Search Results
Found 3 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(87 days)
Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay
The Panther Fusion® SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay is a fully automated multiplexed real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in vitro diagnostic test intended for the qualitative detection and differentiation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), influenza A virus (Flu A), influenza B virus (Flu B), and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Nucleic acids are isolated and purified from nasopharyngeal (NP) swab specimens and anterior nasal (AN) swab specimens obtained from individuals exhibiting signs and symptoms of a respiratory tract infection. Clinical signs and symptoms of respiratory viral infection due to SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and RSV can be similar. This assay is intended to aid in the differential diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, Flu A, Flu B, and RSV infections in humans and is not intended to detect influenza C virus infections.
Nucleic acids from the viral organisms identified by this test are generally detectable in NP and AN swab specimens during the acute phase of infection and identification of specific viral nucleic acids from individuals exhibiting signs and symptoms of respiratory tract infective of the presence of the identified virus and aids in diagnosis if used in conjunction with other clinical and epidemiological information, and laboratory findings. The results of this test should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis, treatment, or other patient management decisions.
Positive results do not rule out coinfection with other organism(s) detected by the Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay may not be the definite cause of disease. Negative results do not preclude SARS-CoV-2, influenza A virus, influenza B virus, or RSV infections. This assay is designed for use on the Panther Fusion system.
The Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay is classified as a Class II in vitro diagnostic device per 21 CFR 866.3981 and has product code QOF. The Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay is designed for use on the fully automated Panther Fusion System.
The Panther Fusion system is a class II exempt device under 21CFR 862.2570 that has product code OOI.
The Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay is a multiplex real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) in vitro diagnostic test developed for use on the fully automated Panther Fusion system to detect and differentiate SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, influenza B, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) directly from nasopharyngeal and anterior nasal swab specimens, from individuals exhibiting signs and symptoms of a respiratory tract infection.
The Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay involves the following steps: sample lysis, nucleic acid capture and elution transfer, and multiplex RT-PCR where analytes (when present) are simultaneously amplified, detected and differentiated. Nucleic acid capture and elution takes place in a single tube on the Panther Fusion system. The eluate is transferred to the Panther Fusion system reaction tube containing the assay reagents. Multiplex RT-PCR is then performed for the eluted nucleic acid on the Panther Fusion system.
Sample lysis, nucleic acid capture, and elution: Prior to processing and testing on the Panther Fusion system, specimens are transferred to a Specimen Lysis Tube containing specimen transport media (STM). Alternatively, samples can be collected with the RespDirect Collection kit which contains enhanced specimen transport media (eSTM). STM and eSTM lyse the cells, release target nucleic acid and protect them from degradation during storage. The Internal Control-S (IC-S) is added to each test specimen and controls via the working Panther Fusion Capture Reagent-S (wFCR-S). The IC-S is the reagent used to monitor specimen processing, amplification and detection. Magnetic particles with covalently bound oligonucleotides mediate the nucleic acid capture. Capture oligonucleotides hybridize to nucleic acid in the test specimen. Hybridized nucleic acid is then separated from the lysed specimen in a magnetic field. Wash steps remove extraneous components from the reaction tube. The elution step elutes purified nucleic acid. During the nucleic acid capture and elution step, total nucleic acid is isolated from specimens.
Elution transfer and RT-PCR: During the elution transfer step, eluted nucleic acid is transferred to a Panther Fusion tube already containing oil and reconstituted mastermix. Target amplification occurs via RT-PCR. A reverse transcriptase generates a DNA copy of the target sequence. Target specific forward and reverse primers and probes then amplify targets while simultaneously detecting and discriminating multiple target types via multiplex RT-PCR. The Panther Fusion system compares the fluorescence signal to a predetermined cut-off to produce a qualitative result for the presence or absence of the analyte. The positive result for each analyte will be accompanied by the cycle threshold (Ct value).
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and the study details for the Hologic Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay, based on the provided document:
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance
The document describes the performance of the Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay in detecting SARS-CoV-2, Flu A, Flu B, and RSV in prospectively collected Anterior Nasal (AN) swab specimens in RespDirect eSTM.
Table of Acceptance Criteria (Implicit) and Reported Device Performance
While explicit acceptance criteria (e.g., minimum PPA/NPA values) are not stated, the document presents the observed Positive Percent Agreement (PPA) and Negative Percent Agreement (NPA) with their 95% Confidence Intervals. These values are implicitly the performance targets for the assay.
