Search Results

The Zavation ZV plasty (system) is intended to be used for the reduction of fractures and/or creation of a void in cancellous bone in the spine. This includes use during percutaneous vertebral augmentation. The system is to be used with cleared spinal Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cements indicated for use during percutaneous vertebral augmentation procedures, such as kyphoplasty.

The Zavation ZVplasty system is designed for use in vertebroplasty procedures for treatment of vertebral compression fractures in the lumbar or thoracic regions brought on by primary or secondary osteoporosis, cancer or trauma. The Zavation ZVplasty system consist of a variety of manual instruments which provide physicians with a means to access the vertebral body with a mechanical device in order to prepare a site for vertebroplasty. Once the site is prepared the Zavation ZVplasty system instruments are used to percutaneously deliver polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement to the spine. The Zavation ZVplasty system instruments are to be used with the following previously FDA cleared items, balloon catheter, inflation syringe, vacuum syringe, stopcock, PMMA bone cement, cement mixing system.

The provided document is a 510(k) premarket notification letter and summary for the ZVplasty system. It explicitly states:

"No clinical tests were submitted, referenced, or relied on in the premarket notification submission for a determination of substantial equivalence because the technological performance characteristics of the subject system are the same as the predicates device."

Therefore, the document does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria. Instead, the submission relies on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices through technological characteristic comparison and non-clinical data related to materials, luer lock connections, and sterilization.

Since there are no clinical trials or performance studies reported, I cannot provide the requested information for:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
4. Adjudication method for the test set
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done
6. If a standalone performance (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
7. The type of ground truth used
8. The sample size for the training set
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

Ask a specific question about this device