Search Filters

Search Results

Found 2 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K002773
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2000-10-23

    (47 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    882.1870
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    NEUROMAP WITH NEURO 100

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use
    Device Description
    AI/ML Overview
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K981820
    Device Name
    NEUROMAP
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1998-11-20

    (182 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    882.1330
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    NEUROMAP

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Radionics, Inc. NeuroMap™ is intended to be used to assist neurosurgeons in the operating room during functional neurosurgery. The system displays and stores electrophysiological activity of the CNS relayed from electrodes placed within the brain and on the surface of the skin. NeuroMap™ helps the neurosurgeons determine the location of certain brain structures before lesioning is performed by allowing them to examine and analyze the electrical signals.

    Device Description

    The system displays and stores electrophysiological activity of the CNS relayed from electrodes placed within the brain and on the surface of the skin.

    AI/ML Overview

    This FDA clearance letter (K981820) for the Radionics, Inc. NeuroMap™ device does not contain any information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets said criteria.

    The letter is a standard 510(k) clearance document, indicating that the device has been found substantially equivalent to a predicate device and can therefore be legally marketed. It focuses on regulatory aspects such as:

    • Substantial Equivalence: The primary basis for clearance is that the NeuroMap™ is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices, meaning it has the same intended use and technological characteristics, or different technological characteristics that do not raise different questions of safety and effectiveness.
    • Intended Use: The letter explicitly states the intended use of the device: "to assist neurosurgeons in the operating room during functional neurosurgery. The system displays and stores electrophysiological activity of the CNS relayed from electrodes placed within the brain and on the surface of the skin. NeuroMap™ helps the neurosurgeons determine the location of certain brain structures before lesioning is performed by allowing them to examine and analyze the electrical signals."
    • Regulatory Class: The device is classified as Class II.
    • General Controls: The letter reminds the manufacturer of general controls provisions of the Act (annual registration, listing, good manufacturing practice, labeling, prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration).

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information regarding acceptance criteria, device performance tables, sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, or ground truth details because this information is not present in the provided document.

    Such details would typically be found in the 510(k) summary or in the premarket notification submission itself, which is a much more extensive document than the clearance letter. The clearance letter only announces the agency's decision based on its review of that submission.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1