Target Virus | Prevalence (%) | PPA (% (95% CI)) | NPA (% (95% CI)) |
---|---|---|---|
Prospective Study (n=1021 evaluable AN swab specimens) | |||
SARS-CoV-2 | 10.8 | 99.1 (95.0, 99.8) | 99.0 (98.1, 99.5) |
Flu A | 1.1 | 100 (74.1-100) | 99.9 (99.4, 100) |
Flu B | 0.6 | 83.3 (43.6, 97.0) | 99.8 (99.3, 99.9) |
RSV | 0.1 | 100 (20.7, 100) | 99.9 (99.4, 100) |
Enrichment Study (n=205 evaluable AN swab specimens) | |||
Flu A | N/A | 97.2 (90.3-99.2) | 93.2 (87.6-96.4) |
Flu B | N/A | 97.8 (88.4-99.6) | 99.4 (96.5-99.9) |
RSV | N/A | 98.4 (91.3-99.7) | 95.8 (91.2-98.1) |
Study Information
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Prospective Study:
- Sample Size: 1021 evaluable anterior nasal (AN) swab specimens.
- Data Provenance: Prospective, multicenter study conducted in the US between January 2023 and May 2023 at nine participating medical facilities.
- Enrichment Study (Supplemental Clinical Data for Low Prevalence Analytes):
- Sample Size: 205 evaluable anterior nasal (AN) swab specimens.
- Data Provenance: Enrichment phase of the study, conducted in the US between October 2023 and February 2024 at six participating medical facilities. The specimens were from individuals with a positive standard of care (SOC) test result for Flu A, Flu B, and/or RSV. All were frozen prior to testing.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
The document does not specify the number or qualifications of experts used to establish the ground truth. Instead, it refers to:
- For SARS-CoV-2: A composite comparator algorithm (CCA) consisting of up to three highly sensitive US FDA EUA SARS-CoV-2 molecular tests.
- For Flu A, Flu B, and RSV: A US FDA-cleared molecular Flu A/B/RSV assay (in the prospective study) and a U.S. FDA-cleared molecular Flu A/B/RSV assay (in the enrichment study).
- For the enrichment study, initial selection was based on a positive standard of care (SOC) test result for Flu A, Flu B, and/or RSV.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
- For SARS-CoV-2 in the prospective study: A Composite Comparator Algorithm (CCA) was used. A final CCA result was assigned when two of the three composite comparator assays were in concordance.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done
No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study involving human readers and AI assistance was not done. This study is for an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) assay (a molecular test), not an AI-powered diagnostic imaging device.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done
Yes, this study represents a standalone performance evaluation of the Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay. The assay itself is an automated molecular diagnostic test on the Panther Fusion system, and its performance was evaluated against comparator methods (other molecular tests or algorithms), not against human interpretation of its outputs in a clinical setting for diagnostic aid.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
- SARS-CoV-2: Composite comparator algorithm (CCA) based on multiple FDA EUA molecular tests.
- Flu A/B/RSV: US FDA-cleared molecular Flu A/B/RSV assay.
- Enrichment Study (Flu A/B/RSV): US FDA-cleared molecular Flu A/B/RSV assay, and initial selection based on positive Standard of Care (SOC) test results.
This represents a reference standard method ground truth, where another established diagnostic test is used as the benchmark.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
The document does not provide information on a specific "training set" sample size for algorithm development. The Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay is a real-time RT-PCR in vitro diagnostic test, not a machine learning or AI algorithm in the context of typical training/validation splits. Its development would involve analytical studies and design verification, but not typically a "training set" in the same sense as an AI model. The provided clinical data are for performance evaluation.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
As noted in point 8, the concept of a "training set" with established ground truth in the context of AI models is not directly applicable here. The assay's performance characteristics (e.g., limit of detection, analytical reactivity) are established through various analytical studies (bench studies), not through a "training set" with a clinical ground truth. The clinical studies described are for validation and performance assessment, not for training an algorithm.
Ask a specific question about this device
(76 days)
Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV Assay
The Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay is a fully automated multiplexed real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in vitro diagnostic test intended for the qualitative detection and differentiation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), influenza A virus (Flu A), influenza B virus (Flu B), and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Nucleic acids are isolated and purified from nasopharyngeal (NP) swab specimens and anterior nasal (AN) swab specimens obtained from individuals exhibiting signs and symptoms of a respiratory tract infection. Clinical signs and symptoms of respiratory viral infection due to SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and RSV can be similar. This assay is intended to aid in the differential diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, Flu A, Flu B, and RSV infections in humans and is not intended to detect influenza C virus infections.
