Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(246 days)
Spectral CT on Rails
The Spectral CT on Rails is a Computed Tomography X-Ray System intended to produce cross-sectional images of the body by computer reconstruction of x-ray transmission data taken at different angles and planes. This device may include signal analysis and display equipment, patient and equipment supports, component parts, and accessories. The Spectral CT on Rails system acquires one CT dataset – composed of data from a higher-energy detected x-ray spectrum and a lower- energy detected x-ray spectra may be used to analyze the differences in the energy dependence of the attenuation coefficient of different materials. This allows for the generation of images at energies selected from the available spectrum and to provide information about the chemical composition of the body materials and/or contrast agents. Additionally, materials analysis provides for the quantification and graphical display of attenuation, material density, and effective atomic number.
This information may be used by a trained healthcare professional as a diagnostic tool for the visualization and analysis of anatomical and pathological structures in patients of all ages, and to be used for diagnostic imaging in radiology, interventional radiology, and cardiology and in oncology.
The system is also intended to be used for low dose CT lung cancer screening for the early detection of lung nodules that may represent cancer*.
The screening must be performed within the established inclusion criteria of programs / protocols that have been approved and published by either a governmental body or professional medical society.
*Please refer to clinical literature, including the results of the National Lung Screening Trial (N Engl. J Med 2011; 365:395-409) and subsequent literature, for further information.
The proposed Spectral CT on Rails System is a whole-body computed tomography (CT) X-Ray System featuring a continuously rotating x-ray tube and detectors gantry and multi-slice capability. The acquired x-ray transmission data is reconstructed by computer into cross-sectional images of the body taken at different angles and planes. The proposed Spectral CT on Rails System consists of three main components: a rotating gantry that slides on a carriage in the horizontal direction, stationary patient support and an operator console for scan control and image reconstruction. On the gantry, the main active components are the X-ray HV power supply, the X-ray tube and the detection system. The fundamental design and characteristics of the main components used in the proposed Spectral CT on Rails System, are identical to the cleared to market primary predicate device, Spectral CT System (K203020). The proposed Spectral CT on Rails System consists of main components that are similar to the cleared for market primary predicate device, Spectral CT (K203020) Gantry. The Gantry consists of the following main internal units: Stator - a fixed mechanical frame that carries HW and SW Rotor - A rotating circular stiff frame that is mounted in and supported by the stator. X-Ray Tube (XRT) and its power Generator, and the upper beam mechanism – fixed to the Rotor frame Rails - the rails system includes a carriage which the gantry sits on so that it may be moved back and forth on the rails horizontally relative to a stationary patient support that the patient lays on. The moving gantry functionality has previously been cleared in, Philips CT Big Bore Sliding Gantry Configuration (K181797), secondary predicate device. Data Measurement System (DMS) – a detectors array, fixed to the rotor in front of the XRT.
Console - A computer and display that interfaces between the system and the user. Common Image Reconstruction Unit (CIRS) – a dedicated powerful image reconstruction system
In addition to the above components and the operating software, the system includes: Workstation hardware and software for data acquisition and image display, manipulation, storage, and filming; as well as post-processing into views other than the original axial images. Spectral Reconstruction System Spectral CT Viewer.
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information for the Philips Medical Systems Nederland B.V. Spectral CT on Rails (K212875), based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
The document primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device (Spectral CT K203020) rather than listing explicit quantitative acceptance criteria for each image quality metric. Instead, the acceptance criterion for the Spectral CT on Rails is that its performance is "equivalent" to the predicate device.
