Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K112960
    Date Cleared
    2012-01-09

    (96 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3040
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    LABRALINK SUTURE ANCHOR WITH INSERTER, 2.9MM PER-LOADED WITH ONE (1) AND (2) #2 UHMWPE SUTURE

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Cayenne Medical, Inc. LabraLink™ Suture Anchor is intended for the reattachment of soft tissue to bone for shoulder procedures such as Bankart repair and SLAP lesion repair.

    Device Description

    The LabraLink™ Suture Anchor is a sterile, manually operated, single procedure suture anchor device for reattachment of soft tissue to bone for shoulder procedures such as Bankart repair and SLAP lesion repair. The anchor has two suture eyelets allowing for one or two sutures to be loaded through the eyelets. The suture anchor is mounted on an inserter. The LabraLink Suture Anchor incorporates design features that facilitate suture anchor placement under arthroscopic, open, or limited access conditions in soft tissue to bone for shoulder procedures such as Bankart repair and SLAP lesion repair.

    The LabraLink Suture Anchor is offered in one size, 2.9 x 15 mm with four suture color options. The anchors are offered in two configurations, single loaded or double loaded sutures. Suture(s) used on the anchor are size # 2 non-absorbable surgical sutures. The LabraLink inserter has a working length of 25.8 cm with an outer shaft diameter of 3.2 mm.

    Mechanical testing was performed on the LabraLink Suture Anchor and a predicate device. Testing showed ultimate pull-out strength was significantly higher than the predicate device.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the LabraLink™ Suture Anchor, a medical device. It does not describe acceptance criteria for a study, nor does it present results from a clinical study to prove the device meets such criteria. Instead, it details the device's technical specifications, intended use, and substantial equivalence to previously marketed predicate devices, which is the basis for its FDA clearance.

    Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information as it is not present in the provided document. The document focuses on regulatory clearance based on substantial equivalence, primarily through mechanical testing comparisons with predicate devices, rather than a clinical study with detailed acceptance criteria and performance metrics against human expert ground truth.

    If you have a different document that describes such a study, please provide it.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1