Nucleic acids from the viral organisms identified by this test are generally detectable in NP and AN swab specimens during the acute phase of infection and identification of specific viral nucleic acids from individuals exhibiting signs and symptoms of respiratory tract infective of the presence of the identified virus and aids in diagnosis if used in conjunction with other clinical and epidemiological information, and laboratory findings. The results of this test should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis, treatment, or other patient management decisions. Positive results do not rule out coinfection with other organism(s) detected by the Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay may not be the definite cause of disease. Negative results do not preclude SARS-CoV-2, influenza A virus, influenza B virus, or RSV infections. This assay is designed for use on the Panther Fusion system.
The Hologic RespDirect Collection Kit is cleared for NP swab specimens only for testing with the Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay.
The Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay is classified as a Class II in vitro diagnostic device per 21 CFR 866.3981 and has product code QOF. The Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay is designed for use on the fully automated Panther Fusion System.
The Panther Fusion system is a class II exempt device under 21CFR 862.2570 that has product code OOI.
The Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay is a multiplex real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) in vitro diagnostic test developed for use on the fully automated Panther Fusion system to detect and differentiate SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, influenza B, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) directly from nasopharyngeal and anterior nasal swab specimens, from individuals exhibiting signs and symptoms of a respiratory tract infection.
The Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay involves the following steps: sample lysis, nucleic acid capture and elution transfer, and multiplex RT-PCR where analytes (when present) are simultaneously amplified, detected and differentiated. Nucleic acid capture and elution takes place in a single tube on the Panther Fusion system. The eluate is transferred to the Panther Fusion system reaction tube containing the assay reagents. Multiplex RT-PCR is then performed for the eluted nucleic acid on the Panther Fusion system.
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and the study details for the Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay, based on the provided document:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Target Virus | Acceptance Criteria (Implicit for New Specimen Type) | Reported Performance (Prospective AN Swab) PPA % (95% CI) [n/N] | Reported Performance (Prospective AN Swab) NPA % (95% CI) [n/N] | Reported Performance (Retrospective AN Swab) PPA % (95% CI) [n/N] | Reported Performance (Retrospective AN Swab) NPA % (95% CI) [n/N] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARS-CoV-2 | Comparable to predicate device; high PPA/NPA expected for molecular tests. | 94.8 (90.1, 97.3) [146/154] | 98.8 (98.0, 99.3) [1023/1035] | N/A (Not reported separately) | N/A (Not reported separately) |
Flu A | Comparable to predicate device; high PPA/NPA expected for molecular tests. | 91.8 (80.8, 96.8) [45/49] | 99.6 (99.0, 99.8) [1135/1140] | 97.9 (89.1, 99.6) [47/48] | 98.4 (94.4, 99.6) [123/125] |
Flu B | Comparable to predicate device; high PPA/NPA expected for molecular tests. | 66.7 (20.8, 93.9) [2/3] | 99.7 (99.3, 99.9) [1183/1186] | 97.2 (90.3, 99.2) [69/71] | 100 (96.4, 100) [102/102] |
RSV | Comparable to predicate device; high PPA/NPA expected for molecular tests. | 94.4 (74.2, 99.0) [17/18] | 99.8 (99.4, 100) [1169/1171] | 98.0 (89.5, 99.6) [49/50] | 99.2 (95.5, 99.9) [122/123] |
Note on Acceptance Criteria: The document explicitly states the goal is to demonstrate "comparable" performance to the predicate device (which uses an NP swab) for the new anterior nasal (AN) swab specimen type. While specific numerical acceptance criteria (e.g., "PPA must be >X%") are not provided in this summary, the reported performance metrics (PPA, NPA, and their confidence intervals) are presented to demonstrate this comparability and overall effectiveness for diagnostic use, as typical for molecular assays expanding their indications. The high NPA values for all targets indicate good specificity, and generally high PPA values indicate good sensitivity, especially when considering the confidence intervals. The lower PPA for Flu B in the prospective study was addressed and supported by the retrospective study, which showed strong performance.
2. Sample Sizes Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
-
Prospective Clinical Study (Anterior Nasal Swab):
- Sample Size: 1,268 individuals were enrolled. 1,230 AN swab specimens were tested, resulting in 1,189 evaluable specimens for analysis (not all evaluable for all analytes).
- Data Provenance: Prospective, multicenter study conducted in the US. Specimens were collected from individuals attending nine participating medical facilities in the US during the 2022-2023 respiratory infection season.
-
Retrospective Clinical Study (Anterior Nasal Swab - Supplement for Flu B and RSV):
- Sample Size: 175 preselected retrospective specimens.
