Search Results

The Osteo CT is intended to be used for routine assessment of bone mineral content in the vertebral bodies of the lumbar and thoracical spine with high precision through the use of SOMATOM CT scanners. It is also applicable to assessment of changes in bone mineral content over time.

OSTEO CT is a scan/evaluation option added to the SOMATOM AR family, and Plus 4 CT scanners. It provides assessment of the bone mineral density (BMD) through the use of single energy quantitative CT technology. An Osteo package contains 1 reference calibration phantom designed for all SOMATOM CT systems, 1 tabletop pad specially designed for housing the reference phantom, 1 coupling pad designed to eliminate possible air bubbles between the patient and the reference phantom, 1 foam insert to prevent the phantom from moving vertically within the tabletop pad and to eliminate possible air bubbles between the table and the reference phantom, 1 pad insert to prevent the phantom from moving longitudinally within the tabletop pad, and the bone mineral density scanning/evaluation software.

The provided text describes a 510(k) summary for the "Osteo CT Option for SOMATOM CT Systems," a device intended for assessing bone mineral density (BMD). However, it does not contain a detailed study with acceptance criteria and a comprehensive report of device performance against those criteria. The document is primarily a regulatory submission rather than a scientific publication of a clinical trial.

Therefore, many of the requested elements for describing acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets them cannot be directly extracted from the provided text.

Based on the available information, here's what can be inferred and what is missing:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:

This information is not present in the provided document. The document states "A multi-center clinical study was carried out in Europe to collect cortical and trabecular bone CT images from individuals with normal bone mineral density. The collected data, after statistical analysis, served as the reference database." However, it does not specify any performance metrics (e.g., accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity) for the device itself or any acceptance criteria that these metrics needed to meet.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

• Sample size for test set: Not explicitly stated. The document mentions a "multi-center clinical study" but does not provide the number of participants or scans.
• Data provenance: "Europe" (multi-center). The study collected data from "individuals with normal bone mineral density," suggesting it was for establishing a reference database rather than testing the device's diagnostic performance against a specific condition. It appears to be prospective data collection for establishing norms.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

This information is not provided. The study collected data to serve as a "reference database" from individuals with "normal bone mineral density." It's unclear if expert interpretation was part of establishing this "normality" or if it was based solely on the CT images themselves.

4. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:

This information is not provided. Given the described purpose of the study (establishing a reference database of "normal" bone density), a formal adjudication method for a "test set" in the diagnostic sense is unlikely to have been documented in this submission.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

• MRMC study: Not indicated. The document describes the device as a "scan/evaluation option" that assesses BMD. The function is to provide assessment, not to assist human readers in a diagnostic capacity in the way an AI algorithm might. Therefore, an MRMC study comparing human readers with and without AI assistance is not applicable to this device as described.
• Effect size: Not applicable/not provided.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

The device, "Osteo CT," is described as "assessment of the bone mineral density (BMD) through the use of single energy quantitative CT technology" and "calculates the patient's bone mineral density (BMD) with reference to the phantom, offer a reference database, and provide BMD results in both tabular and graphical forms." This suggests it is an algorithm-only (standalone) performance that provides calculated BMD values, which are then used by clinicians for interpretation. No human-in-the-loop interaction for performance improvement is implied for the device itself.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):

The study was conducted to establish a "reference database" of individuals with "normal bone mineral density." While the exact method for determining "normal" isn't detailed, it implies a baseline of healthy individuals. It's not stated that an independent "ground truth" like pathology or long-term outcomes data was used to validate the device's accuracy against a disease state, but rather to establish a normal range.

8. The sample size for the training set:

The document mentions that the "collected data, after statistical analysis, served as the reference database." This "reference database" likely functions as what would be considered a training/reference set for the device's internal calculations. The sample size for this set is not provided.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

The ground truth for the "reference database" was established by collecting cortical and trabecular bone CT images from individuals with "normal bone mineral density" in a multi-center clinical study in Europe. The specific criteria for defining "normal" BMD for inclusion in this study are not detailed, but it suggests a population presumed to be healthy in terms of bone density.

Ask a specific question about this device