Search Results

A powder-free patient examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.

A powder-free patient examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.

Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information for the "Powderfree Latex Examination Gloves" described in the provided documents:

The documents provided are a 510(k) Summary and an FDA substantially equivalent letter for "Powderfree Latex Examination Gloves" manufactured by PT. Maja Agung Latexindo. This type of regulatory filing demonstrates substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than proving performance against novel acceptance criteria through a full-fledged clinical study.

Therefore, the study design and "acceptance criteria" here refer to meeting established industry standards for similar devices and demonstrating equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

• Sample Size: Not explicitly stated in the provided documents. For physical property testing of gloves adhering to ASTM standards, specific sample sizes are typically defined within the ASTM standard (e.g., ASTM D3578-05ae2 for latex examination gloves specifies sampling plans for various tests like dimensions, physical properties, and watertightness).
• Data Provenance: The manufacturing location is "Jln. Utama No. 98 PUJI MULYO SUNGGAL - DELI SERDANG SUMATERA UTARA - INDONESIA". The testing data would originate from the manufacturer's quality control or third-party testing facilities related to their manufacturing process. The data is retrospective, as it refers to tests conducted on manufactured batches to ensure compliance with the standard.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

• This question is not applicable in the context of this 510(k) submission. The "ground truth" for the performance specifications of these gloves is defined by the ASTM D 3578-05ae2 Standard and FDA's pinhole requirements. These are engineering and performance specifications, not subjective expert interpretations of medical images or outcomes. The "experts" involved would be the engineers and quality control personnel who conducted the tests and verified compliance with the standard.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

• This is not applicable. Adjudication methods are typically for subjective assessments (e.g., medical image interpretation). The tests conducted for glove performance (tensile strength, elongation, dimensions, pinhole) are objective measurements against a defined standard.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, If So, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs Without AI Assistance

• Not applicable. This is not a study involving human readers or AI assistance. It is a device 510(k) submission for examination gloves, which are physical medical devices, not diagnostic software.

6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

• Not applicable. This is not an algorithm or software device.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

• The ground truth used is established industry standards and regulatory requirements, specifically:
  • ASTM D 3578-05ae2 Standard for Powder-Free Latex Examination Gloves
  • FDA pinhole requirement for examination gloves.
  • The specifications defined in the 510(k) summary for dimensions and physical properties, which are derived from or meet these standards.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

• Not applicable. There is no "training set" in the context of this device manufacturing and regulatory submission. The gloves are manufactured and tested against predefined specifications.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

• Not applicable, as there is no training set for this type of device. The specifications for performance (ground truth) were established over time through industry consensus and regulatory guidance, leading to standards like ASTM D 3578-05ae2.

Ask a specific question about this device

A patient examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.

Powder Free Latex Examination Gloves

This document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for "Powder Free Latex Exam Gloves, Non-Sterile with Protein Labeling Claim 50 Microgram or Less." It is a regulatory approval document and does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving device performance in the context of a statistical study with sample sizes, expert ground truth, or an MRMC study.

The letter explicitly states: "We have reviewed your Section 510(k) notification of intent to market the device referenced above and we have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976..."

This means the device's clearance is based on its substantial equivalence to a predicate device already on the market, not on a standalone performance study with specific acceptance criteria that are detailed in this document.

Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information from this document. The document primarily focuses on regulatory approval based on "substantial equivalence."

Ask a specific question about this device

A PATIENT EXAMINATION GLOVE IS A DISPOSABLE DEVICE INTENDED FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES THAT IS WORN ON THE EXAMINER'S HAND OR FINGER TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION BETWEEN PATIENT AND EXAMINER.

POWDER FREE LATEX EXAMINATION GLOVES, NON-STERILE

This document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for "Powder-Free Latex Examination Gloves, Non-Sterile". It does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving device performance as the request pertains to, but rather is a notification of substantial equivalence for a medical device.

Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information from the provided text.

Ask a specific question about this device