- Data Provenance: Retrospective. The origin country is not explicitly stated but is implied to be related to the US context from the prospective study.
-
Analytical Studies (Reprocessing from K222736):
- Sample Size: Not explicitly stated as "sample size" for each analytical study detail, but refers to the number of replicates/conditions tested for LOD, inclusivity, exclusivity, etc. For example, Flu B LoD confirmation involved 28 replicates per panel.
- Data Provenance: Already existing data from the previous 510(k) submission (K222736) using Nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs, reprocessed with the updated software.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications
The document does not mention the use of experts to establish ground truth for the clinical test sets. Instead, the ground truth was established by comparing the candidate device's results to reference molecular assays:
- SARS-CoV-2: A composite comparator algorithm (CCA) consisting of up to three highly sensitive US FDA EUA SARS-CoV-2 molecular tests. A final CCA result was assigned when two of the three comparator assays were in concordance.
- Flu A, Flu B, and RSV: A US FDA-cleared molecular Flu A/B/RSV assay.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
- SARS-CoV-2 Ground Truth: For SARS-CoV-2, a composite comparator algorithm (CCA) was used. A final CCA result was assigned when "two of the three composite comparator assays were in concordance." This effectively acts as an adjudication method where agreement among a majority of reference tests determines the ground truth.
- Flu A, Flu B, RSV Ground Truth: For Flu A, Flu B, and RSV, a single "US FDA-cleared molecular Flu A/B/RSV assay" was used as the comparator method. There's no mention of an adjudication process among multiple comparators for these targets.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
- No, a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not explicitly mentioned or conducted. This type of study is more common for imaging devices or diagnostics that involve subjective interpretation by human readers. This device is an automated molecular diagnostic assay, where the output is objective (positive/negative, Ct value).
6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance Study
- Yes, the performance data presented (PPA, NPA) directly reflects the standalone performance of the Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay. It is compared to a ground truth established by other molecular tests, without human interpretation of the assay's output influencing the performance metrics. The assay itself is automated, so its performance is inherently "algorithm only" in the context of generating results.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
- Molecular Comparator Assays: The ground truth for the clinical test sets (both prospective and retrospective) was established using other legally marketed and highly sensitive molecular diagnostic tests.
- For SARS-CoV-2: A composite of up to three US FDA EUA SARS-CoV-2 molecular tests.
- For Flu A, Flu B, RSV: A US FDA-cleared molecular Flu A/B/RSV assay.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
- The document does not explicitly state the sample size used for the training set. This submission focuses on the validation of an existing assay with a new specimen type (anterior nasal swab) and a software update (Adaptive Crosstalk Correction). The original development and training data for the core assay (K222736) would have been described in that prior submission, but are not detailed here for this specific submission's scope. The mention of "reprocessed with validated Results Processor Tool" for previously submitted analytical studies also suggests reuse of data rather than new training.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
- Since the document doesn't explicitly detail a new "training set" for this specific submission, it also doesn't describe how ground truth for such a set was established. It's likely that the original assay development followed similar methods of using well-characterized samples or comparator assays for internal development and optimization.
- Regarding the Adaptive Crosstalk Correction (ACC) factor, the validation involved "testing of SARS-CoV-2 positive clinical specimens that are representative of those that yielded false positive Flu B results in the field." This indicates that the problem the ACC addresses arose from real-world performance, and the resolution was validated against specific clinical scenarios rather than a formal "training set" in the machine learning sense.
Ask a specific question about this device
(249 days)
Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV Assay
The Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay is a fully automated multiplexed real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in viro diagnostic test intended for the qualitative detection and differentiation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), influenza A virus (Flu A), influenza B virus (Flu B), and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Nucleic acids are isolated and purified from nasopharyngeal (NP) specimens obtained from individuals exhibiting signs and symptoms of a respiratory tract infection. Clinical signs and symptoms of respiratory viral infection due to SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and RSV can be similar. This assay is intended to aid in the differential diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, Flu A, Flu B, and RSV infections in humans and is not intended to detect influenza C virus infections.
Nucleic acids from the viral organisms identified by this test are generally detectable in NP specimens during the acute phase of infection. The detection and identification of specific viral nucleic acids from individuals exhibiting signs and symptoms of respiratory tract infection are indicative of the identified virus and aids in diagnosis if used in conjunction with other clinical and epidemiological information, and laboratory findings. The results of this test should not be used as for diagnosis, treatment, or other patient management decisions.
Positive results do not rule out coinfection with other organism(s) detected by the Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay may not be the definite cause of disease.
