Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K102433
    Date Cleared
    2010-11-18

    (84 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    870.2100
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    MOORVMS-PRES PRESSURE CUFF CONTROLLER

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The moorVMS-PRES pressure cuff controller is a device for cuff inflation and deflation control and pressure measurement. It is intended to allow non-invasive measurement of skin perfusion pressure, pulse volume, systolic blood pressure and ankle/toe brachial pressure index when used with a laser Doppler monitor either manually by the operator or automatically by separate dedicated PC software.

    Device Description

    The moorVMS-PRES vascular assessment pressure cuff controller is a device for cuff inflation and deflation control and pressure measurement. It allows connection of a range of standard pressure cuffs, ranging in size from small digit cuffs. It incorporates an air pump for cuff inflation and a proportional valve for controlled deflation. The moorVMS-PRES provides measurement of cuff gauge pressure which can be displayed on the front panel, and also the AC component of the cuff pressure (referred to as pulse volume) which can be outputted as analogue signals via a BNC connector or as digital data via the USB port.

    The moorVMS-PRES is capable of performing timed inflation/deflation sequences when used alone and also be capable of remote control when connected to a PC via USB.

    The moorVMS-PRES is intended to form part of a modular vascular monitoring system when used in conjunction with the moorVMS-LDF laser Doppler perfusion and temperature monitors. When used in this way the instruments will be controlled and monitored via USB using PC software to perform vascular assessment such as Skin Perfusion Pressure (SPP), Limb Blood Pressure or Toe Blood Pressure (LBP/TBP), Pulse Volume (PV), and Post Occlusive Reactive Hyperemia (PORH) analyses.

    AI/ML Overview

    The moorVMS-PRES Pressure Cuff Controller, a device for cuff inflation, deflation control, and pressure measurement, addresses its acceptance criteria and supporting study within the provided document through a comparison to a predicate device and compliance with established performance standards.

    The document primarily focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to a predicate device, the Perimed PF 5050 Pressure Unit (K011899), rather than presenting a de novo clinical study with specific performance metrics and dedicated test sets.

    Here's a breakdown based on the provided text:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    The document does not provide a table of acceptance criteria with specific numerical targets and corresponding device performance values. Instead, it relies on a qualitative comparison to the predicate device and compliance with general safety and performance standards.

    The key acceptance criteria and reported performance are implicitly stated through the comparison to the predicate device:

    Acceptance Criteria (Implicit)Reported Device Performance (as stated in the document)
    Accuracy (of cuff pressure and PV pressure oscillations)"The performance of the moorVMS-PRES is equivalent to or greater than that of the predicate device [PF 5050] in terms of accuracy..."
    Inflation Control"The performance of the moorVMS-PRES is equivalent to or greater than that of the predicate device in terms of... inflation."
    Deflation Control"The performance of the moorVMS-PRES is equivalent to or greater than that of the predicate device in terms of... deflation."
    Biocompatibility"The moorVMS-PRES has the same levels of biocompatibility... as the predicate device PF 5050 Pressure Unit."
    Sterilization (if applicable for external contact parts)"The moorVMS-PRES has the same levels of... sterilization... as the predicate device PF 5050 Pressure Unit."
    Electrical Safety"The moorVMS-PRES has the same levels of... electrical safety as the predicate device PF 5050 Pressure Unit."
    Pressure Safety"The moorVMS-PRES pressure safety is equivalent to or greater than that of the predicate device."
    General Safety and Essential PerformanceCompliance with IEC 60601-1:2005 and its corrigendum.
    Electromagnetic CompatibilityCompliance with IEC 60601-1-2:2007.
    UsabilityCompliance with IEC 60601-1-6:2006.
    Biological Evaluation of Medical DevicesCompliance with ISO 10993-1:2003.
    Functionality (e.g., inflation/deflation sequences, remote control, PC software integration for SPP, LBP/TBP, PV, PORH analyses)The device is described as capable of performing these functions, and these are deemed equivalent to or enhanced compared to the predicate. For example, it automatically controls inflation/deflation, whereas the predicate used a manual pump for inflation.

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

    The document does not explicitly mention a sample size for a dedicated test set for evaluating the moorVMS-PRES's performance. The basis for proving acceptance criteria is primarily through:

    • Comparison to a predicate device: This implies that the predicate device's established performance serves as the benchmark.
    • Compliance with international standards: This typically involves laboratory testing against specified requirements, but the document does not detail the specific tests conducted, the number of units tested, or the data provenance for these compliance tests.

    Therefore, no specific sample size, country of origin, or information on whether the data was retrospective or prospective is provided for a test set in the context of a clinical performance study.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

    This information is not provided in the document as there is no mention of a clinical test set requiring expert ground truth establishment.

    4. Adjudication method for the test set

    This information is not provided in the document, as no clinical test set requiring adjudication is described.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study involving human readers and AI assistance was not done or described in this document. The device is a "Pressure Cuff Controller" and is not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool in the sense of image interpretation where MRMC studies are common.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done

    The device itself is a piece of hardware that performs physical actions (cuff inflation/deflation) and measurements. Its performance is inherent to its design and calibration, not a standalone algorithm in the typical sense of AI/image processing. The document focuses on its inherent performance characteristics and its capability to integrate with PC software for analyses. Therefore, this question doesn't directly apply, but the "standalone" performance is implicitly covered by the accuracy and safety standards listed.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

    For the direct comparison and performance claims, the "ground truth" is established by:

    • Predicate device performance: The established and accepted performance of the Perimed PF 5050 Pressure Unit serves as the benchmark.
    • International standards: Compliance with standards like IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60601-1-6, and ISO 10993-1 means the device has met predefined technical and safety specifications, which act as the "ground truth" for those specific aspects.

    There is no mention of expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data being used as ground truth for a clinical validation or performance study.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    This information is not applicable/provided. The moorVMS-PRES is a physical medical device, not a machine learning model that requires a "training set" in the context of AI.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    This information is not applicable/provided, for the same reasons as point 8.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1