Search Filters

Search Results

Found 2 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K251024
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2025-04-30

    (28 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    864.5425
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    TEG 6s Hemostasis System Citrated: K, KH, RT, FF Assay Cartridge

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The TEG 6s Hemostasis System is intended for in vitro diagnostic use to provide semi-quantitative indications of the hemostasis state of a 3.2% citrated whole blood sample. The Citrated: K, KH, RT, FF Assay Cartridge, to be used with the TEG 6s analyzer, contains four independent assays (CK, CKH, CRT, and CFF), described below.

    The CK assay monitors the hemostasis process via the intrinsic pathway in 3.2% citrated whole blood specimens on the TEG 6s System. Clotting characteristics are described by the functional parameters Clotting Time (R), Speed of Clot Formation (K and Alpha angle) and Maximum Clot Strength (MA).

    The CKH assay monitors the effects of heparin in 3.2% citrated whole blood specimens on the TEG 6s System. CKH is used in conjunction with CK, and heparin influence is determined by comparing Clotting Times (R) between the two tests.

    The CRT assay monitors the hemostasis process via both the intrinsic and extrinsic pathways in 3.2% citrated whole blood specimens on the TEG 6s System. Clotting characteristics are described by the functional parameter Maximum Clot Strength (MA). The CRT MA parameter is equivalent to the CK MA parameter but the final MA value is reached more quickly using the CRT assay.

    The CFF assay monitors hemostasis of 3.2% citrated whole blood specimens in the TEG 6s System after blocking platelet contributions to clot strength. Clotting characteristics are described by the functional parameters Maximum Clot Strength (MA) and the Estimated Functional Fibrinogen Level (FLEV).

    Results from the TEG 6s analysis should not be the sole basis for a patient diagnosis, but should be evaluated together with the patient's medical history, the clinical picture and, if necessary, further hemostasis tests. The indication for TEG 6s System use is with adult patients where an evaluation of their blood hemostasis properties is desired. Hemostasis evaluations are commonly used to assess clinical conditions in cardiovascular surgery and cardiology procedures to assess hemorrhage or thrombosis conditions before, during and following the procedure. The TEG 6s Hemostasis System can be used in the laboratory or at the point-of-care.

    Device Description

    The TEG® 6s Hemostasis System (TEG® Hemostasis analyzer and TEG® 6s Assay Cartridges) is intended for in vitro diagnostic use to provide semi-quantitative indications of a blood sample's ability to form and maintain a clot. The TEG® 6s Hemostasis System records the kinetic changes in a sample of whole blood as the sample clots, retracts and/or lyses. The system output consists of a table of numerical values and graphs resulting from the hemostasis process over time. This information can be used by clinicians to aid in determining if a clotting dysfunction or coagulopathy is present.

    To perform a test, a disposable TEG® 6s Assay Cartridge is inserted into the TEG® 6s Hemostasis analyzer. The instrument reads the bar code on the cartridge and identifies the type of cartridge for operator confirmation. Blood (collected in a 3.2% sodium citrate tube) or Quality Control (QC) material is added to the entry port on the cartridge and drawn into the cartridge under the TEG® 6s Hemostasis analyzer control. The amount of the sample drawn into the cartridge is determined by the pre-set volume of the blood chambers in the cartridge. Once in the cartridge, the sample is metered into as many as 4 separate analysis channels, depending upon the assays being performed. Reconstitution of reagents dried within the cartridge is accomplished by moving the sample back and forth through reagent chambers, under the control of microfluidic valves and bellows (pumps) within the cartridge. After each sample has been mixed with reagent, it is delivered to a test cell where it is monitored for viscoelastic changes due to coagulation. Excess sample material is moved under microfluidic control into an enclosed waste chamber within the cartridge.

    The TEG® 6s technology is based on a disposable cartridge containing up to 4 independent measurement cells. Each cell consists of a short vertically-oriented injection molded tube (ring). Detection of clotting in the TEG® 6s Hemostasis System is performed optically. A piezoelectric actuator vibrates the measurement cell(s) through a motion profile composed of summed sinusoids at different frequencies. The movement of the measurement cells will induce motion in the sample meniscus, which will be detected by a photodiode. The resulting motion of the meniscus is monitored optically and analyzed by the instrument to calculate the resonant frequency and modulus of elasticity (stiffness) of the sample. By performing a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) on meniscus motion data, the resonant frequencies can be determined. The analyzer monitors the harmonic motion of a hanging drop of blood in response to external vibration. As the sample transitions from a liquid state to a gel-like state during clotting, the modulus of elasticity (stiffness) and therefore resonant frequency increase. The TEG® 6s Hemostasis analyzer measures these variations in resonant frequency during clotting and lysis.

