Search Results
Found 3 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(68 days)
A patient examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purposes that is worn on the examiner's hand to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.
Powder Free Latex Patient Examination Glove, with Protein Content Labeling Claim, Chlorinated (Contains 50 Micrograms per dm2 of glove or Less of Water Extractable Protein) meets all the current specification for ASTM D3578-05 (2010).
The provided text is for a 510(k) Premarket Notification for a medical device, specifically a Powder Free Latex Patient Examination Glove. This type of submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, primarily through non-clinical performance data and comparison of technological characteristics, rather than extensive clinical studies as one might find for a novel diagnostic AI device.
Therefore, many of the typical acceptance criteria and study details requested (e.g., sample size for test set, number of experts for ground truth, adjudication method, MRMC studies, standalone algorithm performance, training set details) are not applicable to this type of device and submission. The "study" here refers to the testing performed to meet specific ASTM standards and biocompatibility requirements.
Here's a breakdown of the information that is applicable and how it relates to the acceptance criteria:
1. Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The acceptance criteria for this device are defined by existing ASTM standards and biocompatibility testing. The device's performance is reported as meeting these standards.
| Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Standards) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ASTM D 3578-05 (2010) | Meets |
| Physical Properties | ASTM D 3578-05 (2010) | Meets |
| Freedom from pin-holes | ASTM D 5151-99 (2006), ASTM D 3578-05 (2010) | Meets |
| Powder Free Residue | ASTM D 6124-06, ASTM D 3578-05 (2010) | Meets |
| Protein Content | ASTM D 5712-10, ASTM D 3578-05 (2010) | Meets |
| Biocompatibility (Dermal Sensitization) | ISO 10993-10:2010 | Not a contact skin sensitizer |
| Biocompatibility (Primary Skin Irritation) | ISO 10993-10:2010 | Not a primary skin irritant |
| Intended Use | Disposable device for medical purposes, worn on examiner's hand to prevent contamination between patient and examiner. | Identical to predicate device |
| Regulation Number | 21 CFR Part 880.6250 | Identical to predicate device |
| Product Code | 80 LYY | Identical to predicate device |
| Design | Ambidextrous, in different sizes per ASTM D3578 dimension requirement. | Identical to predicate device |
| Materials | Natural Rubber Latex | Identical to predicate device |
| Color | Natural Color | Identical to predicate device |
| Sterility | Not Applicable (Non-Sterile) | Identical to predicate device |
| Single Use | Yes | Identical to predicate device |
| Packaging | Packed in Dispenser Boxes | Identical to predicate device |
| Labeling Claim | With Extractable Protein Content Labeling Claim (50 Micrograms per dm² of glove or less of Water Extractable Protein) | Identical to predicate device |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
The document specifies that the device "meets all the current specification for ASTM D3578-05 (2010)" and refers to other ASTM and ISO standards for specific characteristics. Clinical data was "not needed for market cleared examination gloves."
- Sample Size for Test Set: The specific sample sizes for each test (e.g., pin-holes, dimensions, physical properties) are not detailed in this 510(k) summary. These would typically be specified within the individual ASTM and ISO standards referenced. For example, ASTM D5151-99 for freedom from pinholes often specifies a sample size based on the acceptable quality level (AQL).
- Data Provenance: The document does not explicitly state the country of origin for the data (e.g., where the tests were physically conducted) nor whether it was retrospective or prospective. Given the nature of performance testing against standards, it would be prospective testing of newly manufactured glove batches. The manufacturer is "Top Calibre Sdn Bhd" in Selangor, Malaysia, so the testing was likely conducted by or for them.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
Not Applicable: This type of device does not involve a "ground truth" established by experts in a diagnostic or interpretive sense. The ground truth for performance characteristics is defined by the objective measurement criteria within the relevant ASTM and ISO standards (e.g., tensile strength, elongation, water leak rate, protein content measurement). Biocompatibility tests are performed by qualified laboratories and assessed against established toxicology criteria.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not Applicable: Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are used for human-reviewed data, often in diagnostic imaging or clinical trials, to resolve discrepancies between readers. For physical and chemical tests of gloves, results are objectively measured against defined thresholds in the standards; there is no subjective interpretation requiring adjudication.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not Applicable: This device is a patient examination glove, not an AI-powered diagnostic tool. Therefore, MRMC studies and assessments of AI assistance are irrelevant.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done
Not Applicable: This device is a physical medical device (glove), not an algorithm or software. Standalone algorithm performance is not relevant.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
The "ground truth" for this device's performance is established by objective measurements against predefined criteria and thresholds set forth in the referenced ASTM and ISO standards.
- For Dimensions, Physical Properties, Freedom from pin-holes, Powder Free Residue, Protein Content: The ground truth is the quantitative measurement of these properties (e.g., thickness, tensile strength, percentage of gloves passing water leak test, specific protein content in µg/dm²) compared to the specified limits in standards like ASTM D3578-05 (2010), ASTM D5151-99 (2006), ASTM D6124-06, and ASTM D5712-10.
