Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K051836
    Date Cleared
    2005-11-21

    (138 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.3300
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    SKELITE RESORBABLE CEMENT RESTRICTOR

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Skelite™ Resorbable Cement Restrictor is intended to be used in orthopaedic surgeries, such as those involving the femoral and tibia canals in hip stem and total knee replacement. This device is not appropriate for acetabular cup surgeries, nor is it intended for any spinal indications.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for the Skelite™ Resorbable Cement Restrictor. It does not contain any information regarding acceptance criteria or the study that proves the device meets those criteria.

    This letter is a regulatory document stating that the FDA has determined the device is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices. It includes:

    • Trade/Device Name: Skelite™ Resorbable Cement Restrictor
    • Regulation Number and Name: 21 CFR 878.3300, Surgical mesh
    • Regulatory Class: II
    • Product Code: JDK
    • Date of Clearance: November 21, 2005
    • Intended Use: Orthopaedic surgeries involving femoral and tibia canals in hip stem and total knee replacement.
    • Limitations: Specifically states "THIS DEVICE IS NOT INTENDED FOR ANY SPINAL INDICATIONS. WARNING: THE SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS DEVICE WHEN IMPLANTED IN THE SPINE HAVE NOT BEEN ESTABLISHED."

    To answer your request about acceptance criteria and the supporting study, you would need to refer to the original 510(k) submission (K051836) itself, which is not provided here. The 510(k) submission would contain the detailed information on testing, performance data, and how the manufacturer demonstrated substantial equivalence to a predicate device.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information from the given document as it is outside the scope of this regulatory clearance letter.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1