Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(96 days)
LABRALINK SUTURE ANCHOR WITH INSERTER, 2.9MM PER-LOADED WITH ONE (1) AND (2) #2 UHMWPE SUTURE
The Cayenne Medical, Inc. LabraLink™ Suture Anchor is intended for the reattachment of soft tissue to bone for shoulder procedures such as Bankart repair and SLAP lesion repair.
The LabraLink™ Suture Anchor is a sterile, manually operated, single procedure suture anchor device for reattachment of soft tissue to bone for shoulder procedures such as Bankart repair and SLAP lesion repair. The anchor has two suture eyelets allowing for one or two sutures to be loaded through the eyelets. The suture anchor is mounted on an inserter. The LabraLink Suture Anchor incorporates design features that facilitate suture anchor placement under arthroscopic, open, or limited access conditions in soft tissue to bone for shoulder procedures such as Bankart repair and SLAP lesion repair.
The LabraLink Suture Anchor is offered in one size, 2.9 x 15 mm with four suture color options. The anchors are offered in two configurations, single loaded or double loaded sutures. Suture(s) used on the anchor are size # 2 non-absorbable surgical sutures. The LabraLink inserter has a working length of 25.8 cm with an outer shaft diameter of 3.2 mm.
Mechanical testing was performed on the LabraLink Suture Anchor and a predicate device. Testing showed ultimate pull-out strength was significantly higher than the predicate device.
The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the LabraLink™ Suture Anchor, a medical device. It does not describe acceptance criteria for a study, nor does it present results from a clinical study to prove the device meets such criteria. Instead, it details the device's technical specifications, intended use, and substantial equivalence to previously marketed predicate devices, which is the basis for its FDA clearance.
Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information as it is not present in the provided document. The document focuses on regulatory clearance based on substantial equivalence, primarily through mechanical testing comparisons with predicate devices, rather than a clinical study with detailed acceptance criteria and performance metrics against human expert ground truth.
If you have a different document that describes such a study, please provide it.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1