Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K040730
    Date Cleared
    2004-06-18

    (88 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    870.4450
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    VASCULAR SOLUTIONS D-STAT CLAMP HEMOSTATIC CLAMP

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The D-Stat Clamp Accessory is indicated for use with the Compressar Universal System (Advanced Vascular Dynamics) and the Femoral Artery Vascular Clamp (Pressure Products) compression devices or as a standalone device to assist in the control of bleeding following catheterization or cannulation procedures.

    Device Description

    The D-Stat Clamp Accessory consists of a lyophilized pad containing thrombin, sodium carboxymethylcellulose and calcium chloride secured to a compressible foam pad and plastic base. The device is designed for attachment to several commercially available femoral access compression devices or as a standalone device.

    D-Stat Clamp achieves its principal intended action (hemostasis) by creating a physical barrier to blood flow and facilitating wound compression. The thrombin contained in the lyophilized pad further facilitates hemostasis through enzymatic cleavage and conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the acceptance criteria and study for the D-Stat Clamp™ Accessory:

    This device (D-Stat Clamp™ Accessory) did not undergo a clinical study or performance testing as part of this 510(k) submission. Therefore, it does not have specific acceptance criteria for device performance based on a study, nor does it present data to prove it meets such criteria.

    The submission states:

    • "Summary of Non-Clinical Testing: No additional non-clinical testing of this product for this use was conducted as it represents a slight modification of an existing product."
    • "Summary of Clinical Testing: No clinical evaluations of this product for this use have been conducted."

    The 510(k) clearance was based on its substantial equivalence to predicate devices, not on a new clinical study demonstrating performance against specific acceptance criteria.

    Given this, I cannot fill in the requested table and information about a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria, as that study was not performed.

    However, I can extract the general information requested, highlighting the absence of performance studies:

    **No performance studies, clinical or non-clinical, were conducted for the D-Stat Clamp™ Accessory, according to this 510(k) submission ([K040730](https://510k.innolitics.com/search/K040730)).**
    Therefore, there are no specific acceptance criteria defined or reported device performance data from a study for this device shown in the provided text. The regulatory clearance was based on substantial equivalence to predicate devices.
    

    Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

    Acceptance Criteria (e.g., % success rate, time to hemostasis, etc.)Reported Device Performance (from a study)
    No specific acceptance criteria defined in this submissionNo performance data from a study was reported in this submission.

    Detailed Study Information (Based on the provided text, indicating absence of a study):

    1. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable. No test set was used for a performance study.
    2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. No ground truth was established for a test set as no performance study was conducted.
    3. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable. No test set or adjudication.
    4. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This is not an AI device, and no MRMC study was performed.
    5. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done: Not applicable. This is a medical device, not an algorithm, and no standalone performance study was done.
    6. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc): Not applicable. No ground truth was established as no performance study was conducted.
    7. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. This is a medical device, not a machine learning model, and no training set was used.
    8. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable. No training set was used.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1