Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(444 days)
NOFACT IX
NoFact IX Deficient Plasma is a human plasma immunodepleted of Factor IX and intended for the quantitative determination of Factor IX activity in citrated plasma from patients suspected of FIX deficiency. FIX activity is based on the activated partial thromboplastin time. For in vitro diagnostic use.
NoFact IX Deficient Plasma is a human plasma immunodepleted of Factor IX and intended for the quantitative determination of Factor IX activity in citrated plasma from patients suspected of FIX deficiency. FIX activity is based on the activated partial thromboplast time. For in vitro diagnostic use.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study detailed in the provided 510(k) summary for the NoFact IX Deficient Plasma device:
Important Note: The provided document is a 510(k) summary for an in vitro diagnostic device, specifically a deficient plasma product used in laboratory tests. It is not an AI or imaging device, and therefore many sections of your request (like "Number of experts used to establish the ground truth," "Adjudication method," "MRMC comparative effectiveness study," and "Standalone performance") are not applicable to this type of medical device submission. I will address only the relevant information from the document.
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance for NoFact IX Deficient Plasma
The device, NoFact IX Deficient Plasma, is an in vitro diagnostic intended for the quantitative determination of Factor IX activity. Its performance is demonstrated through a comparison study with a legally marketed predicate device (STA Deficient IX) and precision testing.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Since this is a 510(k) for an in vitro diagnostic, the "acceptance criteria" are not explicitly stated with numerical thresholds in the provided summary in the same way they might be for an AI model. Instead, the acceptance is based on demonstrating "substantial equivalence" to a predicate device through a strong correlation in quantitative measurements and acceptable precision. The reported performance metrics are derived from this equivalence study and precision assessment.
Performance Metric | Acceptance Criteria (Implied for Substantial Equivalence) | Reported Device Performance (NoFact IX vs. Predicate) |
---|---|---|
Comparative Study (Linear Regression) | All Labs (N=233) | |
- Coefficient of Determination (r²) | Strong correlation with predicate device (typically r² > 0.90 is desired for quantitative comparison) | 0.915 |
- Correlation Coefficient (r) | Strong linear relationship | 0.956 |
- Slope | Close to 1 (indicating proportional agreement) | 0.858 |
- Intercept | Close to 0 (indicating minimal constant bias) | 5.729 |
Precision (CV%) - Normal Control | Acceptable within-run and lot-to-lot variability for an IVD measuring coagulation factors (target typically |
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1