Search Results

The Stryker Spine Aero™ -AL is an intervertebral body fusion device indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft when the subject device is used as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1.

DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have six months of nonoperative therapy.

The Aero™ - AL Lumbar Cage System is to be implanted via an anterior approach.

The Aero™ - AL Lumbar Cage System is intended to be used with supplemental spinal fixation systems that has been cleared for use in the lumbosacral spine (e.g., posterior pedicle screw and rod systems) in addition to the included fixation anchors.

The Stryker Spine AERO®-C Cervical Cage is indicated for use in cervical interbody fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level from the C2-C3 disc to the C7-Tl disc.

DDD is defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have six weeks of non-operative therapy.

The AERO®-C Cervical Cage System is to be used with autogenous bone graft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft, and is to be implanted via an open, anterior approach.

The AERO®-C Cervical Cage System is intended to be used with supplemental spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the cervical spine. In addition, the device must be used with the included fixation anchors.

The Stryker Spine Aero™ - LL is an intervertebral body fusion device indicated for use with autogenous bone graft in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1.

DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have six months of nonoperative therapy.

The Aero™ -LL Lumbar Cage System is to be implanted via a lateral approach.

The Aero™ -LL Lumbar Cage System is intended to be used with supplemental spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the lumbosacral spine (e.g., posterior pedicle screw and rod systems). In addition, the device may be used with or without the included fixation anchors.

When used as a cervical intervertebral body fusion device, the Aleutian implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature patients. Cervical IBF implants are intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C2 to Tl, for the treatment of cervical disc disease (defined as neck pain of disco genie origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies). The cervical device is intended to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment.

When used as a lumbar intervertebral body fusion device, the Aleutian implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature patients. The lumbar IBF implants are intended for use at either one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine, from L2 to S 1, for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DOD) with up to Grade I spondylolisthesis. ODD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The lumbar device is intended to be used in patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment.

When used as vertebral body replacement devices the Aleutian implants are indicated for use in the thoracolumbar spine (TI to LS) for partial replacement (i.e., partial vertebrectomy) of a diseased vertebral body, resected or excised for the treatment of tumors or trauma/fracture in order to achieve anterior decompression of the spinal tissues, and to restore the height of a collapsed vertebral body. The Aleutian implants are designed to restore the biomechanical integrity of the anterior, middle, and posterior spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a prolonged period.

For all the above indications the Aleutian implants are intended to be used with supplemental internal fixation appropriate for the implanted level. including K2M Pedicle Screw and Hook Systems, and K2M Spinal Plate Systems.

The Ascential IBD PEEK. Spacers are indicated for use in cervical interbody fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level from the C2-C3 disc to the C7-T1 disc. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The Ascential IBD PEEKc Spacers are to be used with autogenous bone and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft, and are to be implanted via an open, anterior approach.

The Ascential IBD PEEKc Spacer is intended to be used with supplemental fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the cervical spine. This cervical device is to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment.

The Stryker Spine AVS® AL and AVS® ALign PEEK Spacers are intervertebral body fusion devices indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous bone graft when the subject device is used an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) and one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1.

DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have six months of nonoperative therapy.

Additionally, the AVS® AL and AVS® ALign PEEK Spacers can be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis.

The AVS® AL and AVS® ALign PEEK Spacers are to be implanted via anterior or anterolateral approach.

The AVS® AL and AVS® ALign PEEK Spacers are intended to be used with supplemental fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the lumbosacral spine.

The Stryker Spine AVS® Anchor-C Cervical Cage System is indicated for anterior cervical interbody fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with cervical disc disease at one level from the C7-T1 disc. Cervical disc disease is defined as intractable radiculopathy with herniated disc and/or osteophyte formation on posterior vertebral endplates producing symptomatic nerve root and/or spinal cord compression confirmed by radiographic studies. The AVS® Anchor-C Cervical Cage is to be used with autogenous bone graft and implanted via an open, anterior approach.

