Search Results

The Olympus Lyophilized Calibrator is a two level general purpose chemistry calibrator designed to provide suitable calibration levels for OLYMPUS analyzers employing the OLYMPUS Methodologies.

Not Found

The provided text is a 510(k) premarket notification letter from the FDA to Olympus America, Inc. regarding a device called "Olympus Lyophilized Calibrator." This document primarily deals with the regulatory approval of a calibrator (a lab reagent used to ensure the accuracy of other tests) rather than a diagnostic device that performs analysis or interpretation of medical images or data.

Therefore, the requested information about acceptance criteria, study design, sample sizes, expert involvement, and ground truth for device performance in the context of a typical AI/medical imaging device is not applicable to this document.

The document states: "We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976."

This means the device's acceptance was based on showing substantial equivalence to existing predicate devices, not on a detailed clinical performance study against specific acceptance criteria in the way a diagnostic AI algorithm would be evaluated.

To directly address the user's request with respect to this document:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: Not applicable. The document does not contain this information for a diagnostic AI device. The acceptance was based on substantial equivalence to a predicate device for its intended use as a calibrator.
2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable. This information is not provided as it's not a diagnostic AI study.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. Ground truth in the context of expert review for diagnostic accuracy is not relevant here.
4. Adjudication method: Not applicable.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This is not a diagnostic AI device.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done: Not applicable. This is a calibrator, not a standalone diagnostic algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used: Not applicable in the context of diagnostic performance. For a calibrator, "ground truth" would relate to its known, accurate concentration values used to calibrate other assays.
8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. This is not an AI algorithm requiring a training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

In summary, the provided text does not contain the type of information requested, as it pertains to the regulatory approval of a laboratory calibrator, not a diagnostic AI device.

Ask a specific question about this device