Search Results

The Bipore AccuFlex ™ Percutaneous Sheath Introducer is recommended for The Dipore Acour Ion and therapeutic procedures.
The Bipore AccuFlex ™ Percutaneous Sheath Introducer is indications for 500: The Diperty of various devices into arteries and/or veins for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

Bipore Accuflex™ Percutaneous Sheath Introducer

The provided text is related to a 510(k) submission for a medical device modification, specifically the "Bipore Accuflex™ Percutaneous Sheath Introducer." This type of submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than proving efficacy or performance against extensive clinical criteria. As such, the document does not contain the information requested in your prompt regarding acceptance criteria, study details, human reader performance, or ground truth establishment.

Here's why the requested information is absent and what can be inferred from the document:

• Type of Device and Submission: The device is a "Percutaneous Sheath Introducer," which is a relatively standard medical tool. The submission is an "Abbreviated 510(k) Device modification," indicating that it's for changes to an already cleared device (K964814, the predicate). This regulatory pathway is less stringent than a PMA (Premarket Approval) and typically doesn't require new, comprehensive clinical studies to establish acceptance criteria or performance metrics in the way a novel AI diagnostic or therapeutic device would.

• Focus on Substantial Equivalence: The core of a 510(k) is to demonstrate that the new device is "substantially equivalent" to a legally marketed predicate device. This usually involves comparing design, materials, intended use, and performance characteristics to show they are similar enough that the new device raises no new questions of safety or effectiveness.

• Lack of Performance Study Details: The document mentions "Indications for Use" but does not define specific performance metrics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision) or provide details of studies designed to measure these metrics against a predetermined acceptance criterion. There's no mention of a test set, ground truth, expert opinions, or human reader studies.

Therefore, I cannot populate the table or answer the specific questions based on the provided text. The document is a regulatory communication for a device modification, not a performance study report.

In summary, the provided document does not contain the information required to answer your prompt.

Ask a specific question about this device