The AVS® Anchor-C Cervical Cage must be used with the internal screw fixation provided by AVS® Anchor-C Fixation Screws. This cervical device is to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment.

The Stryker Spine AVS® Anchor-L is an intervertebral body fusion device indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft when the subject device is used as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1.

DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have six months of nonoperative therapy.

The AVS® Anchor-L Lumbar Cage system is to be implanted via an open, anterior approach.

The AVS® Anchor-L Lumbar Cage system may be used as a stand-alone device or in conjunction with supplemental fixation. When used as a stand-alone device, the AVS® Anchor-L Lumbar Cage must be used with the internal screw and plate fixation provided by the AVS® Anchor-L Fixation Screws and Locking Plate. If AVS® Anchor-L is used with less than three or none of the provided screws, then additional supplemental fixation that has been cleared by the FDA for use in the lumbar spine must be used to augment stability. The accompanying Locking Plate must be vice is used with any number of screws.

The Stryker Spine AVS® ARIA PEEK Spacers are intervertebral body fusion devices indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous bone graft when the subject device is used as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1.

DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have six months of nonoperative therapy.

Additionally, the AVS® ARIA PEEK Spacers can be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis.

The AVS® ARIA PEEK Spacers are intended to be used with supplemental fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the lumbosacral spine.

The Stryker Spine AVS® AS PEEK Spacers are indicated for use in cervical interbody fusion procedures in sketally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level from the C2-C3 disc to the C7-T1 disc. DDD is defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The AVS® AS PEEK Spacers are to be used with autogenous bone graft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft, and are to be implanted via an open, anterior approach.

The AVS® AS PEEK Spacers are intended to be used with supplemental fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the cervical spine. This cervical device is to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment.

The Stryker Spine AVS® Navigator PEEK Spacers are intervertebral body fusion devices indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous bone graft when the subject device is used as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1.

DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have six months of nonoperative therapy.

Additionally, the AVS® Navigator PEEK Spacers can be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis.

The AVS® Navigator PEEK Spacers are to be implanted via a posterolateral approach.

The AVS® Navigator PEEK Spacers are intended to be used with supplemental fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the lumbosacral spine.

The Stryker Spine AVS® PL and AVS® UniLIF™ PEEK Spacers are intervertebral body fusion devices indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous bone graft when the subject device is used as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1.

DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have six months of nonoperative therapy.

Additionally, the AVS® PL and AVS® UniLIFIM PEEK Spacers can be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis.

The AVS® PL PEEK Spacers and AVS® UniLIF™ PEEK Spacers are to be implanted via posterior approach.

The AVS® PL PEEK Spacers and AVS® UniLIF™ PEEK Spacers are intended to be used with supplemental spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the lumbosacral spine (i.e., posterior pedicle screw and rod systems).

The Stryker Spine AVS® TL PEEK Spacers are intervertebral body fusion devices indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft when the subject device is used an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) and one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1.

DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have six months of nonoperative therapy.

Additionally, the AVS® TL PEEK Spacers can be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis.

The AVS® TL PEEK Spacers are to be implanted via posterior approach.

The AVS® TL PEEK Spacers are intended to be used with supplemental fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the lumbosacral spine (i.e., posterior pedicle screw and rod systems).

The Stryker Spine AVS® PL and AVS® UniLIF™ PEEK Spacers are intervertebral body fusion devices indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous bone graft when the subject device is used as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1.

DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have six months of nonoperative therapy.

Additionally, the AVS® PL and AVS® UniLIFIM PEEK Spacers can be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis.

The AVS® PL PEEK Spacers and AVS® UniLIF™ PEEK Spacers are to be implanted via posterior approach.

The AVS® PL PEEK Spacers and AVS® UniLIF™ PEEK Spacers are intended to be used with supplemental spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the lumbosacral spine (i.e., posterior pedicle screw and rod systems).

CAPRI Corpectomy Cages are vertebral body replacement devices intended for use in the cervical and thoracolumbar spine.

