Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K111841
    Date Cleared
    2012-03-01

    (246 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    880.5860
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Predicate For
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Shifeng Disposable Syringe with or without needle are intended to be used to inject fluid into, or withdraw fluids from, part of the body below the surface of the skin.

    Device Description

    The ShiFeng Disposable Syringe is a sterile, single use device consisting of a needle attached to a syringe. The ShiFeng Disposable Syringe manufactured by Chengdu Xinjin Shifeng Medical Apparatus & Instruments Co., Ltd., China is substantially equivalent to the IMC Piston syringe with Hypodermic Lumen Needle manufactured by IMC and cleared under K102969. The device consists of a metal tube that is sharpened at one end and the end joined to a female connector (hub) designated to mate with a male connector ( nozzle ) of a piston syringe consisting of a calibrated hollow barrel and a movable plunger.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the acceptance criteria and study for the Shifeng Piston Syringe with or without needle:

    Summary of Device Acceptance Criteria and Performance

    The Shifeng Disposable Syringe with or without needle demonstrates substantial equivalence to a predicate device (IMC Piston Syringe with Hypodermic Lumen Needle, K102969) by meeting various performance standards outlined in ISO 7886-1:1993/Cor. 1: 1995 and ISO 10993 for biocompatibility and ISO 11135 for sterilization.

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Acceptance Criteria (ISO Standard/Aspect)Reported Device Performance (Compliance/Details)
    ISO 7886-1:1993/Cor. 1: 1995 (General)
    Cleanliness (Clause 5)Tests performed according to standard
    Limits for acidity or alkalinity (Clause 6)Tests performed according to standard
    Limits for extractable metals (Clause 7)Tests performed according to standard
    Lubricant (Clause 8)Tests performed according to standard
    Tolerance on graduated capacity (Clause 9)Tests performed according to standard
    Scale (Clause 10.1)Tests performed according to standard
    Numbering of scale (Clause 10.2)Tests performed according to standard
    Overall length of scale to nominal capacity line (Clause 10.3)Tests performed according to standard
    Position of scale (Clause 10.4)Tests performed according to standard
    Dimensions (Clause 11.1)Complying with ISO 7886-1
    Finger grips (Clause 11.2)Tests performed according to standard
    Design (Clause 12.1)Tests performed according to standard
    Fit of piston in barrel (Clause 12.2)Tests performed according to standard
    Fiducial line (Clause 12.3)Tests performed according to standard
    Conical fitting (Clause 13.1)Tests performed according to standard
    Position of nozzle on end of barrel (Clause 13.2)Tests performed according to standard
    Nozzle lumen (Clause 13.3)Tests performed according to standard
    Dead space (Clause 14.1)Tests performed according to standard
    Freedom from air and liquid leakage past piston (Clause 14.2)Tests performed according to standard
    Primary container (Clause 15.1)Tests performed according to standard
    Secondary container (Clause 15.2)Tests performed according to standard
    Storage container (Clause 16.3)Tests performed according to standard
    Transport wrapping (Clause 16.4)Tests performed according to standard
    Barrel Diameter1ml: 4.65-4.70mm; 2ml: 8.85-8.90mm; 3ml: 9.00-9.05mm; 5ml: 12.40-12.45mm; 10ml: 14.95-15.00mm (Similar to predicate)
    Barrel Marking SpecsComplying with ISO7886-1
    Gradations legibilityLegible
    Lubricant amount / cm2Not exceed 0.25mg
    Barrel TransparencyTransparent
    Delivery AccuracyComplying with ISO 7886-1, 10.1 ~10.4
    Reuse DurabilityNot applicable, single use device
    LabelingComplying with ISO7886-1: 1993
    ISO 10993 (Biocompatibility)
    BiocompatibilityComplying with ISO 10993 (blood contacting materials are biocompatible)
    Ethylene Oxide Residual LevelsNot exceed maximum daily dose levels proposed (1.501ug/device for Lot 20100301; 10.9ug/device for Lot 20110926)
    Ethylene Chlorohydrin (ECH) Residual Levels10.9ug/device (Lot 20110926)
    ISO 11135 (Sterilization)
    SterilizationETO, ISO 11135 compliance
    Sterility Assurance Level (SAL)10^-6 (validated according to ISO 11135-1:2007 to provide SAL of 10^-8 mentioned, but typically 10^-6 for devices)

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    The provided text does not explicitly state the sample size used for the various tests conducted. It only lists the test items performed in accordance with the specified ISO standards.

    The data provenance is retrospective, as the tests were performed on the device "manufactured by Chengdu Xinjin Shifeng Medical Apparatus & Instrument Co., Ltd., China," implying that the devices already existed. The manufacturer is based in China.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

    This information is not provided in the document. The testing appears to be based on adherence to international standards (ISO), which typically involve standardized test methods rather than expert consensus on a "ground truth" for each specific test item in the way one might see for diagnostic image interpretation.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    This information is not provided. Given that the tests are based on ISO standards with specific pass/fail criteria, an adjudication method for reconciling expert disagreements is unlikely to be relevant in the traditional sense. The results would be objectively measured against the standard's requirements.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, and the Effect Size

    No, a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done. This device is a piston syringe, a physical medical instrument, and not a diagnostic AI system where human reader performance (with or without AI assistance) would be a relevant metric.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

    No, a standalone (algorithm only) performance study was not done. This device is a physical instrument, not an algorithm or AI. The performance refers to its physical and material properties, rather than algorithmic output.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    The "ground truth" for the performance tests conducted on the Shifeng Disposable Syringe is based on established international standards (ISO 7886-1, ISO 10993, ISO 11135). This means that the device's physical properties and functionalities are measured against the predefined specifications and acceptable ranges set forth by these standards. It's not "expert consensus" in the diagnostic sense, nor pathology or outcomes data, but rather objective compliance with engineering and quality standards.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    The concept of a "training set" is not applicable to this device. This is a physical, non-AI medical device; therefore, there is no algorithm or model that requires a training set.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    As there is no training set for this physical device, this question is not applicable.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1