Feature / Acceptance Criterion | Reported Device Performance (Spectral CT on Rails) |
---|---|
Technological Characteristics | |
Application | Identical to predicate device (Head, Body, Cardiac) |
Scan Regime | Identical to predicate device (Continuous Rotation) |
Scan Field of View | Identical to predicate device (Up to 500 mm) |
Scan modes | Identical to predicate device (Surview, Axial-after-Axial, Dynamic Scan, Helical Scan) |
Spatial Resolution | Identical to predicate device (16 lp/cm max (high mode), 13 lp/cm max (standard mode)) |
Low Contrast Resolution (20 cm Catphan phantom) | Identical to predicate device (4 mm @ 0.3% @ 25 mGy CTDIvol) |
Minimum Scan Time | Identical to predicate device (0.18 sec for 240° rotation, 0.27 sec for 360° rotation) |
Number of Slices | Identical to predicate device (Up to 128 slices of 0.625 mm) |
Scan Coverage | Identical to predicate device (Scanner Center of Rotation (COR) is up to 80 mm) |
Noise in Standard Mode (21.6 cm water-equivalent) | Identical to predicate device (0.27% at 27 mGy) |
Image Matrix | Identical to predicate device (Up to 1024 x 1024) |
Display (Pixels) | Identical to predicate device (1024 x 1280) |
Communication | Identical to predicate device (Compliance with DICOM 3.0) |
Detectors Type & Material | Identical to predicate device (NanoPanel Prism, Solid-state yttrium-based scintillator, GOS + Photodiode) |
DMS Detector & Structure | Identical to predicate device (8 cm - Dual-Layer scintillator, up to 128 detector rows, Spherical DMS structure) |
Detector & Collimation Structure | Identical to predicate device (0.625 mm and various combinations listed) |
Slice thickness | Identical to predicate device (Various options: 0.67 - 10 mm for helical, 0.625 – 20 for axial) |
Gantry rotation speed | Identical to predicate device (0.27 sec - 1.5 sec (360°), 0.18 sec, 0.2 sec (240°)) |
Bore size | Identical to predicate device (800 mm) |
Operator Controls on Gantry | Identical to predicate device (Touch Panel Controls) |
Eclipse Collimation | Identical to predicate device (A-Plane) |
Generator and Tube Power / kV Setting / mA Range | Identical to predicate device (120kW, 80 100 120 140 kVp, 10-1000 mA) |
Focal Spot | Identical to predicate device (x- and z-deflection) |
Conventional Reconstruction Speed | Identical to predicate device (40 images per second) |
X-Ray Tube Type | Identical to predicate device (iMRC) |
Couch (Patient Support) | Substantially Equivalent (Couch is stationary, Gantry slides horizontally; predicate couch was mobile). Acceptance: This change does not introduce new hazards, has no effect on safety/effectiveness, and moving gantry functionality was previously cleared (K181797). |
Horizontal Movements, min increments | Identical to predicate device (0.1mm) |
Horizontal position precision planning | Identical to predicate device (0.1mm) |
Horizontal speed | Different (Max Speed = 200 mm/sec for proposed; 600 mm/sec for predicate). Acceptance: This difference does not raise new questions for safety/effectiveness, and moving gantry functionality was previously cleared (K181797). |
Collision envelope | Identical to predicate device (25 mm gap met, operator monitors motion) |
Technical Basis for Collection of two CT Spectra | Identical to predicate device (Dual Layer DMS (Spectral Detector)) |
Spectral Base Images | Identical to predicate device (Low-energy, High-energy, Photoelectric, Compton Scatter) |
Spectral results available [kVp] | Identical to predicate device (100kVp, 120kVp, 140kVp) |
Spectral Results Images | Identical to predicate device (Monoenergetic, Materials Basis/Density Pairs, Effective Atomic Number, Material Separation/Differentiation, Attenuation Curves, Density Measurements/Visualization, Reduction of Beam Hardening, Reduction of Calcium Blooming, Calcium Suppression Index, Electron Density, Cardiac) |
Cardiac reconstruction method | Identical to predicate device (Standard ECG Gated, Motion Compensated Reconstruction (MCR) (optional)) |
Virtual Tilt Viewer (VTV) | Identical to predicate device (Yes) |
HOST Drives | Identical to predicate device (One 256 GB SSD, one 6 TB 7200 RPM HDD) |
Host Infrastructure | Identical to predicate device (Windows 10) |
CIRS Computers | Identical to predicate device (CIRS Rack with two HP Z8 servers, option for two additional) |
CPUs | Identical to predicate device (In each HP Z8: Dual Intel Gold 6230 with 20 cores at 2.1GHz each) |
CIRS Drives | Identical to predicate device (In each HP Z8: 512GB NVMe SSD, Two 2TB NVMe SSDs) |
Interventional features and controls (Dose alerts) | Enhanced from active interruption to passive indication. Acceptance: Workflow improvement, follows NEMA XR-25 (2019) standard, successfully verified, no new safety/effectiveness questions. |
Interventional features and controls (Check scan) | Enhanced to link helical scan to CCT scan. Acceptance: Workflow improvement, user comport, successfully verified, no new safety/effectiveness questions. |
Interventional features and controls (Patient info) | Enhanced to reuse patient info from compatible Angio system. Acceptance: Workflow improvement, successfully verified, no new safety/effectiveness questions. |
Interventional features and controls (Errors/warnings) | Enhanced to display rail system errors/warnings on IVC box. Acceptance: Usability improvement, successfully verified, no new safety/effectiveness questions. |
Interventional features and controls (Display Layouts/Roadmaps) | Enhanced to offer multiple display layouts (1, 3, or 5 images) with 0, 1, or 2 reference images. Acceptance: Usability improvement, successfully verified, no new safety/effectiveness questions. |
Interventional features and controls (Real time CCT locations on Surview) | Enhanced to display indicators (Current Gantry position, Last CCT, Active Viewport) on reference surview. Acceptance: Usability improvement, successfully verified, no new safety/effectiveness questions. |
Interventional features and controls (Mirror options harmonization) | Enhanced to apply selected orientation for all completed and successive results. Acceptance: Workflow improvement, user comport, successfully verified, no new safety/effectiveness questions. |