When used in the cervical spine (C2-T1), CAPRI Static and Expandable cages are intended for use in skeletally mature patients to replace a diseased or damaged vertebral body caused by tumor, fracture, or osteomyelitis, or for reconstruction following corpectomy performed to achieve decompression of the spinal tissues in cervical degenerative disorders. These cages are intended to restore integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the cervical spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion, with bone graft used at the surgeon's discretion.

When used in the thoracolumbar spine (T1-L5), CAPRI Static and Expandable cages are intended for use to replace a collapsed, damaged, or unstable vertebral body due to tumor and trauma (i.e. fracture). These are designed to provide anterior spinal column support even in the absence of fusion for a prolonged period.

The interior of the cages can be packed with autograft or allogenic bone graft comprising cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft as an adjunct to fusion.

When used in the thoracolumbar spine, the CAPRI Static and Expandable Corpectorny cages are intended to be used with supplemental internal fixation appropriate for the implanted level, including K2M Pedicle Screw and K2M Spinal Plate Systems.

When used in the cervical spine at one or two levels, the CAPRI Static and Expandable cages with supplemental fixation cleared by the FDA for use in the cervical spine. When used at more than two levels, supplemental fixation should include posterior fixation which is cleared by the FDA.

The CASCADIA lumbar implants are intervertebral body fusion devices indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft when used as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be sketally mature and have six months of nonoperative therapy. Additionally, the CASCADIA lumbar implants can be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis. CASCADIA lumbar implants are intended to be used with supplemental spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the lumbosacral spine.

The CASCADIA hyperlordotic lateral lumbar implants (≥22°), are intended for levels L2-L5 and are to be used with CAYMAN United plates in addition to posterior supplemental fixation. The CASCADIA non-hyperlordotic lateral lumbar implants may optionally be used with CAYMAN United plates, in addition to supplemental spinal fixation systems.

The CASCADIA cervical implants are intervertebral body fusion devices indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft when used as an adjunct to fusion in patients with cervical disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from C2 to T1. These patients should be sketally mature and have had six weeks of non-operative treatment. The CASCADIA cervical implants are also to be used with supplemental fixation; the hyperlordotic CASCADIA cervical implants (i.e., ≥10°) are required to be used with an atterior cervical plate as the form of supplemental fixation.

When used as a cervical intervertebral body fusion device, the CHESAPEAKE Stabilization System implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature patients. Cervical IBF implants are intended for use at one level in the cervical spine, from C2 to T1, for the treatment of cervical disc disease (defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radies). The cervical device is intended to be used in patients who have had six weeks of non-operative treatment.

When used as a lumbar intervertebral body fusion device, the CHESAPEAKE Stabilization System implants are indicated for spinal fusion procedures to be used with autogenous bone graft in skeletally mature patients. The Lumbar IBF implants are intended for use at either one level or two contiguous levels in the lumbar spine, from L2 to S1, for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The lumbar device is intended to be used in patients who have had six months of non-operative treatment.

The hyperlordotic lumbar implants (i.e., > 15°) must be used with supplemental fixation (i.e., posterior pedicle screw and rod system) cleared for use in the lumbar spine, in addition to the bone screws provided. Otherwise, the Chesapeake Stabilization System implants (i.e., ≤15°) may be used as a stand-alone device, which is intended to be used with the bone screws provided (i.e., 2 or 3 screws for the 2-screw and 3-screw implants, respectively).

The MOJAVE Expandable Interbody System implants are intervertebral body fusion devices indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous bone graft when used as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DOD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radios. The DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have six months of nonoperative therapy. Additionally, the MOJAVE lumbar implants can be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis. MOJAVE lumbar implants are intended to be used with supplemental spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the lumbosacral spine.

The Stryker Spine Monterey™ AL Interbody System - Stand-Alone) is an interbody fusion device indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft when used as an adjunct to fusion in patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1.

DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have six months of non-operative therapy.

