Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K984244
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1999-02-23

    (88 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.4200
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    ORL-E-92 SURGICAL DRILL SYSTEM

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Bien-Air ORL-E-92 Surgical Drill System is indicated for the preparation of intraoral bone for microsurgery and implantology and for apicoectomies.

    Device Description

    The Bien-Air ORL-E-92 Surgical Drill System is a series of components used in implantology and microsurgery. The system consists of a foot pedal control unit, BASCH electric micromotor and cable and transformer. Several models of straight and contra-angled microsurgery handpieces are available for use with the ORL-E-92 system. A separate irrigation system consisting of peristaltic pump, irrigation tubing and solution supports complements the ORL-E-92 system.

    AI/ML Overview

    The Bien-Air ORL-E-92 Surgical Drill System is a Class I device and, as such, no formal performance data was submitted to prove the device meets acceptance criteria. The submission indicates that "sterilization certification of the product by steam sterilization was provided." This suggests that the primary acceptance criterion related to performance was likely the successful sterilization of the device by steam.

    Here's a breakdown of the requested information based on the provided document:

    1. Table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    Acceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
    SterilizationSterilization certification by steam sterilization was provided.
    FunctionalityNot explicitly detailed, but implied to be equivalent to predicate devices (speed, rotation, irrigation, autoclavability).

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

    No formal performance data was submitted, so there is no information regarding a specific test set, its sample size, or data provenance. The submission focuses on substantial equivalence to predicate devices and sterilization certification.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

    Not applicable, as no formal performance study with a test set requiring expert ground truth was conducted or submitted.

    4. Adjudication method for the test set

    Not applicable, as no formal performance study with a test set was conducted or submitted.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    Not applicable. This device is a surgical drill system, not an AI-assisted diagnostic or imaging device.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    Not applicable. This device is a surgical drill system, not an algorithm.

    7. The type of ground truth used

    For sterilization, the "ground truth" would be the successful validation of the sterilization process as per industry standards and regulatory guidelines, and its certification. For the functional aspects, the ground truth for substantial equivalence was the comparison to the existing predicate devices.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    Not applicable, as no algorithm or machine learning model was developed for this device.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    Not applicable, as no algorithm or machine learning model was developed for this device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1