    Resonance is the tendency of a material or structure to oscillate with greater amplitude at some frequencies than others. The exact frequencies at which resonance occurs will depend on the stiffness and mass of the sample. Stiffness, in turn, is a function of a material's modulus of elasticity and the boundary conditions to which the material is exposed, such as the geometry and materials of a test cell. By holding these boundary conditions and sample mass constant from sample to sample, the TEG® 6s Hemostasis System allows direct comparison of elasticity between samples. The output measurements are displayed in a table and on a graphical tracing that reflects the hemostasis profile of the clot formation.

    In a typical test, blood that has been delivered to the measurement cell will not clot for several minutes. During this time the sample has no inherent stiffness except that provided by surface tension, and since this remains constant the measured resonant frequencies will not change. Once clotting begins, however, the elastic modulus and thus the resonant frequencies increase rapidly. During fibrinolysis, the process is reversed, with elastic modulus and resonant frequencies decreasing. In tests where clotting does not occur, the resonant frequency of the sample will not change. During coagulation, however, a clot will bind to the ring contained in the cartridge and the resonant frequency will rise with increasing firmness of the clot. The TEG® 6s Hemostasis Analyzer collects meniscus motion data, tracks changing resonant frequencies and analyzes the frequency data to provide semi-quantitative parameters describing the clot.

    The TEG® 6s Hemostasis System monitors the interaction of platelets within the fibrin mesh of the clot during clot formation and lysis, all in a whole-blood setting. The TEG® 6s Hemostasis System uses thromboelastography to provide continuous measurement of clot elasticity.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for the TEG 6s Hemostasis System. This type of submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than providing the detailed acceptance criteria and study data often found in novel device approvals or publications on algorithmic performance.

    Therefore, the document does not contain the level of detail requested for many of the points, especially those related to AI algorithm performance (e.g., sample sizes for test/training sets, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, ground truth establishment for training). The device described is an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) system that measures blood coagulation properties, suggesting a direct measurement rather than an AI-driven interpretation of complex data like images.

    Below is an attempt to extract and infer information based on the provided text, while also clearly indicating what information is not available in this document.


    Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance Study

    The document primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than providing specific acceptance criteria for a novel device or an AI algorithm. The core of the study described is a comparison of the modified device's performance against its predicate and within different sample matrices.

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Parameter CategoryAcceptance Criteria (Inferred from "met clinically acceptable bias limits")Reported Device Performance
    Sample Matrix EquivalenceNo statistical difference in agreement between TEG 6s and TEG 5000 by blood source.Demonstrated.
    Predicate Bias (Comparison between new and predicate cartridge types)Bias met clinically acceptable bias limits across all parameters for TEG 6s Citrated: K, KH, RT, FF vs. TEG 6s Citrated: K, KH, RTH, FFH.Demonstrated.

    Note: Specific numerical acceptance criteria (e.g., ±X% bias) are not provided in this document. The document states that the bias "met clinically acceptable bias limits," but the limits themselves are not specified.

    2. Sample Sizes and Data Provenance for the Test Set

    • Sample Size for Test Set: Not specified in the document.
    • Data Provenance: The document mentions "an observational study" for the agreement analysis between TEG 6s and TEG 5000 by blood source. It does not specify the country of origin of the data or whether it was retrospective or prospective.

    3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth

    This information is not applicable/not provided for this type of IVD device clearance. The device measures physical properties of blood, and the "ground truth" for its performance would typically involve comparison to established laboratory methods or accepted clinical standards rather than expert consensus on subjective interpretations.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    This information is not applicable/not provided. Adjudication methods are typically used in studies involving subjective interpretations (e.g., image reading) where multiple experts might disagree. This device measures quantifiable physiological parameters.

    5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

    Not performed/not applicable. An MRMC study is relevant to subjective interpretation tasks, often in medical imaging, where human readers interact with AI. This device directly measures blood coagulation parameters, so there is no "human reader" in the AI sense, nor is there an "AI assistance" component described.

