Search Results

The Neo Diagnostics KetoChecks is intended for the identification of ketones in urine and can be used in the diagnosis of acidosis (a condition characterized by abnormally high acidity of body fluids) or ketosis (a condition characterized by increased production of ketone bodies such as Acetoacetic acid) and for monitoring patients on ketogenic diets and patients with diabetes. The test is indicated for use by professionals and for Over the Counter use by lay people.

KetoChecks for Urinalysis is firm plastic strips to which a reagent area is affixed. Depending on the product being used, KetoChecks provides a test for Ketone (Acetoacetic acid) in Urine. Test results may provide information regarding the status of carbohydrate metabolism. Please refer to the outside box and bottle label for the specific test parameters of the product you are using.

KetoChecks is packaged along with a drying agent in a plastic bottle with a twist-off cap. Each strip is stable and ready to use upon removal from the bottle. The entire reagent strip is disposable. The directions must be followed exactly. Results are obtained by direct comparison of the test strip with the color blocks printed on the bottle label. Accurate timing is essential to provide optimal results. To obtain optimal results, it is necessary to use fresh, well-mixed, and uncentrifuged urine. No calculations or laboratory instruments are needed.

Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study proving the device meets them, based on the provided text for K033114:

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance

The provided document defines accuracy based on the comparison of the KetoChecks strips to a color chart, which is itself determined by the color blocks on the bottle label. The closest thing to explicit "acceptance criteria" for performance is within the clinical correlation study, where the device (KetoChecks) is compared against a legally marketed predicate device (Bayer Ketostix).

Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Note: The document explicitly states: "For visually read strips, accuracy is a function of the manner in which the color blocks on the bottle label are determined and the discrimination of the human eye in reading the test. Precision is difficult to assess in a test of this type because of the variability of the human eye. It is for this reason that users are encouraged to develop their own standards of performance." This implies that the primary acceptance criteria revolve around the device's ability to produce consistent results with its own color chart and to perform comparably to a well-established predicate device.

Study Details

The study presented focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to the Bayer Ketostix reagent strips.

1. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:

   • Test Set Sample Size:
     • For the comparison of KetoChecks Lot 1 vs. Bayer Ketostix Lot 3A04A: 218 unknown urine samples were used.
     • For the comparison of KetoChecks Lot 1 vs. KetoChecks Lot 2 (internal consistency): 138 unknown urine samples were used.
   • Data Provenance: The document does not specify the country of origin. It indicates that "clinical tests" were performed, suggesting prospective collection of urine samples for the purpose of this evaluation. However, details on ethical approvals or patient demographics are not provided.

2. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts:

   • The document implies that the ground truth for the comparison was based on the visual readings of the KetoChecks strips and the Bayer Ketostix strips themselves. It does not mention an independent "ground truth" established by a panel of experts in the traditional sense, such as pathology or a gold standard instrument.
   • For visually read strips, the document states, "Comparison to the color chart is dependent on the interpretation of the individual. It is, therefore, recommended that all laboratory personnel interpreting the results of these strips be tested for color blindness." This suggests that the "experts" are the "laboratory personnel" performing the visual comparisons, but their number and specific qualifications (e.g., years of experience as a lab technician) are not detailed.

3. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:

   • No explicit adjudication method (like 2+1 or 3+1) is described. The results are presented as direct comparisons (e.g., "Same Color Block," "Within 1 Color Block"). It appears that the reading itself is the primary data point, and there's no mention of a process to resolve discrepancies between multiple readers, if multiple readers were used.

4. Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:

   • No, a formal MRMC comparative effectiveness study, as typically understood in the context of advanced AI devices, was not performed. The study is a comparison of two visual dipstick products, focused on agreement between the new device and the predicate device, not on how human readers' performance with or without AI-assistance improves clinical outcomes or accuracy compared to a true gold standard.

5. Standalone Performance:

   • Yes, a standalone performance evaluation was done in the sense that the KetoChecks device was read visually by an individual and compared against the color chart provided with the device and also against the results obtained from the predicate device. It represents the inherent performance of the device and a human reader in tandem, without assistance from an AI algorithm. The device itself is solely a visual reagent test strip, so its "standalone" performance is its direct visual interpretability.

6. Type of Ground Truth Used:

   • The primary "ground truth" for evaluating the KetoChecks' performance relative to the predicate was agreement with the Bayer Ketostix results. For internal consistency, the ground truth was the visual reading of the KetoChecks strip itself by the "individual" (presumably lab personnel). There is no mention of pathology, advanced laboratory instrumentation, or long-term clinical outcomes data being used as ground truth. This is typical for equivalence claims for simple diagnostic strips.

7. Sample Size for the Training Set:

   • This question is not applicable in the context of this device and study. The KetoChecks is a chemical reagent strip for visual interpretation, not a machine learning or AI-based device that requires a "training set" of data in the computational sense. The "training" for such a device would involve optimizing the chemical reagents and color chart design.

8. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:

   • This question is not applicable for the same reasons as point 7. The "ground truth" for the development of such a strip would involve precise chemical formulations and calibration against known concentrations of ketones to ensure proper color development at specific thresholds, but this is not a "training set" in the AI sense.

Ask a specific question about this device