Additionally, the Monterey™ AL Stand-Alone System can be used as adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis.

The Monterey™ AL Stand-Alone System is intended to be implanted via an anterior approach.

The Monterey™ AL Stand-Alone System may be used as a stand-alone device or in conjunction with supplemental fixation. When used as a stand-alone device, the Monterey™ AL Stand-Alone System must be used with the bone screws provided and requires no additional supplemental fixation. If Monterey™ AL Stand-Alone System is used with less than three or none of the provided bone screws, then additional supplemental fixation that has been cleared by the FDA for use in the lumbosacral spine must be used to augment stability. Hyperlordotic implants (>20° lordosis) are intended to be used with supplemental fixation (e.g., posterior fixation),

The Stryker Spine Monterey™ AL Interbody System – Spacer) is an intervertebral body fusion device indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft when used as an adjunct to fusion in patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) at one or two contiguous levels from L2-S1.

DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have six months of non-operative therapy.

Additionally, the Monterey™ AL Spacer System can be used as adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis.

The Monterey™ AL Spacer System is intended to be implanted via an anterior approach.

The Monterey™ AL Spacer System is intended to be used with supplemental fixation systems that have been cleared by the FDA for use in the lumbosacral spine.

The SAHARA Stabilization System implants are intervertebral body fusion devices indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft when used as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The DDD patients may also have up to Grade 1 spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have six months of nonoperative therapy. Additionally, the SAHARA implants can be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis.

Hyperlordotic (angles > 15°) and Lateral implants must be used with supplemental fixation (i.e., posterior pedicle screw and rod system) cleared for use in the lumbar spine, in addition to the bone screws provided. Additional supplemental fixation (i.e. pedicle screw and rod system) is needed when used as an adjunct to fusion for degenerative scoliosis. Otherwise, the SAHARA Stabilization System implants may be used as a stand-alone device, which is intended to be used with the bone screws provided.

SANTORINI Corpectomy Cages are vertebral body replacement devices intended for use in the cervical and thoracolumbar spine.

When used in the cervical spine (C2-T1), SANTORINI cages are intended for use in skeletally mature patients to replace a diseased or damaged vertebral body caused by tumor, fracture, or osteomyelitis, or for reconstruction following corpectorny performed to achieve decompression of the spinal cord and neural tissues in cervical degenerative disorders. These cages are intended to restore integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the cervical spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion, with bone graft used at the surgeon's discretion.

When used in the thoracolumbar spine (TI-L5), SANTORINI cages are intended for use to replace a collapsed, damaged, or unstable vertebral body due to tumor and trauma (i.e. fracture). These cages are designed to provide anterior spinal column support even in the absence of fusion for a prolonged period.

The interior of the cages can be packed with autograft or allogenic bone graft comprising cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft as an adjunct to fusion.

When used in the thoracolumbar spine, the Santorini Corpectomy cages are intended to be used with supplemental internal fixation appropriate for the implanted level. including K2M Pedicle Screw and K2M Spinal Plate Systems.

When used in the cervical spine at one or two levels, the SANTORINI Corpectomy Cage System is intended to be used with supplemental fixation cleared by the FDA for use in the cervical spine. When used at more than two levels, supplemental fixation should include posterior fixation which is cleared by the FDA.

The Tritanium® C Anterior Cervical Cage is indicated for use in cervical interbody fusion procedures in skeletally mature patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from the C2 to T1 disc.

DDD is defined as neck pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These patients should be skeletally mature and have six weeks of non-operative therapy.

The Trianium® C Anterior Cervical Cage System is to be used with autogenous bone graft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft, and is to be implanted via an open, anterior approach.

The Tritanium® C Anterior Cervical Cage System is intended to be used with supplemental spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the cervical spine.

The Stryker Spine Tritanium® PL Cage is an intervertebral body fusion device indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft when used as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1.

DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The DDD pairents may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have six months of nonoperative therapy.

Additionally, the Tritanium® PL Cage can be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis.

