Search Results

This product is intended for non-invasive lipolysis of the abdomen, flanks, back, and thighs in individuals with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or less. The device is intended to affect the appearance of visible fat bulges in the abdomen, flanks, back, and thighs.

The BL-A10 is a 1060nm Diode Hyperthermic Laser Lipolysis system and is the latest technology for non-invasive body contouring. It applies a 1060nm wavelength laser to target the adipose tissue to reduce fat in areas such as flank and abdomen. The purpose of the device is to breakdown the fat cells in the target area and in doing so contour the body and reduce the number of fat cells in that area. It is designed to meet international safety and performance standards.

The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the "Diode Laser Body Sculpture Systems," a medical device intended for non-invasive lipolysis. While it details the device and its equivalence to a predicate device, it explicitly states, "Clinical Testing: It is not applicable."

Therefore, I cannot provide information on acceptance criteria or a study that proves the device meets those criteria from this document. The manufacturer has determined that clinical testing is not necessary to demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate device for this submission.

The document discusses non-clinical testing, including electrical safety, electromagnetic compatibility, and biocompatibility, but these do not involve proving the device meets specific performance criteria for its intended clinical effect through human trials.

To summarize, for your specific request:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: Not provided in the document as clinical testing was deemed "not applicable."
2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable (this device is a physical laser system, not an AI diagnostic tool).
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc): Not applicable.
8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

The document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to an existing legally marketed device (SculpSure K182741) based on similar indications for use, technological characteristics (laser type, wavelength, lipolysis method), and compliance with electrical safety and biocompatibility standards.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Diode Laser Body Sculpture Systems is intended for non-invasive lipolysis of the abdomen, flanks, back, and thighs in individuals with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or less. The device is intended to affect the appearance of visible fat bulges in the abdomen, flanks, back, and thighs.

The HS-851 Diode Laser Body Sculpture Systems is a 1060nm Diode Hyperthermic Laser Lipolysis system and utilizes the latest technology for non-invasive body contouring. It applies a 1060nm wavelength laser to target the adipose tissue to reduce stubborn fat in areas such as flank, abdomen, back and thighs. The purpose of the device is to breakdown the fat cells in the target area and in doing so contour the body and reduce the number of fat cells in that area. The proposed device consists of the main unit, control unit with dedicated software and user interface, and the treatment applicators.

The provided text is a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device called the "Diode Laser Body Sculpture Systems." This document outlines the device's indications for use, its comparison to predicate devices, and the non-clinical testing performed. It explicitly states that clinical testing was not applicable. Therefore, the document does not contain information about the acceptance criteria or a study that proves the device meets those criteria in a clinical setting.

The response to your request will reflect the absence of this information from the provided document.

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance Study

As per the provided 510(k) summary (K201731), clinical testing for the Diode Laser Body Sculpture Systems was stated as "not applicable." Therefore, the document does not contain information regarding:

• A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance based on clinical outcomes.
• Sample sizes used for a clinical test set.
• Data provenance (country of origin, retrospective/prospective) for a clinical test set.
• Number of experts and their qualifications used to establish ground truth for a clinical test set.
• Adjudication method for a clinical test set.
• Multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study results.
• Standalone (algorithm only) performance study.
• Type of ground truth used for performance evaluation (beyond non-clinical safety and performance).
• Sample size for the training set for a clinical performance study.
• How ground truth for a training set was established for clinical performance.

The non-clinical testing primarily focused on electrical safety, electromagnetic compatibility, and biocompatibility to demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than establishing clinical efficacy or specific acceptance criteria related to fat reduction outcomes through a clinical study.

Summary of Non-Clinical Testing (as provided):

Note: The FDA 510(k) clearance is based on substantial equivalence to predicate devices, which may or may not require new clinical studies if the technological characteristics and indications for use are sufficiently similar and safety/effectiveness can be demonstrated through non-clinical data and comparison to existing devices. In this case, the statement "It is not applicable" for clinical testing indicates that the manufacturer relied on other means (likely benchmarking against predicate devices with established clinical profiles and robust non-clinical data) to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

Ask a specific question about this device

The DERMASCULPT is intended for Dermatological procedures requiring incision, excision, coagulation and vaporization of soft tissue. The specific indications using the applicable handpieces are as follows: Skin resurfacing in the treatment of wrinkles and scar revision (including acne scars) with the non-fractionated handpiece. Removal of cutaneous skin lesions with the micron tip handpieces including epidermal nevi, actinic chellitis, keloids, verrucae, skin tags, anal tags, keratosis, scar revision, (including acne scars), benign tumors and cysts, superficial skin lesions and diagnostic biopsies. The DERMASCULPT with the fractionated scanner handpiece is intended/indicated for Dermatological procedures requiring coagulation of soft tissue and skin resurfacing.

