Search Results

The Straumann Temporary Coping is a coping intended to serve as a base for a temporary restoration.

The Straumann Temporary Coping is a coping intended to serve as a base for a temporary restoration. The temporary coping fits over the Straumann solid abulments and has radial projections that facilitate the retention of added acrylic or composite materials to form a temporary restoration.

The provided text is a 510(k) summary for a medical device (Straumann Temporary Coping) and does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving that the device meets such criteria.

The FDA 510(k) process for this type of device (Straumann Temporary Coping, classified as an accessory to a dental implant abutment, NHA) primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices, rather than establishing acceptance criteria and conducting a performance study against those criteria in the same way one might for a novel diagnostic AI algorithm.

Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for the specific points, as the provided text does not contain the necessary information. The document focuses on:

• Device Description: What the Straumann Temporary Coping is and its intended use.
• Predicate Devices: Identifying similar devices already on the market.
• Basis for Substantial Equivalence: Arguing that the new device is similar in design and intended use to the predicate devices.
• Regulatory Clearance: The FDA's letter granting clearance based on substantial equivalence.

There is no mention of:

• A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
• Sample sizes for test sets, data provenance.
• Number of experts or their qualifications for ground truth.
• Adjudication methods.
• MRMC comparative effectiveness studies.
• Standalone algorithm performance.
• Type of ground truth used.
• Sample size for training sets.
• How ground truth for training was established.

This is because the Straumann Temporary Coping is a physical dental accessory, not a software-based diagnostic device where such performance metrics and studies would typically be required for a 510(k) submission. For physical devices, particularly those claiming substantial equivalence, the focus is often on material biocompatibility, mechanical properties (if relevant), and functional similarity to predicates, rather than statistical performance against expert-derived ground truth on image data.

Ask a specific question about this device