Interventional features and controls (Start Helical Scan/CCT from Exam/Control Room) | Enhanced to start Helical scan with CCT Pedal and CCT Single shot with CT Box Manual button. Acceptance: Workflow improvement, user comport, successfully verified, no new safety/effectiveness questions. |
Interventional features and controls (Scan Position on Plan Viewer) | Enhanced to automatically update scan plan box to match selected bookmark position. Acceptance: Usability improvement, successfully verified, no new safety/effectiveness questions. |
Interventional features and controls (Multi Planner Results (MPR) Improvements) | Enhanced to automatically generate oblique results for subsequent scans based on a previous scan. Acceptance: Workflow improvement, easy setup, successfully verified, no new safety/effectiveness questions. |
Interventional features and controls (Push all images in one request) | Enhanced to allow user to send all images together to a remote device. Acceptance: Data connectivity improvement, successfully verified, no new safety/effectiveness questions. |
Interventional features and controls (Scan ruler improvements) | Enhanced to hide/unhide SW Interventional Controls in Console UI. Acceptance: Usability improvement, successfully verified, no new safety/effectiveness questions. |
Interventional features and controls (Control Laser from Consoles) | Enhanced to control laser markers from the console UI (in addition to IVC and gantry panel). Acceptance: Workflow improvement, user comport, successfully verified, no new safety/effectiveness questions. |
Overall Safety and Effectiveness | Demonstrated to be as safe and effective as the predicate device, with no new safety and/or effectiveness concerns. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:
- Sample Size for Anthropomorphic Phantom Image Review Testing: Not explicitly stated, but it involved "an anthropomorphic phantom" scanned on both the proposed device and the predicate device. It implies a single phantom, however, multiple "scans" were performed.
- Sample Size for Image Quality Performance Testing: Not explicitly stated, but involved "physics image quality test phantoms" scanned on both devices. It implies multiple phantoms covering different image quality metrics.
- Data Provenance: The data is generated internally by Philips through testing of their devices (proposed and predicate). It is not retrospective or prospective clinical data from patients but rather non-clinical phantom-based image quality data. The country of origin of the data is not specified beyond being Philips' internal testing.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications:
- Anthropomorphic Phantom Image Review Testing: The review was performed to "determine if the two scanners produced comparable image quality." It does not specify the number or qualifications of experts involved in this review. It states "After the review of the clinical scenarios it was concluded..." This suggests a qualitative assessment by an unnamed reviewer(s).
- Image Quality Performance Testing: This involved quantitative measurements on physics phantoms. Ground truth is established by the known physical properties and measurement methods for metrics like CT number, uniformity, noise, spatial resolution, etc., rather than expert reader consensus. Therefore, no "experts" in the sense of radiologists establishing ground truth for clinical cases are mentioned for this type of test.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:
- For the anthropomorphic phantom image review, the document simply states "Each scan was reviewed to determine if the two scanners produced comparable image quality" and "it was concluded that the image quality... was equivalent." No specific adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1) is mentioned.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done:
- No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was done. The submission states: "The subject of this premarket submission, the proposed Spectral CT on Rails did not require clinical studies to support equivalence Clinical Performance Data." The studies performed were non-clinical image quality comparisons.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
- The Spectral CT on Rails is a complete computed tomography x-ray system, not an AI algorithm. Therefore, the concept of "standalone (algorithm only)" doesn't directly apply here in the way it would for an AI-powered diagnostic software. The device's performance, as a system, was evaluated.
- However, the image quality performance testing can be considered an objective, quantitative assessment of the system's output (images) without human interpretation influencing the primary metrics being measured (CT number, noise, spatial resolution, etc.). The anthropomorphic phantom review has a human qualitative component, but the quantitative image quality metrics are standalone.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used:
- Phantom-based Ground Truth: For the "Image quality performance testing," the ground truth is established by the known physical characteristics of the test phantoms (e.g., Catphan phantom for low contrast resolution) and the objective physical measurements performed on the acquired images.
- Qualitative Comparison for Anthropomorphic Phantom: For the "Anthropomorphic phantom image review testing," the ground truth for "comparable image quality for typical clinical applications" is based on a qualitative review, implicitly against established expectations for CT image quality and the predicate device's performance.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set:
- This submission describes a hardware and software system ("Spectral CT on Rails"), not an AI/Machine Learning model that requires a "training set" in the conventional sense. The "training" for such a system typically involves engineering design, development, and validation against specifications, not data-driven machine learning training. Therefore, no training set sample size is applicable or provided.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established:
- As concluded in point 8, this question is not applicable as there is no "training set" for an AI/ML model described in this submission for this device.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1