Negative results do not preclude SARS-CoV-2, influenza A virus, influenza B virus, or RSV infections. This assay is designed for use on the Panther Fusion system.
The Hologic RespDirect Collection Kit can be used to collect NP specimens for testing with the Panther Fusion
The Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay is a multiplex real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) in vitro diagnostic test developed for use on the fully automated Panther Fusion system to detect and differentiate SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, influenza B, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) directly from nasopharyngeal (NP) swab specimens collected into UTM/VTM or with the Hologic RespDirect Collection Kit, from individuals exhibiting signs and symptoms of a respiratory tract infection.
The Hologic RespDirect Collection Kit is intended for the collection of NP swab specimens. Each individual collection kit is comprised of a single flocked NP swab and an enhanced Direct Load Tube (eDLT) containing 2.9mL of enhanced Specimen Transport Media (eSTM) which are flow wrapped together for customer convenience.
The Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV assay involves the following steps: a) Sample lysis; b) Nucleic acid capture and elution; c) Elution transfer and multiplex RT-PCR.
The Panther Fusion system integrates Hologic's commercialized Panther instrument system with an add-on sidecar, the Panther Fusion module, which extends the functionality of the Panther system by increasing the assay processing capabilities to include real-time PCR (RT-PCR). The Panther Fusion module includes instrument hardware and can be installed on existing Panther instruments or ordered with new Panther instruments.
The Panther Fusion system employs non-specific target capture (NSTC) for the purification of RNA and DNA from the sample, followed by nucleic acid amplification and real-time fluorescent detection. The process involves sample loading and preparation (i.e. nucleic acid extraction) on the Panther instrument using similar workflow and processing steps as for other commercialized Hologic Aptima TMA assays. The extracted nucleic acid for each sample is transferred to the Panther Fusion module where PCR amplification and detection occurs.
The information provided in the document refers to a Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2/Flu A/B/RSV Assay, which is an in vitro diagnostic test for the qualitative detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A virus (Flu A), influenza B virus (Flu B), and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). This is a laboratory diagnostic device, not an AI/ML-enabled device for medical imaging analysis. Therefore, much of the requested information (e.g., number of experts, adjudication method, MRMC study, standalone performance for an algorithm, training set details) is not applicable to this type of device submission.
However, I can extract and structure the relevant acceptance criteria and performance data as presented for this diagnostic assay.
Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:
Since specific "acceptance criteria" for each performance metric are not explicitly stated in a single table, I will synthesize them from the descriptions of the studies. Performance is generally demonstrated by achieving high Positive Percent Agreement (PPA) and Negative Percent Agreement (NPA) with comparator methods, or by demonstrating acceptable analytical performance (LoD, cross-reactivity, precision, etc.).
Criterion (Implicit from Study Design) | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|
Clinical Performance (Prospective Study): | |
- SARS-CoV-2 PPA | Overall: 96.9% (95% CI: 94.7-98.2) |
- SARS-CoV-2 NPA | Overall: 98.5% (95% CI: 97.7-99.0) |
- Flu A PPA | Overall: 98.4% (95% CI: 94.3-99.6) |
- Flu A NPA | Overall: 99.7% (95% CI: 99.3-99.9) |
- Flu B PPA | Overall: Not calculable (0/0 positive cases) |
- Flu B NPA | Overall: 99.8% (95% CI: 99.4-99.9) |
- RSV PPA | Overall: 84.6% (95% CI: 57.8-95.7) |
- RSV NPA | Overall: 100% (95% CI: 99.8-100) |
Clinical Performance (Retrospective Study): | |
- Flu A PPA | 93.1% (95% CI: 78.0-98.1) |
- Flu B PPA | 95.5% (95% CI: 78.2-99.2) |
- RSV PPA | 100% (95% CI: 92.4-100) |
- Flu A NPA (Confirmed Negative) | 100% (95% CI: 94.5-100) |
- Flu B NPA (Confirmed Negative) | 100% (95% CI: 95.0-100) |
- RSV NPA (Confirmed Negative) | 100% (95% CI: 92.6-100) |
Analytical Sensitivity (LoD): | Defined as lowest concentration at which >95% of all replicates tested positive. Specific LoD values per viral strain are provided in Table 3. For example, SARS-CoV-2 USA-WA1/2020: 0.03 TCID50/mL; Flu A/Brisbane/02/18 (H1N1): 0.06 TCID50/mL. |
Reproducibility: | Agreement values were 100% for all panel member components, except: True negative (Flu B): 98.9% (one false positive). Flu A low positive: 98.9% (one false negative), indicating robustness. Total signal variability overall |
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1