Search Results

SupraMESH EXTRA™ nylon mesh is indicated for use as a hernia mesh and for plastic and reconstructive surgery.

SupraMESH EXTRA™ nylon mesh is an 18" x 18" mesh panel woven from USP size 3-0 SUPRAMID EXTRA® nylon suture (FDA N80-838). The nylon used to manufacture this SUPRAMID EXTRA® nylon suture (FDA N80-838) is nylon 6. The knit description of the SupraMESH EXTRA™ nylon mesh panel is 1 x 1 Tricot stitch mesh.

This document is a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device called SupraMESH EXTRA™. It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than presenting a study proving the device meets a new set of acceptance criteria. Therefore, most of the requested information regarding acceptance criteria and performance studies is not available in this document.

Here's what can be extracted based on the provided text:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

The document asserts "substantial equivalence" based on the predicate device. It doesn't define new acceptance criteria that the SupraMESH EXTRA™ device must meet with new performance data. The "performance" is considered equivalent to the predicate.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:

• Sample Size for Test Set: Not applicable. This is a substantial equivalence submission, not a study with a test set. There are no new patient data presented to evaluate the device.
• Data Provenance: Not applicable for a performance study. K831723, K852011, and K831724 are prior 510(k) notifications for the predicate devices. The current submission relies on the established safety and effectiveness of these predicate devices.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications:

• Not applicable. No ground truth establishment for a new test set is described.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:

• Not applicable.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:

• No. This type of study is not mentioned or implied.

6. Standalone Performance Study (Algorithm only without human-in-the-loop):

• No. This is not an AI/algorithm device.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used:

• The "ground truth" for this submission is implicitly the established safety and effectiveness of the predicate devices (Supramid Extra Surgical Mesh, FDA K831723, K852011, and K831724) based on their prior clearances and regulatory history. The current device is being compared to these, not to raw pathology or outcomes data.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set:

• Not applicable. This is not an AI/machine learning device that requires a training set.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:

• Not applicable.

In summary: This document is a 510(k) summary for a medical device. It demonstrates substantial equivalence to previously cleared predicate devices rather than presenting the results of a new clinical or performance study against specific acceptance criteria. Therefore, most of the questions related to new performance testing, sample sizes, and expert review do not apply to this type of submission.

Ask a specific question about this device