Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(127 days)
MYSHELL is indicated for maintaining a seal around diagnostic/interventional devices with an outside diameter <9F (<.098") during interventional procedures.
The 3-way stopcock, Alligatork and guidewire introducer are accessories used in conjunction with MYSHELL to facilitate interventional procedures.
MYSHELL and its accessories are indicated for assisting, manipulating and maintaining a seal around diagnostic/interventional devices with an outside diameter <9F (.098") used in interventional procedures.
MYSHELL is an ergonomically designed y-connector/hemostatic valve that accepts materials up to 9F in size (<.098").
The watertight double hemostatic silicone valve is manipulated by a valve opening mechanism on the external body of MYSHELL. The opening mechanism allows for precise control of the internal valve: press gradually on the mechanism for a controlled opening, push the mechanism entirely in for a complete and locked opening, or completely close the valve by depressing on the mechanism in its locked position.
The provided text states that "The safety and efficacy of MYSHELL and its accessories... have been demonstrated," but it does not provide any specific acceptance criteria or details of a study verifying those criteria.
Therefore, I cannot populate the table or answer the specific questions about the study from the provided document. The submission is a 510(k) summary for a medical device (Y-Connector/Hemostatic Valve), which typically focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than providing detailed performance study results with acceptance criteria.
Information not found in the provided document:
- A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
- Sample size used for the test set.
- Data provenance for the test set.
- Number of experts used to establish ground truth for the test set.
- Qualifications of experts.
- Adjudication method for the test set.
- Whether a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done.
- Effect size (if MRMC was done).
- Whether a standalone performance study was done.
- Type of ground truth used (e.g., expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data).
- Sample size for the training set.
- How ground truth for the training set was established.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1