Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K121826
    Date Cleared
    2013-02-13

    (237 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3030
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    INTEGRA PROXIMAL HUMERAL PLATE SYSTEM

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Integra Proximal Humeral Fracture Plate System is designed for fractures and fracture dislocations, osteotomies and non-unions of the proximal humerus. Indications include:

    • Dislocated two-, three-, and four-fragment fractures of the proximal humerus, including fractures . involving osteopenic bone
    • Pseudoarthroses in the proximal humerus .
    • Osteotomies in the proximal humerus .
    Device Description

    The Integra Proximal Humeral Fracture Plate System is composed of left and right humeral reconstruction plate implants in two options, GT Plate and LP Plate. The GT plate is designed to cover the greater tuberosity and is available in four-hole , seven-hole, and ten-hole lengths or sizes. The LP plate is designed to sit lower on the greater tuberosity and is available in three-hole, six-hole, and nine-hole lengths or sizes. The system features 3.5mm locking, non-locking and lag screws, in addition to, 2.7mm locking screws. The Integra Proximal Humeral Fracture Plate System is a single component made from stainless steel (SS 316L). The non-locking, locking and lag screws are made from stainless steel (SS 316L).

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device (Integra Proximal Humeral Fracture Plate System), not a study evaluating software or an AI device. Therefore, the requested information (acceptance criteria, study details, human reader performance, ground truth, etc.) is not applicable and cannot be extracted from the provided text.

    The document primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices based on design, materials, and intended use for regulatory approval. It explicitly states, "Clinical performance data were not necessary to support substantial equivalence."

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1