    6. Standalone Performance Study (Algorithm Only)

    Not performed/not applicable. The TEG 6s Hemostasis System, as described, is a physical instrument that performs direct measurements. It is not an "algorithm only" device or an AI system in the typical sense that would have a standalone performance study independent of human interaction. The "algorithm" here refers to the internal processing of sensor data to derive hemostasis parameters. Its performance is intrinsically linked to the physical measurement system.

    7. Type of Ground Truth Used

    The ground truth used for this device would be the quantitative measurements of hemostatic parameters from established, validated laboratory methods or from the predicate device itself. The document mentions:

    • Agreement analysis with TEG 5000 (a prior generation or related device).
    • Comparison with predicate TEG 6s Citrated: K, KH, RT, FF (K243858).

    8. Sample Size for the Training Set

    The concept of a "training set" in the context of machine learning is not applicable to this device as described in the provided document. The device performs direct physical measurements rather than learning from a dataset via an AI algorithm. Therefore, no training set size is reported.

    9. How Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    Not applicable, as there is no "training set" or AI algorithm in the described context.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K243858
    Date Cleared
    2025-01-15

    (30 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    864.5425
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    TEG 6s Hemostasis System Citrated: K, KH, RT, FF Assay Cartridge

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The TEG 6s Hemostasis System is intended for in vitro diagnostic use to provide semi-quantitative indications of the hemostasis state of a venous blood sample. The Citrated: K, KH, RT, FF Assay Cartridge, to be used with the TEG 6s analyzer, contains four independent assays (CK, CKH, CRT, and CFF), described below.

    The CK assay monitors the hemostasis process via the intrinsic pathway in 3.2% citrated whole blood specimens on the TEG 6s System. Clotting characteristics are described by the functional parameters Clotting Time (R), Speed of Clot Formation (K and Alpha angle) and Maximum Clot Strength (MA).

    The CKH assay monitors the effects of heparin in 3.2% citrated whole blood specimens on the TEG 6s System. CKH is used in conjunction with CK, and heparin influence is determined by comparing Clotting Times (R) between the two tests.

    The CRT assay monitors the hemostasis process via both the intrinsic and extrinsic pathways in 3.2% citrated whole blood specimens on the TEG 6s System. Clotting characteristics are described by the functional parameter Maximum Clot Strength (MA). The CRT MA parameter is equivalent to the CK MA parameter but the final MA value is reached more quickly using the CRT assay.

    The CFF assay monitors hemostasis of 3.2% citrated whole blood specimens in the TEG 6s System after blocking platelet contributions to clot strength. Clotting characteristics are described by the functional parameters Maximum Clot Strength (MA) and the Estimated Functional Fibrinogen Level (FLEV).

    Results from the TEG 6s analysis should not be the sole basis for a patient diagnosis, but should be evaluated together with the patient's medical history, the clinical picture and, if necessary, further hemostasis tests. The indication for TEG 6s System use is with adult patients where an evaluation of their blood hemostasis properties is desired. Hemostasis evaluations are commonly used to assess clinical conditions in cardiovascular surgery and cardiology procedures to assess hemorrhage or thrombosis conditions before, during and following the procedure. The TEG 6s Hemostasis System can be used in the laboratory or at the point-of-care.

    Device Description

    The TEG® 6s Hemostasis System (TEG® Hemostasis analyzer and TEG® 6s Assay Cartridges) is intended for in vitro diagnostic use to provide semi-quantitative indications of a blood sample's ability to form and maintain a clot. The TEG® 6s Hemostasis System records the kinetic changes in a sample of whole blood as the sample clots, retracts and/or lyses. The system output consists of a table of numerical values and graphs resulting from the hemostasis process over time. This information can be used by clinicians to aid in determining if a clotting dysfunction or coagulopathy is present.

    To perform a test, a disposable TEG® 6s Assay Cartridge is inserted into the TEG® 6s Hemostasis analyzer. The instrument reads the bar code on the cartridge and identifies the type of cartridge for operator confirmation. Blood (collected in a 3.2% sodium citrate tube) or Quality Control (QC) material is added to the entry port on the cartridge and drawn into the cartridge under the TEG® 6s Hemostasis analyzer control. The amount of the sample drawn into the cartridge is determined by the pre-set volume of the blood chambers in the cartridge. Once in the cartridge, the sample is metered into as many as 4 separate analysis channels, depending upon the assays being performed. Reconstitution of reagents dried within the cartridge is accomplished by moving the sample back and forth through reagent chambers, under the control of microfluidic valves and bellows (pumps) within the cartridge. After each sample has been mixed with reagent, it is delivered to a test cell where it is monitored for viscoelastic changes due to coagulation. Excess sample material is moved under microfluidic control into an enclosed waste chamber within the cartridge.

