Search Results

The V.A.C.Ulta Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System is an integrated wound management system that provides Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with an instillation option.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in the absence of instillation is intended to create an environment that promotes wound healing by secondary or tertiary (delayed primary) intention by preparing the wound bed for closure, reducing edema, promoting granulation tissue formation and perfusion, and by removing exudate and infectious material.

The instillation option is indicated for patients who would benefit from vacuum assisted drainage and controlled delivery of topical wound treatment solutions and suspensions over the wound bed.

The V.A.C.Ulta Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System with and without instillation is indicated for patients with chronic, acute, traumatic, sub-acute and dehisced wounds, partial-thickness burns, ulcers (such as diabetic, pressure and venous insufficiency), flaps and grafts.

A dressing component of a negative pressure wound therapy system with an instillation feature which allows controlled delivery and drainage of topical wound treatment solutions and suspensions

The V.A.C. VeraFlo Cleanse Dressing System is a dressing component of a negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) system with an instillation feature. The device allows for controlled delivery and drainage of topical wound treatment solutions and suspensions.

Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets those criteria:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The provided document does not explicitly state numerical acceptance criteria or specific performance metrics with target values. Instead, it describes various tests conducted to assure "conformance to design specifications" and concludes that the device "was shown to meet all performance requirements."

However, we can infer the general performance aspects evaluated:

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

• Sample Size: The document does not specify the exact sample sizes for each test. For the "acute swine model," it implies at least one swine was used, but the specific number is not provided. Bench tests typically involve multiple units or repetitions but the number is not stated.
• Data Provenance: The studies are described as "design verification and validation tests." They appear to be prospective studies conducted by the manufacturer (KCI, Inc.) for regulatory submission. The country of origin of the data is not explicitly stated, but given the manufacturer's address in San Antonio, Texas, USA, and the FDA submission, it is highly likely the studies were conducted in the USA.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

This information is not provided in the document. The studies listed are primarily technical performance tests and an animal model study, which typically do not involve human expert consensus for "ground truth" in the same way clinical diagnostic AI studies might. For the swine model, the assessment of "granulation tissue formation and wound fill response" would be made by veterinary or medical researchers with expertise in wound healing, but their specific number or qualifications are not detailed. Biocompatibility testing follows established ISO standards, where the "ground truth" is defined by the test itself.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

This information is not applicable/not provided as the studies are engineering/animal performance tests rather than clinical studies requiring adjudication of human readings or diagnoses.

5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, If so, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs without AI assistance

No, a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done. This device is a medical device (dressing system), not a diagnostic AI or imaging interpretation algorithm designed to assist human readers. Therefore, the concept of "human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance" does not apply here.

6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

This question is not directly applicable to the device. The V.A.C. VeraFlo Cleanse Dressing System is a physical dressing component of a Negative Pressure Wound Therapy system, not an algorithm. The software mentioned provides "controls for both negative pressure wound therapy and delivery of instillation therapy" and "controls for help and alarm functions," but it's an embedded control system, not a standalone diagnostic or interpretative algorithm. The performance evaluation focuses on the physical and biological interaction of the dressing system with the wound, not on standalone algorithm performance.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

The ground truth for the various tests can be described as follows:

• Functional Performance (Pressure, Fluid Distribution, Mechanical Properties): The ground truth is defined by engineering specifications and established physical principles. For example, pressure distribution would be compared against a desired range, and mechanical properties against industry standards (ASTM).
• Granulation Tissue Formation and Wound Fill Response: The ground truth is established through histological analysis, gross observation, and quantitative measurements in the animal model, interpreted by domain experts (e.g., veterinary pathologists, wound care researchers). This is akin to pathology findings and observational outcomes data in a controlled model.
• Biocompatibility: The ground truth is defined by international standards (ISO 10993-1), where passing specific cytotoxicity, irritation, and sensitization tests according to the defined protocols constitutes meeting the ground truth for biocompatibility.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

This information is not applicable/not provided. The V.A.C. VeraFlo Cleanse Dressing System is a physical medical device. It does not utilize machine learning or AI algorithms in a way that requires a "training set" for model development. The software mentioned provides control functions, which are typically developed through traditional software engineering and testing, not AI model training.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

This information is not applicable/not provided as there is no "training set" for this type of medical device.

Ask a specific question about this device