Search Results

The Prelude Small O.D. Introducer Guide Wire is intended to facilitate the placement of introducer sheaths during diagnostic and interventional procedures.
The Prelude Small O.D. Introducer Guide Wire is indicated for use in the peripheral vasculature only.

The Prelude® Small O.D. Introducer Guide Wire is composed of a stainless-steel core wire inside a stainless-steel coil. The guide wire is welded at the distal and proximal tips and has a polished weld finish. The stainless-steel construction provides radiopacity and visibility to the user under X-ray. The wires are available in outer diameters 0.018", 0.021" and 0.025", lengths from 45 cm to 80 cm, straight and double-ended J 3mm / straight tip shapes, Standard and Firm body wire stiffness profiles, with a flexible atraumatic tip.

The provided text is a 510(k) summary for a medical device called the "Prelude Small O.D. Introducer Guide Wire." It details the device's characteristics, intended use, and a comparison to a predicate device, along with a list of non-clinical performance and biocompatibility tests conducted.

However, the request asks for specific information regarding acceptance criteria and a study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria, particularly in the context of an AI-powered device or a study involving human readers and AI assistance.

The provided document does not describe an AI-powered device, a study involving human readers, a test set with expert ground truth, or an MRMC comparative effectiveness study. The tests listed are for a physical medical guide wire, focusing on its mechanical properties, material integrity, and biocompatibility.

Therefore, I cannot fulfill the request for information on acceptance criteria and study proving device meets the criteria for an AI device or a study involving human readers and AI assistance, as the provided text pertains to a traditional, non-AI medical device.

Here's a breakdown of why I cannot answer the specific questions based on the provided text:

• 1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: While the document states "The subject Prelude Small O.D. Introducer Guide Wire met the predetermined acceptance criteria," it does not list the specific numerical or qualitative acceptance criteria for each test (e.g., "Tensile strength must be >X Newtons"). It also does not report the exact performance results (e.g., "Tensile strength was Y Newtons"). It only confirms that the criteria were met.
• 2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable. The "test set" here refers to the physical guide wires tested, not a dataset of images or clinical cases. Sample sizes for each mechanical and biocompatibility test are not provided. Data provenance (country of origin, retrospective/prospective) is irrelevant for this type of device testing.
• 3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth... and qualifications: Not applicable. Ground truth as typically defined for AI/imaging studies (e.g., expert radiological reads) is not relevant for the physical testing of a guide wire.
• 4. Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable. There's no "adjudication" for mechanical and biocompatibility tests in the way there would be for expert interpretations of medical images.
• 5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done... effect size: Not applicable. This type of study involves human readers interpreting medical images, usually with and without AI assistance. The device in question is a physical guide wire, not an AI algorithm for imaging.
• 6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done: Not applicable. The device is not an algorithm.
• 7. The type of ground truth used: Not applicable. Ground truth in the context of AI/imaging studies (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data) is not relevant here. The "ground truth" for this device's performance is derived from standardized physical and chemical tests (e.g., measuring tensile strength against a specification).
• 8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. This device does not involve a training set as it's not an AI model.
• 9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable, as there's no training set.

In summary, the provided document is for a conventional medical device (a guide wire) and does not contain the information requested regarding AI device performance studies.

Ask a specific question about this device