Search Results

The IRIS XP is a thermal based imaging device intended for measuring relative skin temperature generated by the human body in the clinical, hospital, acute care settings, surgery, healthcare practitioner facilities or in any environment where healthcare is provided by a qualified healthcare professional. (for adjunctive use only)

The IRIS XP provides for use with both laptop and desktop computer provides the user interface, image storage and display. Use of this device is determined by the healthcare professional and is based upon his or her of the patient's medical condition and requirements. The patient populations include all assessment age groups from adult to pediatric and neonatal. The device is for providing thermal images of the human body. This device is intended for use by qualified healthcare personnel who are trained in its use.

The system is not intended for absolute temperature measurements. The system is not intended to be used as a thermometry device.

IRIS-XP shows an image analysis on the display to measure the amount of infrared rays radiated from the patient. The appropriate color image according to the temperature difference is shown on the screen. The IRIS XP is intended for relative skin temperature measurements (temperature mapping) for adjunctive use only.

The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the IRIS-XP device, which is a thermal based imaging device. It primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device (MEDITHERM MED2000) rather than presenting a detailed study proving the device meets specific acceptance criteria in the format requested.

Therefore, many of the requested categories cannot be directly extracted from the provided document. The document explicitly states: "Clinical testing was not required to demonstrate the substantial equivalence of the IRIS-XP to its predicate device." This means that a clinical study designed to prove the device meets acceptance criteria as typically understood for performance metrics (like sensitivity, specificity, accuracy against a ground truth) was not performed.

Here's a breakdown of what can be inferred and what cannot:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

The document does not present specific acceptance criteria in terms of clinical performance metrics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, or image quality against a predefined benchmark for a diagnostic task). Instead, it relies on demonstrating that its technical characteristics (specifications) are substantially equivalent to a predicate device.

The closest to "acceptance criteria" and "reported performance" are the technical specifications compared in Table 1 (page 6-7). The implicit acceptance criterion for this submission is that its technical specifications and indications for use are similar enough to the predicate device to not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness.

Ask a specific question about this device