Search Results

NIOX VERO® measures Nitric Oxide (NO) in human breath. Nitric Oxide is frequently increased in some inflammatory processes such as asthma. The fractional NO concentration in expired breath (FeNO), can be measured by NIOX VERO according to guidelines for NO measurement established by the American Thoracic Society.

Measurement of FeNO by NIOX VERO is a quantitative, non-invasive, simple and safe method to measure the decrease in FeNO concentration in asthma patients that often occurs after treatment with anti-inflammatory pharmacological therapy, as an indication of the therapeutic effect in patients with elevated FeNO levels. NIOX VERO is suitable for children, approximately 7 - 17 years, and adults 18 years and older.

FeNO measurements provide the physician with means of evaluating an asthma patient's response to anti-inflammatory therapy, as an adjunct to the established clinical and laboratory assessments in asthma. The NIOX VERO is intended for prescription use and should only be used as directed in the NIOX VERO User Manual by trained healthcare professionals. NIOX VERO cannot be used with infants or by children approximately under the age of 7, as measurement requires patient cooperation. NIOX VERO should not be used in critical care, emergency care or in anesthesiology.

NIOX VERO is a portable system for the non-invasive, quantitative measurement of the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) in expired human breath (FeNO). NO levels increase during allergic airway inflammation. Measurement of changes in FeNO concentration is used in evaluating a patient's response to antiinflammatory therapy, as an adjunct to established clinical and laboratory assessments.

The NIOX VERO system is comprised of the NIOX VERO unit with AC adapter, a rechargeable battery, an electrochemical NO sensor, disposable patient filters, and an exchangeable handle containing an internal NO scrubber filter. The NIOX Panel is an optional PC application for operation of the NIOX VERO from a PC and access to electronic medical record systems. The device can connect to the PC via a standard USB cable or wirelessly via Bluetooth.

The patient empties their lungs, inhales deeply through the patient filter to total lung capacity and then slowly exhale for 10 seconds. In approximately one minute, the NO concentration is displayed in parts per billion (ppb).

The NIOX VERO unit includes a sampling and gas conditioning system and a man-machine interface (MMI). The instrument controls the inhaled sample appropriately via the electronics and software program. Filtering of inhaled air elimination from ambient NO levels. A built-in flow control keeps exhalation standardized at 50 ml/s so that it is standardized for all patients. The sample enters an electromechanical sensor and interacts with an electrolyte. A chemical reaction takes place where electrons are generated proportional to the number of NO molecules.

Results are processed using dedicated software. In order to verify the device's performance and reliability of measurements, there are built-in system control procedures and a Quality Control procedure to be performed on a daily basis.

The provided text describes a Special 510(k) summary for the NIOX® VERO Airway Inflammation Monitor (K150233). This submission is specifically for the activation of existing Bluetooth technology on the predicate device (K133898). Therefore, the performance testing focuses on wireless functionality and its impact, not on the core diagnostic capabilities of measuring FeNO. The document states that the core performance characteristics (analytical limits, precision, accuracy, measurement range, linearity) are identical to the predicate device.

Here's an analysis based on the provided text, addressing your points:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

Since this 510(k) is for activating Bluetooth, the acceptance criteria and performance for the core function (FeNO measurement) are referenced as being identical to the predicate device (K133898). The key performance criteria for the Bluetooth activation itself relate to wireless coexistence and safety.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

The document does not specify a separate "test set" sample size for the Bluetooth activation. It refers to
"Verification and validation testing was previously performed for Bluetooth functionality prior to FDA clearance."
and "FCC Part 15B testing was repeated with the Bluetooth module active in the NIOX VERO."

The data provenance for the wireless testing is implied to be from the manufacturer's internal testing, conducted previously and then repeated for the US market activation. The country of origin for the internal testing is not explicitly stated, but the manufacturer is based in Sweden. Given the nature of Bluetooth standards and FCC regulations, such testing generally follows international or country-specific standards.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

Not applicable for this type of submission. The testing described for Bluetooth activation does not involve expert-established ground truth in the way a clinical diagnostic study would. The ground truth for electrical and wireless performance is defined by industry standards and regulatory requirements (e.g., FCC regulations).

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

Not applicable for this type of submission. Adjudication methods are typically used in studies where clinical interpretations or diagnoses are being evaluated by multiple experts.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

Not applicable. This device is a diagnostic tool for measuring FeNO, and the submission concerns the activation of wireless connectivity. It is not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool involving human reader interpretation.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

The device's core function (FeNO measurement) is standalone in the sense that it provides a quantitative measurement. The submission for Bluetooth activation itself is a re-validation of wireless functionality, which is a standalone technical performance. The text states:

"Verification and validation were previously performed to demonstrate that the USB cable communications functions are equivalent to the Bluetooth wireless communication operation."

This indicates that equivalence between wired and wireless communication, both standalone technical functions, was established.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert concensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

For the core FeNO measurement specified as "identical to predicate," the ground truth for analytical performance (accuracy, precision, linearity) typically relies on reference methods or calibrated gas standards. This document doesn't detail how the predicate's ground truth was established, but it would not be based on expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data.

For the Bluetooth activation, the "ground truth" for wireless coexistence and safety is compliance with regulatory standards and guidelines (e.g., FCC Part 15B, FDA Radio Frequency Wireless Technology in Medical Devices guidance).

8. The sample size for the training set

Not applicable for this type of device and submission. This is not a machine learning or AI-based device that would require training sets.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

Not applicable, as no training set is described or relevant for this submission.

Ask a specific question about this device