Search Results

The Gambro WRO 300 Water Purification System is intended to be used as a dialysis accessory device in conjunction with one dialysis machine to produce water used to prepare and dilute dialysis concentrate to form dialysis fluid by using the reverse osmosis concept.

The Gambro WRO 300 water purification unit is designed to be used as a dialysis accessory device to produce water used to prepare and dilute dialysis concentrate to form dialysis fluid by using the reverse osmosis concept. It is intended for use in conjunction with one dialysis machine, provided that the input flow and pressure demands correspond to the output of the WRO 300 unit.

Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the Gambro WRO 300 Water Purification System, focusing on the requested acceptance criteria and study details.

Based solely on the provided 510(k) summary, the device is a water purification system for hemodialysis, not an AI/ML powered device. Therefore, many of the requested fields related to AI/ML device performance (like MRMC studies, standalone algorithm performance, number of experts for ground truth, sample sizes for test/training sets, adjudication methods, and effect sizes) are not applicable to this document.

The acceptance criteria for such a device are primarily focused on meeting specific water quality standards for hemodialysis, and the "study" is typically a non-clinical verification or validation demonstrating that the system produces water meeting those standards.

Here's the information extracted and interpreted based on the context of a medical device submission for a water purification system:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Note: The provided 510(k) summary is a high-level overview. Detailed performance specifications, such as specific particulate counts, conductivity, ion levels, or bacterial limits, which would constitute the explicit "acceptance criteria" for purified water, are typically found in the full design verification and validation reports, and accompanying standards (e.g., AAMI standards for water for hemodialysis), which are not part of this summary document. The "reported device performance" here is limited to the statements made in the summary.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

• Sample Size for Test Set: Not applicable in the context of an AI/ML device. For this hardware device, the "test set" would refer to the number of units tested or the number of batches of water processed. This is not specified in the summary.
• Data Provenance (e.g., country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective): Not applicable for this type of device and submission summary. The testing mentioned ("Testing verified that the reverse osmosis method...") would have been internal engineering and quality testing, likely conducted at the manufacturer's facilities.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

• Not Applicable. This is a hardware device. "Ground truth" in the AI/ML sense (e.g., expert annotation of images) is not relevant. The "ground truth" for a water purification system is objectively measurable chemical and biological properties of the water, verified by laboratory analysis, often against established standards.

4. Adjudication Method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the Test Set

• Not Applicable. This concept is for resolving discrepancies in expert labeling or decision-making for AI/ML validation. For a hardware device, "adjudication" would refer to how test results are accepted or rejected, typically against specified engineering tolerances or regulatory standards, handled by quality control/assurance personnel.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs. without AI assistance

• Not Applicable. This device is a water purification system, not an AI/ML diagnostic aid. Human readers, cases, or AI assistance are not relevant to its function.

6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

• Not Applicable. This device is a hardware system, not an algorithm.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

• Objective Measurements/Standards Compliance: The "ground truth" for this device would be established through objective analytical measurements of the purified water's chemical, physical, and microbiological properties, compared against established regulatory standards for water used in hemodialysis (e.g., AAMI standards, or other national/international standards). For example, conductivity measurements, specific ion concentrations, endotoxin levels, and bacterial counts.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

• Not Applicable. This is a hardware device; it does not have a "training set" in the context of machine learning.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established

• Not Applicable. No training set exists for this hardware device.

Ask a specific question about this device