Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K030161
    Device Name
    SUPERBOND
    Date Cleared
    2003-03-17

    (60 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.3710
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    SUPERBOND

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Superbond (Ceramic Dental Casting Alloy) is for the use in Dental Laboratories, suitable for use in fabrication of metal-ceramic dental restoration.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for a dental alloy named "Superbond". It's a regulatory approval, not a scientific study report describing acceptance criteria and device performance in the way you've outlined. Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information from the provided text.

    The document primarily focuses on:

    • Device identification: Superbond, a Ceramic Dental Casting Alloy.
    • Regulatory classification: Class II, Product Code EJH.
    • Substantial equivalence determination: The FDA found it substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices.
    • Intended use: For use in Dental Laboratories, suitable for use in the fabrication of metal-ceramic dental restoration.
    • Regulatory compliance: Information about general controls provisions and other FDA regulations.

    It does not contain any information about:

    • Specific acceptance criteria for performance metrics (e.g., accuracy, sensitivity, specificity).
    • Results of a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria.
    • Sample sizes, data provenance, expert qualifications, or adjudication methods for a test set.
    • MRMC studies or standalone algorithm performance.
    • Ground truth types or training set details.

    To address your request, a different type of document, such as a clinical study report, a technical performance study report, or the 510(k) summary (which sometimes includes more detail on performance data if applicable to the device type), would be needed.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1