The Tritanium® PL Cage is to be implanted via a posterior approach.

The Tritanium® PL Cage is intended to be used with supplemental spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the lumbosacral spine.

The Stryker Spine Tritanium® TL cage is an intervertebral body fusion device indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft when used as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1.

DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have six months of nonoperative therapy.

Additionally, the Tritanium TL Cage can be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis.

The Tritanium TL Cage is to be implanted via a posterior approach.

The Tritanium TL Cage is intended to be used with supplemental spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the lumbosacral spine.

The Tritanium® X PL Expandable Posterior Lumbar Cage and Tritanium® X TL Expandable Curved Posterior Lumbar Cage are intended for intervertebral body fusion with autografic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft when the subject device is used as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1. DDD is defined as back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have completed six months of non-operative treatment.

Additionally, the Tritanium® X PL Expandable Posterior Lumbar Cage and Tritanium® X TL Expandable Curved Posterior Lumbar Cage can be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis.

The Tritanium® X PL Expandable Posterior Lumbar Cage and Tritanium® X TL Expandable Curved Posterior Lumbar Cage are always to be used with supplemental internal spinal fixation. Additionally, the Tritanium® X PL Expandable Posterior Lumbar Cage and Trianium® X TL Expandable Curved Posterior Lumbar Cage are to be used with autograff and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous bone graft when the subject device is used as an adjunct to fusion.

The Tritanium® X PL Expandable Posterior Lumbar Cage and Tritanium® X TL Expandable Curved Posterior Lumbar Cage are intended for intervertebral body fusion with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft when the subject device is used as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1. DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. These DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have completed six months of non-operative treatment.

Additionally, the Tritanium® X PL Expandable Posterior Lumbar Cage and Tritanium® X TL Expandable Curved Posterior Lumbar Cage can be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis.

The Tritanium® X PL Expandable Posterior Lumbar Cage and Tritanium® X TL Expandable Curved Posterior Lumbar Cage are always to be used with supplemental internal spinal fixation. Additionally, the Tritanium® X PL Expandable Posterior Lumbar Cage and Tritanium® X TL Expandable Curved Posterior Lumbar Cage are to be used with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft when the subject device is used as an adjunct to fusion.

Stryker Spine VLIFT™ is a vertebral body replacement system intended to replace a vertebral body or an entire vertebra. It is for use in the thoracolumbar spine (TI-LS) to replace a collapsed, or unstable vertebral body or vertebra resected or excised during total and partial corpectomy and vertebrectomy procedures due to turnor of trauma (i.e., fracture). For both corpectomy and vertebrectomy procedures, the VLIFT™ system is intended to be used with supplemental internal fixation systems. The supplemental internal fixation systems that may be used with VLIFTM include, but are not limited to Stryker Spine plate or rod system, Spiral Radius 90D, and Trio). The use of bone graft with VLIFTTM is optional.

VLIFT®-s Vertebral Body Replacement System is indicated for use in the cervical spine (C3-C7) and the thoracolumbar spine (TI-L5) in skeletally mature patial or total replacement of a diseased, collapsed, damaged, or unstable vertebral body due to tumor, osteomyelitis, trauma (i.e., fracture), or for reconstruction following corpectorny performed to achieve decompression of the spinal cord and neural tissue in degenerative disorders.

The VLIFT®-s Vertebral Body Replacement System is intended for use with autograft or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft, as an adjunct to fusion. The VLIFT®-s Vertebral Body Replacement System is also intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion, with bone graft used at the surgeon's discretion.

The VLIFT®-s Vertebral Body Replacement System is intended to be used with FDA-cleared supplemental spinal fixation systems that have been labeled for use in the cervical, thoracic, and/or lumbar spine (i.e., posterior screw and rod systems, anterior plate systems, and rod systems). When used at more than two levels, supplemental fixation should include posterior fixation.