- For Biocompatibility: The ground truth is determined by the results of standardized biological tests (Dermal Sensitization and Primary Skin Irritation Tests as per ISO 10993-10:2010), which assess the device's potential to cause adverse biological reactions. The "ground truth" in this context is the observation of whether a reaction occurs and its severity, interpreted against established toxicity criteria, leading to a "pass" or "fail" determination (e.g., "Not a contact skin sensitizer," "Not a primary skin irritant").
8. The sample size for the training set
Not Applicable: This device does not use machine learning or AI, so there is no "training set."
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not Applicable: As there is no training set, this question is not relevant.
Ask a specific question about this device
(83 days)
EXAMINATION GLOVES POWDER FREE IS A POWDER FREE LATEX DISPOSABLE DEVICE MADE OF NATURAL RUBBER LATEX INTENDED FOR MEDICAL PURPOSE THAT IS WORN ON THE EXAMINERS HAND ob eximali contrail contrainer time between batten and EXAMINER.
Class I Patient Examination Gloves Latex (Powder free) 80L Y Y that meets all the requirements of ASTM D3578
The device is a Latex Examination Glove (Powder free) manufactured by Brightway Gloves Pvt. Ltd., intended for medical purposes to prevent contamination between patients and examiners. The acceptance criteria and performance data are detailed below, comparing the device's characteristics against ASTM D3578 requirements.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Characteristic | Size | Acceptance Criteria (ASTM D3578 Requirement) | Reported Device Performance (Brightway Gloves Value) | Meets Criteria? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length | EX-S | 220 mm minimum | 235-240 mm | Yes |
| S | 220 mm minimum | 235-240 mm | Yes | |
| M | 230 mm minimum | 235-240 mm | Yes | |
| L | 230 mm minimum | 235-240 mm | Yes | |
| Width | EX S | 70 +/- 6 mm | 70 mm | Yes |
| S | 80 +/- 6 mm | 82 mm | Yes | |
| M | 95 +/- 6 mm | 93 mm | Yes | |
| L | 111 +/- 6 mm | 107 mm | Yes | |
| Thickness | EX S | 0.08 mm minimum | 0.10 mm | Yes |
| S | 0.08 mm minimum | 0.10 mm | Yes | |
| M | 0.08 mm minimum | 0.10 mm | Yes | |
| L | 0.08 mm minimum | 0.10 mm | Yes | |
| Physical Properties (Before Ageing) | ||||
| Tensile Strength | 14 mpa min | 20 - 22 mpa | Yes | |
| Elongation at break % | 700% min | 750 - 800% (or 750-850% in performance data) | Yes | |
| Physical Properties (After Ageing) | ||||
| Tensile Strength | 14 mpa min | 18 - 20 mpa | Yes | |
| Elongation at break % | 500% min | 700 - 800% | Yes | |
| Performance Requirement | ||||
| Freedom from Holes | Holes | AQL 4 | AQL 1.5 | Yes (lower AQL is better) |
| Dimension | Width, Length, Thickness | AQL 4 | AQL 4 | Yes |
| Physical Property | Tensile Strength, Elongation at Break | AQL 4 | AQL 4 | Yes |
| Powder Content | Not explicitly stated in ASTM D3578, but implied by "powder free" | 1 +/- 1 mg per glove | N/A (meets "powder free" claim) | |
| Protein Content | Not explicitly stated in ASTM D3578 | 80 +/- 20 ppm | N/A | |
| Moisture Content | Not explicitly stated in ASTM D3578 | 0.8% max | N/A | |
| Biocompatibility | Not explicitly stated in ASTM D3578 | Biologically Compatible | N/A (meets general expectation) |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
The document states that the performance test data is for "Latex Examination Glove powder free manufactured by M/S Brightway Gloves Pvt.Ltd." However, the sample size used for these tests is not explicitly stated in the provided document. The data provenance is
retrospective by the manufacturer, Brightway Gloves Pvt. Ltd., located in Tamil Nadu, India.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
Not applicable. The ground truth for the physical and performance properties of the gloves is established by the ASTM D3578 standard specifications. No human expert "ground truthing" is mentioned or implied for these types of measurements.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable. This is a measurement of physical and performance characteristics against a standard, not a subjective assessment requiring adjudication among experts.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This device is a Latex Examination Glove, not an AI or diagnostic medical device that would involve human readers or AI assistance.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This device is a Latex Examination Glove, not an AI or algorithmic device.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
The ground truth is based on the ASTM D3578 standard specifications for Latex Examination Gloves. These are established industry standards for the physical and performance characteristics of such gloves.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. This is a physical medical device, not a machine learning model, so there is no concept of a "training set."
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable, as there is no training set for this type of device.
Ask a specific question about this device
(37 days)
A patient examination glove is a disposable device intended for medical purpose that is worn on the examiner's hand or finger to prevent contamination between patient and examiner.
Powder-Free, Latex Patient Examination Gloves
The provided text is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for "Latex Examination Gloves (Powder Free)". This document does not contain any information about acceptance criteria, device performance, study details, ground truth, or statistical analyses typically associated with AI/ML device studies.
Therefore, I cannot populate the requested table or answer the specific questions because the information is not present in the provided text. The document is a regulatory approval letter for a physical medical device (gloves), not an AI/ML algorithm.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1