The DermaSCULPT Er:YAG Laser System [DermaSCULPT] unit and controls are contained in a single console. Electrical power is supplied to the console by the facility's power source. The laser energy produced within the device is delivered to the tissue by means of Fiber Delivery System and specially designed Scanner, Handpieces, Tips and Adaptors. The user activates laser emission by means of a footswitch. The lamp power supply causes the flash lamp to light, causing the emission of an invisible infrared Er:YAG laser beam (2.94 microns). A visible white light pulsed beam from the flashlamp is used as an aiming beam. The laser beam passes through a partially reflecting mirror and then passes through the energy monitor, after which its power is measured. When all the pre-conditions have been satisfied and the READY button is pressed and the foot switch is depressed, the safety shutter opens and the laser beam is allowed into the delivery unit coupler. The electrical system is comprised of the laser power supply, the control unit, calibrator, control panel, key switch, emergency stop switch, and foot switch. The components of the laser power supply include a high voltage power supply and a high voltage trigger control board. The high voltage power supply uses the high voltage to illuminate the flashlamp. The control unit comprises a microprocessor board, accessory board and other components that it controls. The calibrator measures the transmittance of the fiber delivery unit. The handheld scanner module is an attachment to the fiber.

The provided text describes the DermaSCULPT Er:YAG Laser System, its intended use, and its comparison to predicate devices, but it does not contain details about a study that establishes acceptance criteria or proves the device meets those criteria with specific performance metrics.

The document is a 510(k) summary for a medical device which typically focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, rather than detailed performance studies with acceptance criteria in the way you've described for AI/algorithm performance.

Therefore, I cannot provide the information requested in your bullet points as the provided document does not contain it. The "Nonclinical Performance Data" section states: "The review of the technical characteristics, indications for use, mechanism of action, and verification and validation information provided demonstrate that the DermaSculpt is substantially equivalent to its predicate device." and "Clinical Performance Data" states: "HOYA ConBio has established that the DermaSculpt performs as clinically intended and that no new issues of safety and effectiveness are introduced." These statements indicate that performance was reviewed for substantial equivalence, but they do not provide specific acceptance criteria or study results in the format you've requested.

If you have a document that describes specific studies with acceptance criteria for an AI/algorithm-based device, please provide that text.

Ask a specific question about this device

Sculpture Plus Nano-Hybrid Composite is an indirect or direct/indirect dental restorative material. It is indicated for use, in cured form, to restore carious lesions or structural defects or lost tooth structure either by itself or in combination of metal/ceramic/polymeric substrates and conditioners such as bonding, luting, etching agents commonly used in tooth restoration. The curing can be processed using photo and/or heat curing devices. The curing can accomplished in air, under vacuum or under pressure without or with inert atmosphere.

Sculpture Plus Nano-Hybrid Composite is an indirect or direct/indirect dental restorative material.

I am sorry, but based on the provided text, there is no information about acceptance criteria, a study proving device performance, sample sizes, data provenance, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, ground truth types, or training set details.

The document is a 510(k) summary for a dental restorative material, Sculpture Plus Nano-Hybrid Composite, stating its substantial equivalence to a predicate device. It focuses on regulatory approval based on equivalence, not on performance studies with specific acceptance criteria as you've outlined.

Ask a specific question about this device

Ask a specific question about this device

The SCULPTURE is designed for use in fragmentation, emulsification and aspiration of soft ussue in the following Surgical Specialties: plastic and reconstructive surgery, general surgery

Not Found

This appears to be a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a device called "Sculpture." The letter confirms that SMEI, Inc. can market the device because it has been determined to be substantially equivalent to devices marketed prior to May 28, 1976.

However, the provided text does not contain any information regarding acceptance criteria, device performance, study details, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, or expert qualifications. This document is a regulatory approval letter, not a clinical study report.

Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information from the given text. To answer your questions, I would need access to the actual 510(k) submission document or a clinical study report for the Sculpture device.

Ask a specific question about this device