Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K182600
    Date Cleared
    2018-11-30

    (70 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.6250
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Powder Free Nitrile Examination Gloves, Tested for Use with Chemotherapy Drugs (Blue) is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand to prevent contamination between patient and examiner. Gloves have been tested for use with chemotherapy drugs using ASTM D6978 and will be labeled with a statement of compliance and a summary of the testing results.

    Device Description

    Powder Free Nitrile Examination Gloves, Tested for Use with Chemotherapy Drugs (Blue) are Class I Patient Examination Gloves and Specialty Chemotherapy Gloves. They are ambidextrous and come in different sizes-Extra Small, Medium, Large and Extra Large. Gloves meet the specification of ASTM D6319-10(2015) and have been tested for resistance to permeation by chemotherapy drugs as per ASTM D6978-05(2013).

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) summary for the "Powder Free Nitrile Examination Gloves, Tested for Use with Chemotherapy Drugs (Blue)". It describes the device, its intended use, and comparative testing against a predicate device.

    Here's the breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The device performance is primarily evaluated against two standards: ASTM D6319-10(2015) for Nitrile Examination Gloves (General Characteristics) and ASTM D6978-05(2013) for Chemotherapy Drug Permeation. Specific acceptance criteria are not explicitly stated for all parameters, but rather the performance of the proposed device is compared to the predicate device and relevant ASTM standards.

    The table below summarizes the key performance characteristics and reported results. For characteristics not explicitly having acceptance criteria listed as a specific number, the "Comparison" column indicates if the device is "Same" or "Similar" to the predicate, implying it meets comparable performance.

    Test Parameter / Acceptance Criteria (as per ASTM standards or comparison)Reported Device Performance (Proposed Device K182600)
    General Characteristics (ASTM D6319-10(2015))
    LengthMinimum 230mm
    Palm Width (XS)$70\pm10$ mm
    Palm Width (S)$80\pm10$ mm
    Palm Width (M)$95\pm10$ mm
    Palm Width (L)$110\pm10$ mm
    Palm Width (XL)$120\pm10$ mm
    Thickness (Finger)Minimum 0.05 mm
    Thickness (Palm)Minimum 0.05 mm
    Tensile Strength, Before Aging14MPa, min
    Ultimate Elongation, Before Aging500%, min
    Tensile Strength, After Accelerated Aging14MPa, min
    Ultimate Elongation, After Accelerated Aging400%, min
    Freedom from holes (ASTM D 5151-06, AQL 2.5)In accordance with ASTM D 5151-06, following ASTM D6319-10, G-1, AQL 2.5
    Powder-Content$\le2$ mg per glove
    Biocompatibility (ISO 10993)
    ISO 10993-10:2010 Skin Irritation StudyNot an irritant
    ISO 10993-10:2010 Maximization Sensitization StudyNot a sensitizer
    ISO 10993-5:2009 Cytotoxicity TestNot a cytotoxic potential
    Chemotherapy Drug Permeation (ASTM D6978-05(2013))Minimum Breakthrough Detection Time (Minutes)
    Carmustine(BCNU) (3.3 mg/ml)11.0
    Cisplatin (1mg/ml)>240
    Cyclophosphamide (20mg/ml)>240
    Dacarbazine (DTIC) (10mg/ml)>240
    Doxorubicin Hydrochloride (2mg/ml)>240
    Etoposide (Toposar) (20mg/ml)>240
    Fluorouracil (50mg/ml)>240
    Methotrexate (25mg/ml)>240
    Paclitaxel (Taxol) (6mg/ml)>240
    Thiotepa (THT) (10mg/ml)28.8
    Bleomycin (15.0mg/ml)>240
    Busulfan (6.0mg/ml)>240
    Carboplatin, (10.0mg/ml)>240
    Chloroquine, (50.0mg/ml)>240
    Cyclosporin, (100.0mg/ml)>240
    Cytarabine, (100.0mg/ml)>240
    Daunorubicin, (5.0mg/ml)>240
    Docetaxel, (10.0mg/ml)>240
    Epirubicin (Ellence), (2.0mg/ml)>240
    Fludarabine, (25.0mg/ml)>240
    Gemcitabine (Gemzar) (38.0mg/ml)>240
    Idarubicin, (1.0mg/ml)>240
    Ifosfamide, (50.0mg/ml)>240
    Irinotecan, (20.0mg/ml)>240
    Mechlorethamine HCI, (1.0mg/ml)>240
    Melphalan, (5.0mg/ml)>240
    Mitomycin C, (0.5mg/ml)>240
    Mitoxantrone, (2.0mg/ml)>240
    Oxaliplatin, (2.0mg/ml)>240
    Paraplatin, (10.0mg/ml)>240
    Retrovir, (10.0mg/ml)>240
    Rituximab, (10.0mg/ml)>240
    Topotecan HCL, (1.0mg/ml)>240
    Trisonex, (1.0mg/ml)>240
    Velcade (Bortezomib), (1.0mg/ml)>240
    Vincristine, (1.0mg/ml)>240

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

    The document does not specify the exact sample sizes (number of gloves or test replicates) used for each individual test (e.g., tensile strength, freedom from holes, chemotherapy permeation). It references the ASTM standards, which typically define the appropriate sample sizes and testing methodologies.

    The data provenance is from non-clinical testing conducted by Better Care Plastic Technology Co., Ltd. located in Hebei Province, China. The data is prospective in the sense that these tests were conducted specifically to support this 510(k) submission.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

    This information is not applicable as the evaluation of these medical gloves relies on objective measurements performed according to recognized international standards (ASTM, ISO). There is no "ground truth" derived from expert consensus on medical images or clinical outcomes for this type of device. The "truth" is established by the standardized test methods themselves and the resulting physical and chemical measurements.

    4. Adjudication method for the test set

    This information is not applicable. The tests performed are objective, quantitative measurements according to predefined standards. There is no subjective assessment requiring adjudication.

    5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    This information is not applicable. This is a medical glove, a physical device, and not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive technology for human readers.

    6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    This information is not applicable. As mentioned above, this is a physical medical device, not an algorithm or AI system.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

    The "ground truth" for the performance of these gloves is based on objective measurements derived from standardized test methods (ASTM D6319-10, ASTM D6978-05, ISO 10993 series). For example:

    • Physical properties (e.g., tensile strength, elongation): Measured directly by testing equipment following ASTM protocols.
    • Freedom from holes: Determined by a standardized water-leak test (ASTM D5151-06).
    • Chemotherapy drug permeation: Measured by detecting the breakthrough of chemotherapy drugs through the glove material over time, as per ASTM D6978-05.
    • Biocompatibility: Evaluated using established in-vitro and in-vivo biological tests (cytotoxicity, irritation, sensitization) according to ISO 10993 standards.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    This information is not applicable. There is no "training set" in the context of validating a medical glove. The product is manufactured and then tested to ensure it meets performance standards.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    This information is not applicable for the reasons stated in point 8.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1