LogoFDA 510(k) Search
Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K964227
    Device Name
    METAL ACETABULAR COMPONENT
    Manufacturer
    ENCORE ORTHOPEDICS, INC.
    Date Cleared
    1997-01-14

    (83 days)

    Product Code
    LPH
    Regulation Number
    888.3358
    Type
    Traditional
    Panel
    Orthopedic
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Predicate For
    N/A
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The metal backed acetabular component is intended for treatment of patients who are candidates for total hip arthroplasty because the natural femoral head and neck and/or acetabulum have been affected by osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, traumatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, avascular necrosis or femoral neck fracture, and revision arthroplasty where bone loss is minimal. These devices are intended to aid the surgeon in relieving the patient of hip pain and restoring hip motion.

    Device Description

    The hemispherical metal shell is fabricated from wrought/forged or cast Ti-6Al-4V. The outside surface of the shell is plasma sprayed to provide a roughened surface for press-fit enhanced fixation. The metal shell has three spikes to provide enhanced press-fit fixation.

    The poly liners are manufactured from ultra high molecular weight polyethylene and are available in a neutral and 10° hooded design. The hooded design is intended for those patients prone to subluxation because of soft tissue laxity.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes a medical device, the Encore Orthopedics® Metal Acetabular Component, and its intended use, comparable features, and some test results. However, it does not include information about acceptance criteria or a study that proves the device meets specific performance criteria in a way that aligns with the structured request for AI/diagnostic device evaluation.

    The "Test Results" section is very brief and states: "Testing on this device included porous attachment strength of liners to shell. All results are sufficient for in-vivo loading." This is a general statement about mechanical testing, not a detailed study of diagnostic accuracy or a comparison against an acceptance criterion in the way an AI/diagnostic device would be evaluated.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request as the necessary information for a study proving acceptance criteria, especially regarding AI/diagnostic device evaluation metrics, is not present in the provided text.

    If you have a different document or an AI/diagnostic device summary, I would be happy to analyze it according to your criteria.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1