The subject devices consist of a variety of intervertebral body fusion devices and spinal vertebral body replacement devices designed to provide support across implanted levels of the cervical, thoracolumbar, and lumbosacral spine until fusion is achieved and have been previously cleared by FDA. The purpose of this submission is to establish an MR Conditional labeling claim for these implants.

This document is a 510(k) Summary for a range of spinal implants. The purpose of this submission is to establish an MR Conditional labeling claim for these implants. The submission does not detail specific acceptance criteria or performance metrics beyond stating that MR Compatibility testing was performed and met acceptance criteria.

Here's a breakdown of the requested information based on the provided text:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The document does not provide a table with specific quantitative acceptance criteria or reported device performance for the various spinal implants. It states generally:

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

• Sample Size: The document does not specify the exact sample size for the test set (number of devices tested).
• Data Provenance: The data appears to be from laboratory testing ("MR Compatibility testing per ASTM F2503-13 was performed"). There is no mention of country of origin for data or whether it was retrospective or prospective. Given the nature of MRI compatibility testing for medical implants, it would typically be prospective laboratory testing on a selection of devices.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

This information is not applicable. The "ground truth" for MRI compatibility testing of physical implants is based on validated test methods (ASTM F2503-13) and physical measurements of artifacts, heating, and forces, not expert consensus on interpretations.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

This information is not applicable. Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are typically used in clinical studies involving interpretation of medical images by multiple readers to establish a "ground truth" for diagnosis or assessment. MRI compatibility testing involves physical measurements.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

No. The document explicitly states this submission is to establish an MR Conditional labeling claim for physical implants. It is not a study comparing human reader performance with or without AI assistance.

6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Study

This information is not applicable. This submission is for physical medical devices (spinal implants) and their MRI compatibility, not an algorithm or AI system.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used

The ground truth for this type of submission is established through physical measurements and adherence to recognized standards (ASTM F2503-13) for evaluating MRI safety and compatibility of medical implants.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set

This information is not applicable. There is no AI or algorithm that requires a training set mentioned in this submission.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

This information is not applicable, as there is no training set for an AI/algorithm.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Stryker Spine Tritanium® PL Cage is an intervertebral body fusion device indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft when used as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1.

DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have six months of nonoperative therapy.

Additionally, the Tritanium® PL Cage can be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis.

The Tritanium® PL Cage is to be implanted via a posterior approach.

The Tritanium® PL Cage is intended to be used with supplemental spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the lumbosacral spine.

The Tritanium® PL Intervertebral Body Fusion Cage is intended for use as an aid in lumbar spinal fixation. The cage is a hollow, rectangular implant that consists of a unique configuration of both solid and porous structures that are simultaneously built using Laser Rapid Manufacturing (LRM) method applying Stryker's proprietary Tritanium® In-Growth Technology. The cage is offered in a variety of footprints to adapt to a variety of patient anatomies. It has serrations on the superior and inferior porous surfaces of the implant for fixation, an ergonomically shaped anterior edge, and a flat posterior edge. The implant is designed to be used with supplemental fixation cleared for use in the lumbosacral spine.

The Tritanium® PL Cages are constructed from Titanium alloy: Ti-6Al-4V (ASTM F1472-08) and are provided sterile.

The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device, the Tritanium® PL Cage. It outlines the device's indications for use, its characteristics, and references performance data to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a predicate device. However, this document does not describe acceptance criteria for a study proving device meets acceptance criteria, nor does it detail a clinical study with human readers or specific statistical performance metrics often associated with AI/software devices.

This document specifically focuses on a physical implant (intervertebral body fusion device) and its mechanical performance testing. The "Summary of Performance Data" refers to engineering analyses and mechanical tests, not clinical studies or AI algorithm performance.

Therefore, many of the requested fields cannot be filled from the provided text as they relate to AI/software performance evaluations.

Here's an attempt to answer based only on the information provided, highlighting what is not available:

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance

The document states that "Verification and validation activities demonstrated that all relevant acceptance criteria were met." However, it does not explicitly list the acceptance criteria themselves, nor does it provide specific numerical results of the device's performance against those criteria. Instead, it refers to multiple mechanical tests according to ASTM standards, implying that meeting the standards' requirements was the acceptance criteria.

