this is not an AI device.

    7. The type of ground truth used
    The ground truth used for performance evaluation of Estar-Z's physical properties are the specifications and requirements set forth by international standards, specifically ISO 6872:2015 for Dentistry Ceramic Materials and ISO 13356:2015 for Implants for surgery - Ceramic materials based on yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP).

    For biocompatibility, the ground truth is established by adherence to ISO 10993 series and ISO 7405 standards.

    8. The sample size for the training set
    Not applicable, as this is not an AI device that requires a training set.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
    Not applicable.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1