K Number
K171585
Manufacturer
Date Cleared
2018-10-31

(518 days)

Product Code
Regulation Number
872.6660
Panel
DE
Reference & Predicate Devices
AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

LUXEN Zr is indicated for the production of all-ceramic inlays, multi-units bridges, onlays, and veneers without zirconium dioxide frameworks. LUXEN Smile is indicated for the production of full ceramic crowns, onlays, 3bridges and inlay bridges (anterior and molar).

Device Description

LUXEN Zr and LUXEN Smile are used for custom made dental restorations using a CAD/CAM system. The LUXEN Zr and LUXEN Smile are provided in 4 different shapes - block, disk, Wieland and D-95. The LUXEN Zr is composed of 3 mol% TZP. LUXEN Smile is composed of 5 mol% TZP. The weight of yttria is classified in accordance with ISO 6872:2015 Type2, class 5 for 3Y-TZP Zirconia, and ISO 6872:2015 Type2, class 4b for 5Y-TZP Zirconia, respectively.

AI/ML Overview

The provided text describes the non-clinical performance testing of two dental devices, LUXEN Zr and LUXEN Smile, to demonstrate their substantial equivalence to predicate devices. However, the document does not contain information about an AI/ML device. Therefore, I cannot fulfill the request for information on acceptance criteria, a study proving device meeting acceptance criteria, sample sizes, data provenance, number of experts for ground truth, adjudication method, MRMC comparative effectiveness study, standalone performance, type of ground truth, or training set details as these are specific to AI/ML device evaluations.

The document focuses on the physical properties and biocompatibility of dental materials.

Here's a breakdown of what the document does provide regarding the non-clinical performance and acceptance criteria for these dental materials:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

The document provides comparative tables for LUXEN Zr vs. DD Bio ZX2 and LUXEN Smile vs. DD cube X2. These tables list various characteristics (such as flexural strength, chemical composition, thermal expansion coefficient, chemical solubility, etc.) and compare the subject device's performance against the predicate device or a relevant ISO standard. The acceptance criteria are implicitly defined by meeting or being similar to the predicate device's performance or exceeding minimum ISO standards.

LUXEN Zr (for 3Y-TZP Zirconia, ISO 6872:2015 Type2, Class 5)

CharacteristicAcceptance Criteria (Predicate/Standard)Reported Device Performance (LUXEN Zr)Outcome
Classification NamePorcelain powder for clinical usePorcelain powder for clinical useSimilar
Product CodeEIHEIHSimilar
Device ClassIIIISimilar
Blank configurationBlock, Disk, Wieland, D-95 typeBlock, Disk, Wieland, D-95 typeSimilar
Thicknesses10 mm to 25 mm10 mm to 25 mmSimilar
Crystal Morphology3Y-TZP3Y-TZPSimilar
ColorVITA shade guide metVITA shade guide metSimilar
Sintering temperature1450 °C (predicate)LUXEN Zr ST: 1580 °C, Others: 1500 °CSimilar (optimized for translucency)
Types, Class (ISO6872:2015)Type II Class 5Type II Class 5Similar
Chemical composition (wt.%)Meet ISO 13356 (e.g., Al2O3 ≤ 0.5%)Meets ISO 13356Similar
Flexural strength (MPa)1250 (predicate) / >800 MPa (ISO)1038 ± 135Similar (higher than ISO)
Thermal expansion coeff.10 X 10-6 K-110.7 X 10-6 K-1Similar
**Chemical solubility (µg/cm²) **Not listed (predicate)0-
BiocompatibilityISO 10993 and ISO 7405Biocompatible per ISO 10993-1Similar
SterileNon-sterileNon-sterileSimilar

LUXEN Smile (for 5Y-TZP Zirconia, ISO 6872:2015 Type2, Class 4b)

CharacteristicAcceptance Criteria (Predicate/Standard)Reported Device Performance (LUXEN Smile)Outcome
Classification NamePorcelain powder for clinical usePorcelain powder for clinical useSimilar
Product CodeEIHEIHSimilar
Device ClassIIIISimilar
Blank configurationDisk, Wieland typeBlock, Disk, Wieland, D-95 typeSimilar
Thicknesses10 mm to 25 mm10 mm to 25 mmSimilar
Crystal Morphology5Y-TZP5Y-TZPSimilar
ColorVITA shade guide metVITA shade guide metSimilar
Sintering temperature1450 °C1450 °CSimilar
Types, Class (ISO6872:2015)Type II Class 4 (predicate, ISO 6872:2008)Type II Class 4b (ISO 6872:2015)Similar
Chemical compositionMeet ISO 13356 (e.g., Al2O3 ≤ 0.5%)Meets ISO 13356Similar
Flexural strength> 750-800 MPa (predicate) / >500 MPa (ISO)770 ± 66 MPaSimilar (higher than ISO)
Thermal expansion coeff.10 X 10-6 K-110.3 X 10-6 K-1Similar
Chemical solubility15 μg/cm² (predicate) / >2000 μg/cm² (ISO)0 μg/cm²Similar (better than predicate and ISO)
BiocompatibilityEN ISO 10993-1, -5Biocompatible per ISO 10993-1Similar
SterileNon-sterileNon-sterileSimilar

2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

The document does not specify the sample sizes for each non-clinical test (e.g., number of specimens for flexural strength, chemical solubility). It also does not mention the country of origin of the data or whether the tests were retrospective or prospective.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

This is not applicable as the study involves physical and biocompatibility testing of dental materials, not an AI/ML device requiring expert ground truth for interpretation.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

This is not applicable for non-clinical material testing.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

This is not applicable. This document is not about an AI device.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done

This is not applicable. This document is not about an AI device.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert concensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

For the non-clinical tests, the "ground truth" is established by the measurement outcomes of validated physical and chemical tests, and comparison against international standards (e.g., ISO 6872:2015, ISO 13356) and the characteristics of predicate devices. Biocompatibility uses established ISO 10993 series standards as the "ground truth" for safe biological interaction.

8. The sample size for the training set

This is not applicable as the document describes non-clinical testing of a dental material, not an AI/ML algorithm.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

This is not applicable as the document describes non-clinical testing of a dental material, not an AI/ML algorithm.

§ 872.6660 Porcelain powder for clinical use.

(a)
Identification. Porcelain powder for clinical use is a device consisting of a mixture of kaolin, felspar, quartz, or other substances intended for use in the production of artificial teeth in fixed or removable dentures, of jacket crowns, facings, and veneers. The device is used in prosthetic dentistry by heating the powder mixture to a high temperature in an oven to produce a hard prosthesis with a glass-like finish.(b)
Classification. Class II.