Study Details (as inferable from the document)

1. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: This refers to the mechanical tests conducted. The document does not specify the number of samples (e.g., number of implants or test specimens) used for each mechanical test. Data provenance (country of origin, retrospective/prospective) is not applicable or stated for these engineering analyses and mechanical tests.

2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. The "ground truth" for these mechanical tests would be the physical properties and performance metrics measured according to the ASTM standards, not expert clinical interpretations.

3. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable. This relates to clinical studies with expert reviewers, not mechanical testing.

4. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This is for an AI/imaging device, not a physical implant.

5. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable. This is for an AI/software device, not a physical implant.

6. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.): For the mechanical tests, the "ground truth" is typically defined by the precise measurement outcomes of the physical tests according to established scientific and engineering principles and standards (e.g., maximum load at failure, displacement under load, wear rates).

7. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. This is for an AI/software device. The "Engineering Analysis" mentions two FEAs (Finite Element Analyses), which are computational simulations, but there is no "training set" in the context of device performance in this document.

8. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable. This is for an AI/software device.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Stryker Spine Tritanium® PL Cage is an intervertebral body fusion device indicated for use with autograft and/or allogenic bone graft comprised of cancellous and/or corticocancellous bone graft when used as an adjunct to fusion in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level or two contiguous levels from L2 to S1.

DDD is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies. The DDD patients may also have up to Grade I spondylolisthesis at the involved level(s). These patients should be skeletally mature and have six months of nonoperative therapy.

Additionally, the Tritanium® PL Cage can be used as an adjunct to fusion in patients diagnosed with degenerative scoliosis.

The Tritanium® PL Cage is to be implanted via a posterior approach.

The Tritanium® PL Cage is intended to be used with supplemental spinal fixation systems that have been cleared for use in the lumbosacral spine.

The Tritanium® PL Intervertebral Body Fusion Cage is intended for use as an aid in lumbar spinal fixation. The cage is a hollow, rectangular implant that consists of a unique configuration of both solid and porous structures that are simultaneously built using Laser Rapid Manufacturing (LRM) method applying Stryker's proprietary Tritanium® In-Growth Technology. The lordotic angles to adapt to a variety of patient anatomies. It has serrations on the superior and inferior porous surfaces of the implant for fixation, an ergonomically shaped anterior edge, and a flat posterior edge. The implant is designed to be used with supplemental fixation cleared for use in the lumbosacral spine. The Tritanium® PL cages are constructed from Titanium alloy: Ti-6Al-4V (ASTM F1472-08) and are provided sterile.

The provided text is related to a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device called the "Tritanium® PL Cage," an intervertebral body fusion device. The document primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices and does not detail a study involving AI or human reader performance. Therefore, I cannot provide information on the majority of the requested points.

However, I can extract the acceptance criteria and the summary of non-clinical testing for the device.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

The document describes non-clinical testing performed in compliance with specific guidance and ASTM standards to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The "reported device performance" is the successful compliance with these tests, indicating that the device met the required mechanical and material properties.

The following points cannot be answered based on the provided text, as the document describes a 510(k) submission for an intervertebral body fusion device focusing on mechanical and material testing, not a study involving AI for image analysis or human reader performance.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g., country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective): Not applicable/Not provided. The testing described is mechanical and material testing of the device itself, not a clinical study with patients or data.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g., radiologist with 10 years of experience): Not applicable/Not provided. Ground truth in the context of AI or diagnostic studies is not relevant to the mechanical device testing described.
4. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable/Not provided.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: No. This type of study was not conducted or reported.
6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: No. This is not an AI algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.): Not applicable/Not provided. The "ground truth" for this device would be its physical and mechanical properties as measured against established standards.
8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable/Not provided. This is not an AI algorithm, so there is no training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable/Not provided.

Ask a specific question about this device