Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K221634
    Date Cleared
    2023-05-24

    (352 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    868.5925
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    Oxymag - Transport and Emergency Ventilator

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Oxymag is a controlled volume, pressure and time cycled emergency and transport ventilator. It is intended for use with infant, child, and adult patients with a tidal volume from 50 ml upwards who are in respiratory and/or cardiac arrest or respiratory distress and who require the ventilatory support.

    It is intended for pre-hospital and hospital use including intra-hospital, inter-hospital and transport settings.

    Device Description

    Oxymag provides a mixture of ambient air and oxygen at concentrations adjusted by the operator using the accurate oxygen concentration system using the venturi principle. O2 concentration is obtained through a galvanic cell by passing gas through the sensor. In addition, it performs the control of flows and pressures in the respiratory circuit to provide the ventilation modalities appropriate to the patient's condition.

    The associated accessories include:

    • Power outlet 12V/3,34A
    • AC cable
    • Disposable respiratory circuit
    • 02 extension
    • Environment filters
    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the Oxymag - Transport and Emergency Ventilator. It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device (O-two e700, K141595) rather than establishing novel performance acceptance criteria or conducting a comprehensive study to prove these criteria.

    Therefore, the document does not contain the specific information requested in most of your numbered points, as it's not a study designed to establish and prove acceptance criteria for a new device's performance in a clinical setting with human subjects. Instead, it describes bench testing, software verification, electrical safety, and biocompatibility to confirm the device operates as intended and is comparable to an already cleared device.

    Here's what can be extracted and what is missing:


    Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance (Based on Comparison to Predicate):

    The submission demonstrates substantial equivalence by comparing the Oxymag's parameters and features to those of the predicate device, e700. The "acceptance criteria" are implicitly that the Oxymag's performance is equivalent or does not raise new safety or effectiveness concerns compared to the predicate.

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

    Since this is a 510(k) summary, formal "acceptance criteria" for a study are not explicitly stated in the way one might find in a clinical trial protocol. Instead, the performance is demonstrated by comparison with a predicate device and through various forms of engineering and non-clinical testing.

    The provided "Table 1. Comparison table between the subject and predicate devices" serves as the primary evidence for this. Instead of a 'reported device performance' against a strict new acceptance criterion, it shows 'equivalence' or 'similarity' to the predicate.

