Search Results

The Vela RX PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter is intended for use in percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of the femoral, popliteal, infra popliteal and renal arteries.

The Vela RX PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter has a 0.014" (0.36mm) rapid exchange co-axial design, which consists of proximal tube with hub and strain relief, transition tube, and distal tube with a balloon at the distal tip. The balloon is made of a Pebax low-compliant material and will expand to a known diameter and length at 6 atmospheres pressure. Two radiopaque markers under the balloon aid in positioning the balloon working length under the fluoroscopy. The nominal inflated balloon diameters range from 1.5mm to 4.0mm with balloon working lengths of 10mm to 40mm. The effective catheter length is 140cm, and is provided with a hydrophilic coating on the distal catheter shaft. The maximum compatible guide wire to be used with the Vela RX PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter is 0.014" (0.36mm), and the compatible introducer sheath size is 4F.

The provided text is a 510(k) Summary for the Vela RX PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter. It outlines the device's characteristics, intended use, and comparison to predicate devices to demonstrate substantial equivalence for FDA clearance.

Crucially, this document does NOT describe the acceptance criteria or a study that proves a device (like an AI algorithm) meets acceptance criteria in the context of human-AI collaboration or standalone AI diagnostic performance. Instead, it discusses the acceptance criteria and testing for a physical medical device (a balloon dilatation catheter) qua physical medical device, not an AI or software as a medical device.

Therefore, I cannot extract the information required by your prompt, as the provided text does not contain details about:

• AI algorithm performance
• Test set sample size for AI
• Data provenance for AI
• Experts establishing ground truth for AI
• Adjudication methods for AI ground truth
• MRMC comparative effectiveness study for AI
• Standalone AI performance
• Type of ground truth (e.g., pathology, outcomes data) in an AI context
• Training set sample size for AI
• How ground truth for the training set was established for AI

The document focuses on engineering performance tests for a physical catheter (e.g., burst pressure, flexibility, biocompatibility) and comparisons to existing predicate catheters.

If you have a document describing an AI medical device or software, please provide that, and I would be happy to analyze it against your criteria.

Ask a specific question about this device