    The TEG® 6s technology is based on a disposable cartridge containing up to 4 independent measurement cells. Each cell consists of a short vertically-oriented injection molded tube (ring). Detection of clotting in the TEG® 6s Hemostasis System is performed optically. A piezoelectric actuator vibrates the measurement cell(s) through a motion profile composed of summed sinusoids at different frequencies. The movement of the measurement cells will induce motion in the sample meniscus, which will be detected by a photodiode. The resulting motion of the meniscus is monitored optically and analyzed by the instrument to calculate the resonant frequency and modulus of elasticity (stiffness) of the sample. By performing a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) on meniscus motion data, the resonant frequencies can be determined. The analyzer monitors the harmonic motion of a hanging drop of blood in response to external vibration. As the sample transitions from a liquid state to a gel-like state during clotting, the modulus of elasticity (stiffness) and therefore resonant frequency increase. The TEG® 6s Hemostasis analyzer measures these variations in resonant frequency during clotting and lysis.

    Resonance is the tendency of a material or structure to oscillate with greater amplitude at some frequencies than others. The exact frequencies at which resonance occurs will depend on the stiffness and mass of the sample. Stiffness, in turn, is a function of a material's modulus of elasticity and the boundary conditions to which the material is exposed, such as the geometry and materials of a test cell. By holding these boundary conditions and sample mass constant from sample to sample, the TEG® 6s Hemostasis System allows direct comparison of elasticity between samples. The output measurements are displayed in a table and on a graphical tracing that reflects the hemostasis profile of the clot formation.

    In a typical test, blood that has been delivered to the measurement cell will not clot for several minutes. During this time the sample has no inherent stiffness except that provided by surface tension, and since this remains constant the measured resonant frequencies will not change.

    Once clotting begins, however, the elastic modulus and thus the resonant frequencies increase rapidly. During fibrinolysis, the process is reversed, with elastic modulus and resonant frequencies decreasing. In tests where clotting does not occur, the resonant frequency of the sample will not change. During coagulation, however, a clot will bind to the ring contained in the cartridge and the resonant frequency will rise with increasing firmness of the Clot. The TEC® 6s Hemostasis Analyzer collects meniscus motion data, tracks changing resonant frequencies and analyzes the frequency data to provide semi-quantitative parameters describing the clot.

    The TEG® 6s Hemostasis System monitors the interaction of platelets within the fibrin mesh of the clot during clot formation and lysis, all in a whole-blood setting. The TEG® 6s Hemostasis System uses thromboelastography to provide continuous measurement of clot elasticity.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) Summary for the Haemonetics TEG® 6s Hemostasis System, specifically for the Citrated: K, KH, RT, FF Assay Cartridge. Its primary purpose is to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a predicate device (K150041). As such, it focuses on comparing the proposed device to the predicate rather than detailing a study that establishes novel acceptance criteria or proves performance against new, distinct benchmarks requiring extensive clinical trials with human-in-the-loop or standalone AI performance.

    The document states: "There is no change to the technology, design of the device, reported parameters, or mechanics of how the cartridge is run on the TEG® 6s analyzer. No additional product development of the TEG® 6s system was required." The only change mentioned is an expansion of the "Use Location" from "clinical laboratory" to "clinical laboratory or at the point-of-care."

    Therefore, the document does not contain the detailed information necessary to answer the prompt's request for:

    • A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance for a new device or significant modification requiring such a study. Instead, it relies on the predicate's established performance.
    • Sample sizes, data provenance, expert ground truth establishment, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone AI performance, or training set details as these are typically required for demonstrating efficacy or superiority of a new or substantially modified device, especially AI/ML-driven ones.

    The document is a submission for substantial equivalence for a minor modification (expanded use location) of an already cleared device, not a submission for a novel device or a device with a new AI/ML component that requires extensive performance validation against a defined ground truth.

    Therefore, based solely on the provided text, I cannot extract the information required by your prompt, as the study described is a demonstration of substantial equivalence via comparison to a predicate, not an independent performance study of a novel device against predefined acceptance criteria for its core functionality.

    The "study" described is a regulatory comparison. The "acceptance criteria" are effectively that the modified device performs equivalently to the predicate device, especially in the expanded use environment. No specific performance metrics or detailed study results are presented because the core technology and measured parameters are unchanged from the predicate.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1