    CharacteristicAcceptance Criteria (Implied: Equivalent/Similar to Predicate)Reported Device Performance (Oxymag)Discussion/Proof of Equivalence
    Indications for UseEquivalent to e700Controlled volume, pressure and time cycled emergency and transport ventilator for infant, child, and adult patients (tidal volume 50ml upwards) in respiratory/cardiac arrest or distress requiring ventilatory support. For pre-hospital and hospital use (intra-hospital, inter-hospital, transport settings).The indications for use are equivalent to e700.
    Patient PopulationEquivalent to e700Infant, child, and adult patientsThe patient population is equivalent to e700.
    Environment of UseEquivalent to e700Pre-hospital and hospital use including intra-hospital, inter-hospital and transport settings.The environment of use is equivalent to e700.
    Product CodeEquivalent to e700BTLThe product code is equivalent to e700.
    Ventilation ModesSimilar to e700VCV, PCV, V-SIMV, P-SIMV, CPAP/PSSimilar to e700. Except for CPR (not in Oxymag), other modes have different nomenclature but are equivalent (e.g., ACV = VCV/PCV, SIMV = V-SIMV, BiLVL = P-SIMV, CPAP is same).
    Breathing CircuitPerformance similar to e700Dual limb, unique for all patient typesDifferent from e700 (which is single limb). "Despite the difference, the performance of both devices is similar as demonstrated in bench test."
    Exhalation ValvePerformance similar to e700Connected to the equipment in the exhalation connector. Electronically controlled.Different from e700 (which has pneumatic control, valve in circuit). "Despite this difference, the exhalation for both devices is similar."
    WaveformsEquivalent to e700Volume-time, pressure-time and flow-timeWaveforms are equivalent to e700 as demonstrated in bench test.
    Flow SensorEquivalent to e700PneumotachographFlow sensor is equivalent to e700.
    Flow ControlPerformance similar to e700Proportional valves controlled by microprocessorSimilar to e700 (solenoid valves). "Despite the difference, the performance of both devices is similar as demonstrated in bench test."
    Trigger SensitivityParameter range equivalent to e700OFF; 1 to 15 L/minParameter range is equivalent to e700.
    Input PressurePerformance not affected by difference from e70039 to 87 psiDifferent to e700 (45-87 PSI). "The lower limit of Oxymag's input pressure is lower than e700, but the difference does not affect the performance of Oxymag. Oxymag delivers all ventilation parameters between 39 and 87 psi."
    PSV (Pressure Support Ventilation)Parameter range equivalent to e700OFF; 4 to 35 cmH2O (± 10% or ± 2 cmH2O)Parameter range is equivalent to e700.
    Ventilation FrequencyParameter range equivalent to e7005 to 60 breath/min (± 10% or ± 1 bpm)Parameter range is equivalent to e700.
    Tidal Volume (L)Parameter range equivalent to e70050 to 2000 mL (±20ml or ±15%)Parameter range is equivalent to e700.
    Manual Ventilation/Inspiration HoldEquivalent to e700YesParameter range is equivalent to e700.
    Inspiration time to expiration time ratioParameter range equivalent to e7001:4 to 3:1 (± 20%)Parameter range is equivalent to e700.
    Inspiration time Ti (sec.)Parameter range equivalent to e7000.2 to 9 s (± 20%)Parameter range is equivalent to e700.
    PEEP/CPAP (cm H2O)Parameter range equivalent to e700OFF; 4 to 20 (± 10% or ± 2 cmH2O)Parameter range is equivalent to e700.
    FiO2 (%)Parameter range equivalent to e70060 or 100 (± 15%)Parameter range is equivalent to e700.
    PmaxDoes not raise safety questions10 to 60 (± 10% or ± 2 cmH2O)Different to e700 (10-80 cmH2O). Oxymag has a more restricted upper limit, which generally implies enhanced safety.
    Safety relief valveEquivalent to e700YesSafety valve is equivalent to e700.
    Inhalation pressure (cmH2O)Parameter range equivalent to e700OFF; 4 to 50 cmH2O (± 10% or ± 2 cmH2O)Parameter range is equivalent to e700.
    Apnea Backup timeParameter range equivalent to e70010 to 60 secParameter range is equivalent to e700.
    MonitoringSimilar to e700, does not affect performanceMinute Volume, Volume Measured, Instant pressure measured, maximum inspiratory pressure, Respiratory Rate, Plateau pressure, PEEP, Flow, inspiratory time, expiratory time, Ratio I:E, Airway resistance, Dynamic compliance, Static compliance, FiO2, O2 consumptionOxymag has monitored parameters that e700 has and additional others, but the difference does not affect the performance of Oxymag.
    Waveform DisplayedEquivalent to e700Pressure and flowWaves are equivalent to e700.
    Alarms Audible/Visual & IndicationsSignificant alarms similar to e700; differences do not raise safety questionsDisconnection, Low airway pressure, High airway pressure, Low minute volume, High minute volume, Obstruction, Low supply pressure, Apnea, Low battery, High PEEP, Low PEEP, AC input fail, High volume and Low volume, High r. rate, Low r. rate, Low internal temperature, High internal temperature, Flow sensor off, HW:High O2 int.Significant alarms are similar to e700. Differences like additional ISO-required alarms or different alarm trigger mechanisms are stated not to raise safety questions.
    AccessoriesSignificant accessories equivalent to e700AC/DC power supply, Patient ventilation circuit, Oxygen supply hose, Environment filterSignificant accessories are equivalent to e700.
    Reprocessing of Patient CircuitEquivalent to e700Single usePatient circuit reprocessing is equivalent to e700.

    Regarding the Study (Performance Data provided for Substantial Equivalence):

    The document explicitly states: "There were no animal or clinical studies done for the subject device." This means that most of the specific questions about sample sizes, human experts, adjudication, and MRMC studies are not applicable to the data presented for this 510(k) submission.

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

    • Sample Size: Not applicable. No human test subjects were used. Performance data was derived from bench testing.
    • Data Provenance: Not applicable for human data. Bench testing was performed on the device itself.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

    • Not applicable. No human test set requiring expert ground truth was used.

    4. Adjudication method for the test set:

    • Not applicable. No human test set was used for adjudication.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

    • Not applicable. No MRMC study was done, as this is a ventilator and not an AI-assisted diagnostic device, and no human studies were conducted.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

    • Not applicable in the context of an algorithm's diagnostic performance. However, "Performance testing was conducted on the Oxymag to determine its specifications regarding ventilatory parameters" and "verification of technical data, comparison between Oxymag and the predicate e700, human factors evaluation, validation of ventilatory modes, alarm system, monitored parameters, auto test, hardware and mechanical specifications" serve as standalone device performance evaluations in a non-clinical setting.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):

    • For Biocompatibility: International standard ISO 10993-1 and FDA Guidance as recognized by FDA.
    • For Electrical Safety and EMC: IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-8, IEC 60601-1-12, IEC 80601-2-12, IEC 80601-2-55 for safety; IEC 60601-1-2 for EMC; AIM 7351732 for RFID.
    • For Software: FDA's Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices."
    • For Mechanical Testing: Device specifications based on engineering design and comparison to the predicate device's established performance. The "ground truth" here is the established and expected performance curves and parameter ranges for ventilators, often derived from industry standards and the predicate device's known capabilities.

    8. The sample size for the training set:

    • Not applicable. There is no mention of a training set as this is not an AI/machine learning device requiring such.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

    • Not applicable. No training set was used.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1